The Blond Blur
G.O.A.T.
Eh this happened like 2 games in. Shapo was just returning like trash and took it out on the umpire. At least he didn’t hit this one 

This guy´s OCD is off the charts
Ahhhhh if not for shot clock the 2006 French Open would still be going onthe shot clock is stupid
The ones who move the most tickets and draw the biggest ratings are the establishment darlings. You're going to tell me that isn't Federer?Because contrary to popular belief Fed's not the establishment darling, one guess who very much is though.
Carlos Bernardes is an amazing proof of how the bullying tactic will always derive the best results and the most wished outcomes.![]()
I totally respect individual routines. But not if it disrupts the opponent. When a server bounces the ball 4-5 times on some points and then on important points bounces it 10-15 times (Djokovic) it can be quite disruptive bc the returner usually crouches down into a ready position once the server starts bouncing the ball. This can be mentally annoying AND physically tiring for the opponent to have to wait like that. There should be a rule that a server can wait as long as he wants within the limits of the serve clock to come to the line (so he gather his concentration) but once he’s there he should follow a similar routine. Back in the days of the epic Fed vs Nadal and Djokovic matchups even as a TV spectator, I couldn’t stand those long waits that Nadal and Djokovic put Fed through when they were serving.I don't think it's a game. It's just their routine and tennis is an individual sport. Not everyone can just throw the ball up and strike aces like Isner.
Saying Nadal and Federer cheat and/or gamesmanship is like saying Djokovic and Federer smash racket.Just cause you don't see it does not mean it doesn't happen, fed has cheated quite alot but I don't expect a supporter to be honest about that.
Federer is a much better racquet smasher than Novak when operating at peak rage and efficiencySaying Nadal and Federer cheat and/or gamesmanship is like saying Djokovic and Federer smash racket.
The difference is night and day
But 1000 >>>>>>> 1Federer is a much better racquet smasher than Novak when operating at peak rage and efficiency
I’ve never seen Novak destroy a racquet like that with just one mere hit.
The issue with rules is that they apply to the entire sport. So what do you do at tournaments where the players have to go pick up their own balls? There are a lot of tournaments outside of the TV world.I think the time should be shortened to 10 seconds or less, no towelling and no bouncing.
If they ignore enforcing objective black/white rules, which the fans can all see they are ignoring, just imagine what other, more private, "tests" they ignore?
Federer very much is the Establishment. They even changed the surface here to try and help him win.
That's probably bc Djokovic plays the same timing game.
Do these tournaments use Hawkeye?The issue with rules is that they apply to the entire sport. So what do you do at tournaments where the players have to go pick up their own balls? There are a lot of tournaments outside of the TV world.
He needs to learn how to ask nicely.He wasn't wrong about the code violation.
Federer very much is the Establishment. They even changed the surface here to try and help him win.
Very interesting viewpoint!I used to get irritated every time McEnroe would to go into one of his rants with the umps. Then I realized that pro tennis is akin to pro 'wrasslin.' Everyone gets paid by the same overarching entities including the umpires. Pro tennis is simply a parochial ad lib form of entertainment like stand up comedy. Now I look at MTOs, racquet smashing, umpire arguments, pickin the a../nose/ears, 20 some ball bounces pre serve, waving off the servers serve to allow receiver to dictate server pace, etc., as the peculiarities of what is allowed within pro tennis' narrow entertainment confines.
A fan gets to guess or even loosely place a bet trying to figure when one of the other players cracks not just under tennis pressure, but the allowed ad lib/planned secondary buffoonery. I would suggest that all pro tennis players develop a series of gamesmanship gambits that are employed just as is the drop shot or out wide kick serve. Its just entertainment after all. Let the naive amateur weekender tennis players worry about fairness, honesty, etc. Really, who wants to watch Borg like tennis when can see Kyrgios tennis?
He needs to learn how to ask nicely.
A fan gets to guess or even loosely place a bet trying to figure when one of the other players cracks not just under tennis pressure, but the allowed ad lib/planned secondary buffoonery. I would suggest that all pro tennis players develop a series of gamesmanship gambits that are employed just as is the drop shot or out wide kick serve. Its just entertainment after all. Let the naive amateur weekender tennis players worry about fairness, honesty, etc. Really, who wants to watch Borg like tennis when can see Kyrgios tennis?
Let's suppose he cannot play without it. If so, he will refuse to address it. If he does not address it - it can only go worse because our mind goes autopilot whenever it can - repeating whatever it knows to do. It is a very simple causation chain. It is exactly the only way it can be.Nadal OCD getting worse
Time violations should be called electronically.
I think Shapovalov is spot on - as long as the shot clock is there, it should dictate.
And, seriously, Bernardes is like a clown when he says "you're not ready, you come to talk to me". That's acting moronic, and close to deliberate sabotage as I see it. If it was humour, I think it's misplaced. Players want to focus on the job, not dealing with stupidities from umpires.
How were players not being treated equally?Totally agree with Shapo here. All players on court should be treated equally. To hell with people that have been brainwashed to the extent that they believe that someone can play under more lenient rules just because they’ve won more grand slams
Because contrary to popular belief Fed's not the establishment darling
The shot clock showed there were 8 seconds left. Should it dictate? Why was Shapo complaining then?
Well said, Denis.'You guys are all corrupt!' - Denis Shapovalov in furious rant at Rafael Nadal and umpire at Australian Open
"You started the clock like 45 seconds ago and he is not ready to play," Denis Shapovalov began in his angry rant at the umpire over Rafael Nadal's apparent time-wasting. "You started the clock like so long ago and he is still not ready to play. You've gotta code him. Code him! He's not ready to play! Are you kidding me? You guys are all corrupt! You guys are all corrupt!"
Denis Shapovalov let rip with a furious rant at both Rafael Nadal and the umpire Carlos Bernardes during their fiery quarter-final at the Australian Open.
Absolutely livid at what he felt was the 2009 champion at Melbourne Park's constant time-wasting, the Canadian flew into an angry exchange with the umpire where he accused the official of being "corrupt".
With a 1-0 lead in the second set, having lost the opener 6-3, Shapovalov yelled at the umpire for not handing Nadal a code violation for taking too much time between points.
The exchange with the No. 14 seed and the umpire, as Nadal watched on from the other side of the court having not been ready to begin the game, unravelled as follows:
Shapovalov: "You started the clock like 45 seconds ago and he is not ready to play. You started the clock like so long ago and he is still not ready to play. You've gotta code him."
Umpire: "Yeah. I code him now, now you are not ready to play?"
Shapovalov: "Code him!"
Umpire: "For what?"
Shapovalov: "He's not ready to play!"
Umpire: "Yeah but you are not ready to play, because you came to talk to me."
Shapovalov: "Are you kidding me?"
Umpire: "I'm not kidding you."
Shapovalov: "You guys are all corrupt! You guys are all corrupt!"
![]()
'You guys are all corrupt!' - Shapovalov in furious rant at Nadal and umpire
Denis Shapovalov let rip with a furious rant at both Rafael Nadal and the umpire during their fiery quarter-final at the Australian Open.www.eurosport.co.uk
Yet its obvious to even the kindest of Rafa fans that Bernardes is too soft still..Its funny Denis targeted the one umpire who Nadal didn't want to umpire any of his matches a couple of years ago
Nobody has been harder on Nadal than Carlos Bernardes.
I totally agree. He has a lot to learn. However, I think he was just telling the truth. Bernardes is corrupt, no doubt about it. There was a time when Bernardes was young inexperienced and idealistic too. But he got hit so bad that he learned his lessons and became wiser.
Watching one guy pick his butt for 40 seconds isn’t my idea of good sports entertainment.
Wonder what Rafa said to Dennis at the net?
"You do not like to play The Corrupt Tennis?"