(Oof, I tend to write overly verbose posts...)
Had my first try with demos of the 97D and 97H, along with the Pure Drive Tour (coach suggested some time ago to give something like it a try, to just feel the difference). I played a set with my usual hitting partner, and I changed racquets every changeover. Started with my Prestige MP for the first game to establish a reference point, then... uh, can't remember which order I tried the three demos, but I was losing 1-4 and it wasn't after I won 7-5 and he mentioned that once I had rotated back to my 97HD and PMP I turned things around - made me think to what
@alexsoin mentioned before.
I thought it was more that I was taken aback by how assertively he was hitting (we hadn't played sets in a while) and I assumed I just took a bit of time to adjust my game to it. But I digress.
Prior to and after the set I tried out the three sticks and while I was initially worried I'd like the 97D over my 97HD, that was absolutely not the case. It's kind of like... the 97D is an attractive guy/gal you go out on a date with, but then their sibling (the 97HD) that you meet later is
way hotter. Not a great analogy since the 97HD has been my stick, but in terms of relative draw to the racquets... OK, maybe more like, the 97HD is your dream partner, then you meet their younger sibling and they're like, meh, no inclination to, say set them up with my best friend for a blind date. The 97D did hit similarly to my 97HD, but there wasn't any Wow factor/feeling/impression to it. Whereas when I'd demoed the 97HD earlier this year it wasn't until my third day with it that it clicked for me, so I guess that's something to bear in mind. I want to say the 97D is the easier racquet to hit with, but it just didn't leave much of an impression.
For me personally the 97H was the more standout of the two VCPs. It played like a less maneuverable but far more comfortable RF97. I really enjoyed how it felt, but I found it almost too unwieldy for me. I wasn't hitting late or anything - how I seemed to naturally adjust was to compact my backswing some, allow momentum of the heft do much of the work upon/after impact, and simply guide the followthrough. As much as I enjoyed hitting with it, unfortunately it just seems too much for me.
Serving felt most comfortable (of the demos) with the Pure Drive Tour, and I was pleasantly surprised by how it felt - I was worried because the demo looked to be strung up with Solinco Tour Bite (some of the text rubbed off, but I'm >90% certain based off color and the shape and letters I could make out). I totally understand the appeal to it but why I wouldn't ever choose it is because I noticed I hit really loopy shots instinctively to keep my groundstrokes in. Maybe it's partially the... "anal-retentive" aspect of my personality, but I really disliked feeling the relative lack of control. Or at least the sensation of that. But there's definitely a comfort and satisfaction to hitting with it.
My new stringjob on my 97HD felt pretty good. I want to say it'll take some breaking in before it feels more warm/fuzzy for me again, but I hit decently with it nonetheless.
I'll hit with the demos again tomorrow, will see if anything new clicks for me or the like. Thus far, the 97HD still reigns supreme for me.
Edit: I think I made the 97D sound worse than it is. It's definitely a solid racquet. I can understand someone liking it over the 97HD, especially considering the comparative ease to hitting with it. There are definitely times when I wonder to myself and aloud (re: my 97HD) - why would I choose to make things 'difficult' for myself?