Yonex Vcore Tour 89 and 97 specs

hmmm but they are still two totally different sticks aren't they? if the 95d is just an improved 89t then we would all be using the 95d right? has anyone played with both? which one did you end up liking?

i'm probably thinking too much about this, we all know i'm gonna end up with a spare 89t AND a 95d. :shock:

The 95 is a really good racket, great directional control, uniform flex, feels bulkier to swing because of the extra headsize, which feels like swinging a 100", feel is ok.
89 has flex, weight in the head, better feel, less power obviously but I'm stringing it ten pounds lower, so don't see any difference in the two. Both good serving, I prefer the 89 cos I prefer the way it swings and flex, also I seen to get best results with poly string lowish.
 
LOL a 94t would be awesome wouldn't it. micro-core at 10 and 2, lower static weight than the 89t; perfect for slapping some leather and lead on. positively drool-worthy.

so... am i right to assume, 95d = slightly more power/some control, 89t = feel/ slightly more more control?
fify


When comparing the 89t and 95d head sizes, the difference was really only the length of the head. It's well known now that the 89t has a wide head with shortened length to make it 89sq in.

I did feel that the 95d was slightly more powerful, but nothing jaw dropping. I agree with your assumption.
 
The 95 is more of a money for nothing racquet. 325 sw that hits like 335. I like it off the ground more than the 89, but there is something amazing about serving with the 89...just huge power and spin. The 89 is more old school nuetral off the ground, but if you rely heavily on serve and play short points, its top notch.
 
I was thinking of ordering a 89T with Yonex tour super 850 pro at 57lbs.

Does this seem like a good setup for this racquet?

IMO yes ! And my experience tells me that in this stick it is somehow far less important to string crosses @ 1-3 lbs lower to compensate for better pocketing and more uniform tension across the string bed. It's probably the only mid I haven't (successfully) done this with.
 
Have tinkered with my set up.....weight, sw, balance etc have remained the same. Original mods using the lighter foil tape consisted of four large strips of lead from 10-2 (4g). The new mod which was similar to my volkl dnx mid set up using the dense lead (4g) distributed between and located at 10,12 & 2.
I know this is nothing new and is a subtle change but it has enabled me to keep the sw I want whilst making the racket more manouverable. There is definately something to do with the headshape that makes these sticks swing a little heavier. This set up seems to work much better for those who like to have a little more static/swingweight in their sticks.

Before
2012-07-07083729.jpg


After
2012-07-10133426.jpg


On another note, Black code @50lbs is beautiful in the 89t. Ive just strung my other up with Pros Pro Hexaspin @45lbs, not as crisp as BC, very signum hex like, pleasing elasticity, pop and feel, lots of spin.

I want to make an update,

First of all I added the lead tape like Meaghan in the first pic, lead tape from 10 all the way to 2. And try different strings, Gut /Alu Power, Black Widow/Prince Synthetic, then full Black Widow but I was pleased but not feeling greatness like my PT57A XL.


Then I took Meaghan tips and instead of a full strip it put it the exact same way 4 pieces of lead in each side just like the second picture of his post. But I had 5.2 grams on the top.

But also change the strings to Klip Legend 16 at 50 lbs and crosses Silverstring 1.20 at 48.

WOW , its just Fricking awesome !!!!!

Just like Meaghan told me, just by changing the lead set up the racket became more manouverable, I hit with one hand backhand and now I´m hitting winners with it, its just a complete different racket.

Also the strings feel awesome !!!

For me this is the greatest racket I ever held I´m hitting winners down the line, cross court forehand and backhand and hitting aces, only the part I´m having trouble is on the net, but I need to say I´m so terrible at the net that with any racket I won´t be good.
 
rader, meaghan, filphil & fedK,

thanks for all your comments and advice re the 95d. seems like it'll play pretty similar to the 89t in some ways, but different in others. really really REALLY tempted to go out and get one just to satisfy the curiousity. only point of concern is that the 95d would deprive me of the flex and feel of the 89t which i am really enjoying..
 
I strung up one of my 89t with Solinco Tour Bite 17g. We used the JET method at a reference tension of 43lbs and ended up with a DT of 33. The cross are also 5% lower to accommodate the isometric head shape.

My strokes have a flat trajectory with heavy spin. For the way I hit, the racket is enjoyable and very forgiving at the moment.
 
Last edited:
Alright I need to decide on a racket to settle down with once and for all. After a failed attempt with the 97T 330g, I now have the 89T, 97T 310g, 95d, BLX Blade, and Pure Storm LTD to demo, and they will be compared against my IG Prestige MP. I'm really excited to just be with ONE at the end of all this and focus on my tennis game itself versus my equipment. Wish me luck! I would love to be with Yonex but we'll see how it goes!
 
Alright I need to decide on a racket to settle down with once and for all. After a failed attempt with the 97T 330g, I now have the 89T, 97T 310g, 95d, BLX Blade, and Pure Storm LTD to demo, and they will be compared against my IG Prestige MP. I'm really excited to just be with ONE at the end of all this and focus on my tennis game itself versus my equipment. Wish me luck! I would love to be with Yonex but we'll see how it goes!

Did you get that 310g from outside the US? Would have been awesome if that option was readily available in the states.
 
seen the FS/T forum? i think there's a few for sale there.

and that is an awesome list of sticks to demo PureBabs. you're gonna have a blast trying them all out. do you hit with a 1hbh?
 
seen the FS/T forum? i think there's a few for sale there.

and that is an awesome list of sticks to demo PureBabs. you're gonna have a blast trying them all out. do you hit with a 1hbh?

Oh yeah. I got my 89 tours from the netherlands. I :lol: at the kg tension range when I first saw it.
 
Alright I need to decide on a racket to settle down with once and for all. After a failed attempt with the 97T 330g, I now have the 89T, 97T 310g, 95d, BLX Blade, and Pure Storm LTD to demo, and they will be compared against my IG Prestige MP. I'm really excited to just be with ONE at the end of all this and focus on my tennis game itself versus my equipment. Wish me luck! I would love to be with Yonex but we'll see how it goes!

I think I've mentioned it here before, but I've tried the 95d, 97T 330, and 97T 310, and absolutely loved the 97T 310. Perfect weight, feel, balance, right amount of power for my game. And it replaced the IG Prestige MP that I was using up until that time. Haven't tried the 89T yet, but plan on doing so as it has definitely peaked my interest. But couldn't be happier with the 97 310 so far!
 
Kinda surprised by the lack of comments from RDX 500 Mid users...I think I only saw one post from someone who directly referred to previously using the RDX Mid in all 40 pages.

I've returned to the Mid in the last few months after switching to the Dunlop 300 series for a few years.

Realized I was weighting up the Dunlop to about the same spec as the RDX, and on a whim took out one of my mids one afternoon for a hit and haven't looked back since.

So I'm really interested in the 89...I think it looks great, and felt great (swung one in a local shop but they don't have a demo strung up yet).

Should be able to pick up the demo Friday or Saturday, but wondering if any former RDX Mid users are lurking around who have tried the 89 and how they thought the two racquets compared. I love the plush feeling of my mids...wondering how far off from that the 89s are.
 
Last edited:
Sorry guys.....how would you stack up the Yonex RD Ti 80 vs the Yonex Vcore 89 Tour, besides the larger head size of the RD Ti80....the specs are almost the same?
I am looking to try Yonex frames, my past experience has been the Yonex RX-37 only.Any info/help would be appreciated.

This is my game a high 4.5 to a low 5.0.....my serve is very consistent though not big....I can easily get my flat serves in the range of 80-99MPH with a 75% chance of them being in....my 2nd serve is a kick serve around 70-80MPH but more in the 70's....my forehand is more eastern than western, though it can go to a semi western depending on the ball, I have a eastern single backhand, I normally play from the baseline but am trying to end points at the net, my previous stick is the Asian Wilson K6.1 tour.
 
Update:
Strung 330 97t with full bed Lux M2 Plus at 48Lbs (on a Neos) and hit for 2 hours. Compared to OGSM 17, I got the typical poly benefits - less power, more control and placement, slightly more spin, louder pop sound from the string bed (which I like). I'm able to take bigger swipes at the ball. Volleys still felt great with this poly.

The M2 Plus continued the arm friendly-ness on the 97t.

The next biggest change is that I have gotten used to the stock swing weight and it feels great.

My initial impression of the 97t still stands. Very crisp feeling stick that is also comfortable. It let's me do what I want. The 97t will probably be my main stick for a while.
 
Alright I need to decide on a racket to settle down with once and for all. After a failed attempt with the 97T 330g, I now have the 89T, 97T 310g, 95d, BLX Blade, and Pure Storm LTD to demo, and they will be compared against my IG Prestige MP. I'm really excited to just be with ONE at the end of all this and focus on my tennis game itself versus my equipment. Wish me luck! I would love to be with Yonex but we'll see how it goes!

Hi what did you not like about the 97t?
 
Did you get that 310g from outside the US? Would have been awesome if that option was readily available in the states.

I got it on the FS/FT boards here. I agree with you that I think it should be available here, and I just had to get one to try it or it would have haunted me to not know what it would be like!

that is an awesome list of sticks to demo PureBabs. you're gonna have a blast trying them all out. do you hit with a 1hbh?

Thanks mykoh! I'm very excited to hit with them all. Funny enough, I have demoed them all before (except the 310g 97T) but its been forever since I've hit with the Blade and the Pure Storm LTD. I do hope this time around that one racket just sticks out though, as I am tired of demoing and just want to decide on one. Also, I do not hit with a 1hbh, but I do use the 1hbh slice frequently.

I think I've mentioned it here before, but I've tried the 95d, 97T 330, and 97T 310, and absolutely loved the 97T 310. Perfect weight, feel, balance, right amount of power for my game. And it replaced the IG Prestige MP that I was using up until that time. Haven't tried the 89T yet, but plan on doing so as it has definitely peaked my interest. But couldn't be happier with the 97 310 so far!

This gets me pretty excited for my 310g to get here! Especially since you switched from the IG Prestige MP.

Hi what did you not like about the 97t?

I loved the demo experience with the 330g 97T. Unfortunately it's a tough racket to manuever because of its weight, swingweight, headsize, etc. Something about it just makes it too much to handle (for me). I could see how it would be a great racket for some, and actually it reminded me of the playability of the Head Youtek Radical Pro (old version). Tons of plow through and pop but tough to maneuver. Since my game is based around groundstrokes, I need something a little bit faster through the air or I'll be late at contact and mishit a ton.
 
Finally got to play with my new 97t (330)... I think I still prefer the 95d but will continue to experiment.
 
Just got done with a hour or so hitting session with the 89T. WOW! I cannot believe the headsize is really 89. If you have a one handed back hand and can wield a 12oz racket this might be your racket. This thing just cuts through the air. Forehands were pin point for me. Easy spin, great control, and power is there when you want it to be. I demoed the 97 as well but the 89 was so good I probably did not really give the 97 a fair chance. I normally play with a PB10 mid and the 89 seems to be a lot easier to hit with even though the head size is smaller. It is more noticable on the backhand side for me. Going to get some sets in with the fellas on Sunday for a more complete review. Initial thoughts after an hour of hitting groundies is "I think I found my new weapon". I have demoed about 10 rackets so far this year. This is by far the most impressive, initially.
 
Just got done with a hour or so hitting session with the 89T. WOW! I cannot believe the headsize is really 89. If you have a one handed back hand and can wield a 12oz racket this might be your racket. This thing just cuts through the air. Forehands were pin point for me. Easy spin, great control, and power is there when you want it to be. I demoed the 97 as well but the 89 was so good I probably did not really give the 97 a fair chance. I normally play with a PB10 mid and the 89 seems to be a lot easier to hit with even though the head size is smaller. It is more noticable on the backhand side for me. Going to get some sets in with the fellas on Sunday for a more complete review. Initial thoughts after an hour of hitting groundies is "I think I found my new weapon". I have demoed about 10 rackets so far this year. This is by far the most impressive, initially.

I think I posted this on tw somewhere. I have the same sentiments as you do. On the forehand, the 97t and 89t felt equally impressive. It was my sw/extreme eastern backhand where I felt the 89t began to shine. It felt fantastic.
 
I have a 2hbh when not tested and a 1hbh when on the run and I will be using this racquet as my go to when I get it friday. Granted it doesn't generate as much power and my LM instinct tour xl, or my radical tour xl, or even the juice pro I demo'd alongside this, but I can stick a ball anywhere on the court with the 2hbh.
 
purebabs, i think you're gonna love the 310 97t. i am seriously considering getting one for myself too. :D

anyone feel yonex made a huge improvement from the vcore line to the vcore-tour line?
 
purebabs, i think you're gonna love the 310 97t. i am seriously considering getting one for myself too. :D

anyone feel yonex made a huge improvement from the vcore line to the vcore-tour line?

I can't wait to hit with it. I love the feel of the tours as well, and unfortunately the 95d just doesn't have the same solid feel. Although it does have good power and spin! Really hoping the 310g 97T is the one.
 
^ my experience is that the the 310g just lacks the mass that makes the 330g feel so solid. i found it really under-powered. considering it has a lower sw and is more flexible than the 95d, i'm thinking you'll find the 310g anemic. that said there is a lot of room to customize and play around with the weight, balance, and sw.
 
Got the 89T demo today...hit for an hour or so w/our pro (wife couldn't take her lesson so I filled in).

Very nice, but ultimately I'm not so sure it will be for me. Coming from the my old trusty RDX Mids, and was hoping it would be closer to that racquet in feel than it is.

As others have noticed, sweet spot is very generous, doesn't feel like a 89 from that perspective. Head shape is a little odd (and I go back the Yonex R7, so I'm used to odd Yonex shapes). :)

The racquet provides a very interesting, to me almost unique combination of a very stiff feel combined with a high level of comfort. It was strung at 60, I string at 55, and didn't feel the additional tension caused any issues.

Hit serves for a bit before the lesson...definitely easier to acces pop w/the 89T than the RDX Mid, spin seemed similar on serves. Probably appreciated the racquet's stiffness most with serving.

Hit hard for an hour (our pro likes to keep things moving) and had zero comfort issues. In spite of how stiff the racquet feels, it actually really comfortable and smooth, not jarring. Dampened w/out killing touch, really well done.

I'm a relatively flat hitter, and what spin I wanted/needed was very easy to get, and if you relax and let the racquet do the work you can hit through the court with ease. Less work w/the 89T than the RDX to generate power on the ground.

Volleys were excellent, easy to punch or hit with touch, racquet felt very maneuverable.

Ultimately, the reason I'm likely to keep using my RDX Mids is that I just find it very hard to give up the wet noodles feel that they are famous for. :) I love the flex and give of the RDX, and the 89T just isn't trying to live in that space.

Caveat is that I only had an hour with 89T, and I'm going to hit with it a few more times over the next few days to see if I change my tune. Not ruling out being won over...serves were definitely excellent, ground strokes and volleys worked pretty much from the first few hits, it's just the overall stiff feel of the racquet that is initially not to my taste.

But like others, I can see a lot of folks being really happy w/this racquet. If only they offered a ED version. ;-)
 
^ my experience is that the the 310g just lacks the mass that makes the 330g feel so solid. i found it really under-powered. considering it has a lower sw and is more flexible than the 95d, i'm thinking you'll find the 310g anemic. that said there is a lot of room to customize and play around with the weight, balance, and sw.

Put a couple of grams at 12 and it will come to life.
 
Got the 89T demo today...hit for an hour or so w/our pro (wife couldn't take her lesson so I filled in).

Very nice, but ultimately I'm not so sure it will be for me. Coming from the my old trusty RDX Mids, and was hoping it would be closer to that racquet in feel than it is.

As others have noticed, sweet spot is very generous, doesn't feel like a 89 from that perspective. Head shape is a little odd (and I go back the Yonex R7, so I'm used to odd Yonex shapes). :)

The racquet provides a very interesting, to me almost unique combination of a very stiff feel combined with a high level of comfort. It was strung at 60, I string at 55, and didn't feel the additional tension caused any issues.

Hit serves for a bit before the lesson...definitely easier to acces pop w/the 89T than the RDX Mid, spin seemed similar on serves. Probably appreciated the racquet's stiffness most with serving.

Hit hard for an hour (our pro likes to keep things moving) and had zero comfort issues. In spite of how stiff the racquet feels, it actually really comfortable and smooth, not jarring. Dampened w/out killing touch, really well done.

I'm a relatively flat hitter, and what spin I wanted/needed was very easy to get, and if you relax and let the racquet do the work you can hit through the court with ease. Less work w/the 89T than the RDX to generate power on the ground.

Volleys were excellent, easy to punch or hit with touch, racquet felt very maneuverable.

Ultimately, the reason I'm likely to keep using my RDX Mids is that I just find it very hard to give up the wet noodles feel that they are famous for. :) I love the flex and give of the RDX, and the 89T just isn't trying to live in that space.

Caveat is that I only had an hour with 89T, and I'm going to hit with it a few more times over the next few days to see if I change my tune. Not ruling out being won over...serves were definitely excellent, ground strokes and volleys worked pretty much from the first few hits, it's just the overall stiff feel of the racquet that is initially not to my taste.

But like others, I can see a lot of folks being really happy w/this racquet. If only they offered a ED version. ;-)

Have you ever played with a Volkl pb10? It sounds like that would fit right in your wheel house. It's less forgiving than a yonex equivalent but still a capable racket.
 
Have you ever played with a Volkl pb10? It sounds like that would fit right in your wheel house. It's less forgiving than a yonex equivalent but still a capable racket.

I've hit with and almost purchased several Volkl racquets in the past, but haven't tried the PB10...just read up on it. I'll have to give it a try, sounds very interesting, especially the flex. :)

Thanks.
 
I've hit with and almost purchased several Volkl racquets in the past, but haven't tried the PB10...just read up on it. I'll have to give it a try, sounds very interesting, especially the flex. :)

Thanks.

Think of it this way - Out of all the pb rackets sold on tennis warehouse, that damned racket is STILL over $175. They won't let those rackets go easy.
 
Got the 89T demo today...hit for an hour or so w/our pro (wife couldn't take her lesson so I filled in).

Very nice, but ultimately I'm not so sure it will be for me. Coming from the my old trusty RDX Mids, and was hoping it would be closer to that racquet in feel than it is.

As others have noticed, sweet spot is very generous, doesn't feel like a 89 from that perspective. Head shape is a little odd (and I go back the Yonex R7, so I'm used to odd Yonex shapes).

The racquet provides a very interesting, to me almost unique combination of a very stiff feel combined with a high level of comfort. It was strung at 60, I string at 55, and didn't feel the additional tension caused any issues.

Hit serves for a bit before the lesson...definitely easier to acces pop w/the 89T than the RDX Mid, spin seemed similar on serves. Probably appreciated the racquet's stiffness most with serving.

Hit hard for an hour (our pro likes to keep things moving) and had zero comfort issues. In spite of how stiff the racquet feels, it actually really comfortable and smooth, not jarring. Dampened w/out killing touch, really well done.

I'm a relatively flat hitter, and what spin I wanted/needed was very easy to get, and if you relax and let the racquet do the work you can hit through the court with ease. Less work w/the 89T than the RDX to generate power on the ground.

Volleys were excellent, easy to punch or hit with touch, racquet felt very maneuverable.

Ultimately, the reason I'm likely to keep using my RDX Mids is that I just find it very hard to give up the wet noodles feel that they are famous for. :) I love the flex and give of the RDX, and the 89T just isn't trying to live in that space.

Caveat is that I only had an hour with 89T, and I'm going to hit with it a few more times over the next few days to see if I change my tune. Not ruling out being won over...serves were definitely excellent, ground strokes and volleys worked pretty much from the first few hits, it's just the overall stiff feel of the racquet that is initially not to my taste.

But like others, I can see a lot of folks being really happy w/this racquet. If only they offered a ED version. ;-)


I too have been trying to find a replacement for my RDX500 mids and I have tried a lot and nothing seems to come close. Read up on some people saying the vcore89 is similar or is a good replacement. I disagree, they hit different. Not saying that the 89 is a bad racket, it's an awesome racket.

My fh ( I hit flat)was the thing that shined most(rest of my strokes are crap anyways:) ) with the RDX. I felt a bit more spin on the 89. I agree with most of your assessments. Kick serve seems easier to access with the 89. Backhands were sooo much better with the 89 as well. Volleys? I was punching everything. The weight is noticeable with the 89 but I felt so good with it I was brave going into the net way more because I felt like what ever came my way I could deal with it. And those hafl volley blocks on the baseline? Pfff I felt natural hehe, dropshotsand touch shots? very accessible. I am putting my RDX aside for now, they are old anyways, I might dig them up again sometime. The vcore 89 is such a revelation. I am yet to use it against big servers and see how they are. But even block shots are better. And oh, slice backhands are better too. I hope I keep loving it and I can put the RDXs to rest. We will see but for now, this is one hell of a stick. Took me awhile to really appreciate it and I hope you give it more time too.
 
Got the 89T demo today... The racquet provides a very interesting, to me almost unique combination of a very stiff feel combined with a high level of comfort. It was strung at 60, I string at 55, and didn't feel the additional tension caused any issues.

Seems like this was strung wayyyy too tight!
 
After my second day of demoing I can rule out the Wilson BLX Blade, the Babolat PS LTD, and even the Yonex 89T. I flat out just couldn't connect with the Babolat, and the Blade was too way too stiff. Still love the 89T though... it'd be a fun stick to keep in the bag but not one to play competitive matches with for me.

Now for the tough stuff... I'm really enjoying the 97T 310. It does pretty much everything the 330 does except with more managable weight and heft. I do see where people complain it's underpowered though, and I'm still trying to dial in my serve. It also does feel stiffer than the 330 but I think that is because its strung with full Tour Bite, and I almost never string full-out poly. The 95d on the other hand, I serve great with, and it has great access to power and spin. But of course I broke a string today and so I cant say much in comparison to the others quite yet.

Basically, it's the 95d versus the 97T 310g versus the Prestige IG MP. I'm hoping in the coming days of playing with these, one will really stick out and I will be content! Anyone care to take a guess as to which one I'll end up with?
 
I'll take a whack at it. I think you'll pull the trigger for the 95d. You didn't mention that the 95d felt underpowered and I don't think you can pass that up. Strung weights will be similar when comparing the 95d and the 310 97t. It also seems like the 95d is the racket you picked up and could swing away with no problems.
 
Hi Everyone,

I am new in the forum and I need opinion with the 89T, I read many of your comments and it seems to be a very interesting racquet. Unfortunately in my country I cannot do demo and Yonex also not popular as tennis racquet, so it is unlikely that I can get 89T.
I will be going to Singapore on Monday and maybe I can get 89T over there, so I definitely need quick answer :)

I am using 95D at the moment and loving it. I love the power, I can generate good power, control, serving, volley, and backcourt is no problem.
But, eventhough I can find control, I still want even more control and against heavy hitter there is a possibility to get pushed behind.

On the other side, I am afraid to get 89T primarily because it is below 90" and with my age (I am 34) I do not know how long I can maintain my skills and how well I can hit with 89T after playing for 2 hours is also unknown. I certainly dont have any problem playing with 95D for 2 hours or more.
I am also afraid that using 89T will cause me to lose power.

To sum it up, all I want is to get the same feeling and power of 95D but more control.

Given your experience with 89T, especially for people that try 95D before, do you guys think this is the racquet that I am looking for?
 
I use the RQis Tour 1 LIGHT and over the past year or so I've added some weight to get the frame to 11.8oz + 7.8 points HL. Per TW University tools, the SW went up to 325... so it's pretty close to the regular specs.

What I like about the frame is the racquet head speed on serves esp. spin serves. I like the soft/flexible feel. I have a 1h-BH and mainly hit slice BHs. Although this frame is said to be "under powered" I feel I generated plenty of power esp. on serve.

So what's the better upgrade: 95d or 89? Which frame is better suited for serving esp. spin serves (I rarely hit flat serves)?

Other racquets-- I have used an RDX500 in the past but didn't like it for serving. I did use an RDS002 tour prior to the RQis; I felt I hit the BH better w/ the RQIS and made the switch.
 
I have no real experience with any Yonex racket other than the 89T but I can tell you that producing spin on serves was no problem. Kickers, slices, and top spin was easy to achieve. Power is there when needed like most player spec frames. This is a great racket for a one handed backhand. Give it a demo if you can. I am making a switch to this racket from the PB10 mid. I am playing at a 4.5 level these days.
 
For those considering switching from a 95d to an 89t. I highly recommend that you do not have to make that switch. The 89t is a fantastic playing racket, no doubt. I cannot say, however, that the difference is enough to spend money on a new racket where most of the complaints of the current 95d can be remedied with lead tape and string tension adjustment.

When I hit both I really liked the 95d. I did not have either, though, so I ended up purchasing the 89t. I have made the comment that if there was a 94t, I may have ended up taking that stick instead.
 
I too have been trying to find a replacement for my RDX500 mids and I have tried a lot and nothing seems to come close. Read up on some people saying the vcore89 is similar or is a good replacement. I disagree, they hit different. Not saying that the 89 is a bad racket, it's an awesome racket.

My fh ( I hit flat)was the thing that shined most(rest of my strokes are crap anyways:) ) with the RDX. I felt a bit more spin on the 89. I agree with most of your assessments. Kick serve seems easier to access with the 89. Backhands were sooo much better with the 89 as well. Volleys? I was punching everything. The weight is noticeable with the 89 but I felt so good with it I was brave going into the net way more because I felt like what ever came my way I could deal with it. And those hafl volley blocks on the baseline? Pfff I felt natural hehe, dropshotsand touch shots? very accessible. I am putting my RDX aside for now, they are old anyways, I might dig them up again sometime. The vcore 89 is such a revelation. I am yet to use it against big servers and see how they are. But even block shots are better. And oh, slice backhands are better too. I hope I keep loving it and I can put the RDXs to rest. We will see but for now, this is one hell of a stick. Took me awhile to really appreciate it and I hope you give it more time too.

Nice feedback,,,,I have couple rdx 500 mid, but this 89 isn´t in my country yet...
 
Nice feedback,,,,I have couple rdx 500 mid, but this 89 isn´t in my country yet...

Give it a try and give it time, the 89 has a much heavier feel and has more touch. I like the sound of the ball when I hit it too :). Where do you live? You still can find the RDX mids where you are? I really love them and had a hard time parting with them, I only have two and it's really getting scraped and old and couldn't find replacements.
 
For those considering switching from a 95d to an 89t. I highly recommend that you do not have to make that switch. The 89t is a fantastic playing racket, no doubt. I cannot say, however, that the difference is enough to spend money on a new racket where most of the complaints of the current 95d can be remedied with lead tape and string tension adjustment.

When I hit both I really liked the 95d. I did not have either, though, so I ended up purchasing the 89t. I have made the comment that if there was a 94t, I may have ended up taking that stick instead.

Thanks filphil, I think that your answer is pretty much to sum it up what I want to know.
But I am curious, since you are hitting 95D as well, is 89T has the same power as 95D (stock form)?
 
Thanks filphil, I think that your answer is pretty much to sum it up what I want to know.
But I am curious, since you are hitting 95D as well, is 89T has the same power as 95D (stock form)?

When I had the 95d and 89t, they were both demo sticks from TW with the same multifilament string. I don't remember one being more powerful than the other. I can say, however, that neither lacked in the power department.
 
Got sick of waiting forever for reviews on comparing between Qtour and 89t, I decided to purchase one myself yesterday to see what this 89t hype was all about. Strung with the same string set-up as my Qtour, but 6 pounds lower at 48lbs, I shall experience myself later at my hitting session to see if 89t has what it takes to dethrone the Qtour!
 
I too have been trying to find a replacement for my RDX500 mids and I have tried a lot and nothing seems to come close. Read up on some people saying the vcore89 is similar or is a good replacement. I disagree, they hit different. Not saying that the 89 is a bad racket, it's an awesome racket.

My fh ( I hit flat)was the thing that shined most(rest of my strokes are crap anyways:) ) with the RDX. I felt a bit more spin on the 89. I agree with most of your assessments. Kick serve seems easier to access with the 89. Backhands were sooo much better with the 89 as well. Volleys? I was punching everything. The weight is noticeable with the 89 but I felt so good with it I was brave going into the net way more because I felt like what ever came my way I could deal with it. And those hafl volley blocks on the baseline? Pfff I felt natural hehe, dropshotsand touch shots? very accessible. I am putting my RDX aside for now, they are old anyways, I might dig them up again sometime. The vcore 89 is such a revelation. I am yet to use it against big servers and see how they are. But even block shots are better. And oh, slice backhands are better too. I hope I keep loving it and I can put the RDXs to rest. We will see but for now, this is one hell of a stick. Took me awhile to really appreciate it and I hope you give it more time too.

Great to hear from another RDX Mid holdover. :)

I had another hit w/it today, but it was just a social mixed doubles so didn't get to really hit, if you know what I mean.

I did end the session feeling better about the 89T.

Then hit w/my son tonight for a bit...he's able to really push me so it was a fun and useful session. My impressions of how the 89T fits my game continued to improve overall, and I'm getting more used to the additional stiffness. One problem I'm having is managing the additional power...hitting more shots just a little too long, have to adjust to that. One thing I like very much is how solid it feels on volleys and its ability to punch the ball, while maintaining enough touch for soft shots as well.

I hope to pick up a Volkl PB 10 mid on Monday to use in my regular doubles match mid-week, so I'll be able to compare those two side-by-side.

I wish I could cut out the strings and try some other setups. In the end if I like this better than others, including the PB10 Mid, I might just have to buy an 89T and experiment a bit and sell it if it doesn't work out.
 
Give it a try and give it time, the 89 has a much heavier feel and has more touch. I like the sound of the ball when I hit it too :). Where do you live? You still can find the RDX mids where you are? I really love them and had a hard time parting with them, I only have two and it's really getting scraped and old and couldn't find replacements.

That's funny - I have noticed and agree as well, the sound of hitting the ball w/the 89T is really nice.
 
Back
Top