JonnyMac
Hall of Fame
Help me, brothers
Yep, you need help ...First step to recovery - admission of the fact that you have a problem.
I'm proud of you SpaceCadet !
Help me, brothers
Never betting on Dimi again...the guy has no bottle when it counts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fa7FtA3bnFM
That he sees nothing wrong with his game at the moment is worrisome.
I'm beginning to think that he should follow Stan's example and take a break from his personal relationship in order to focus on his tennis. Whether you agree with that or not, it seemed to work wonders for Stan. Maybe it could do the same for Grigor? But I think he needs a change of coach first.
Every generation has competition, tbf - I believe he has the tools to deliver, hopefully with the arrival of a good coach and some mental strengthening
What a dumb suggestion. Does Maria have to take a break from Grigor for HER to do better?
Why can she continue to go deep in tournaments and win titles but Grigor can't?
No excuses. Grigor is very good but he has no great weapons. He is a top 10-20 player. Nothing to do with coaches/personal relationships, etc.
No, because her career is not suffering. She has been and continues to be near the top of her trade. She continues to put herself in a position to win Slams. Grigor is not currently doing this.
I don't know. Maybe because she is more disciplined and focussed than he is?
Of course you may well be right. But I do think a new coach may revive his career just as it did for Wawrinka's. It's always worth a try.
But suggesting he alter his personal relationship where he may be very happy is daft IMO. Maybe he should try another coach, that is a more reasonable suggestion than uprooting a personal relationship which may work for him.
IMO, all I see are a bunch of silly excuses from fans regarding Dimitrov. He does not have the tools to be a consistent top five player. I can't see it for the life of me. What has he won? He is 24. Yes, guys like Wawrinka and Cilic never won much and then won slams post age 25 but they both have big weapons in their game.
It is a joke to suggest Grigor doesn't have big weapons in his game. One wonders if those uttering such stuff really watch him play much at all. He has a huge serve that is lethal when on, he is great at the 1-2 punch, his forehand is also one of the most dangerous in the game, and, to top it off, he has one of the best talents for net-play and volleys on tour.
His problem is not his strengths, but his weaknesses, gameplan and consistency.
I won't engage some of the other weird proclamations you have made here, but I'll note that the cocksureness you lay forth these opinions with seems a bit out of place. Did you not learn from your comments about Wawrinka pre Roland Garros?
I have watched Grigor play plenty and IMO he has nothing which separates him from about 100 other players. Yes, his serve is good and he can show some variety but it is not enough for me to see how he can win a slam or be a consistent top five player. In addition, as you suggested his tennis IQ/shot selection is horrible.
Re my prediction about Wawrinka not beating Djokovic in the RG final, I think that the majority probably felt that way but I sure am glad I was wrong about that one. It isn't that I thought Wawrinka did not have the weapons to beat Djokovic, it is that I thought Djokovic with his consistency would outlast Wawrinka physically and mentally.
No, no, no. Prior to the RG you said something to the effect of "Wawrinka has no chance of winning RG anyways, no matter if he plays warm-ups or not" and that it's a miracle he even one one slam (well, now he sits with two). I'm pretty sure you repeated this mantra pretty starkly several times.
Regarding the claim that Dimitrov has nothing that separates him from a hundred others, I think perhaps you need to look harder. I mean, you cannot even conceivably see how he could win a slam? It's very possible that he won't, I don't find it at all that hard to conceive.
He has stop rising....now he is stagnating and slowly going towards decay.
I have watched Grigor play plenty and IMO he has nothing which separates him from about 100 other players. Yes, his serve is good and he can show some variety but it is not enough for me to see how he can win a slam or be a consistent top five player. In addition, as you suggested his tennis IQ/shot selection is horrible.
Re my prediction about Wawrinka not beating Djokovic in the RG final, I think that the majority probably felt that way but I sure am glad I was wrong about that one. It isn't that I thought Wawrinka did not have the weapons to beat Djokovic, it is that I thought Djokovic with his consistency would outlast Wawrinka physically and mentally.
I am sticking to my Dimitrov prediction: He won't win a slam and he is a top 10-20 player.
He did serve really well but I felt Grigor's return game was very poor - he tried to drive everything back at Muller instead of slicing or blocking a few and trying to make the points longer. Gilles is hardly the best mover and he didn't make him run at all - quite the contrary in fact.Did Muller serve like Pete yesterday? How did Grigor lose?
We need a dedicated thread for (Bouchard's) future No #1
With the grass season upon us, let's hope he can recover some form in what has been a largerly indifferent season so far
Predictions over the next few weeks?
I'd go with a Queens final and a Wimbly QF/semi
Vamos!
Break from what - he's won 3 games in the the last month?Quite the opposite, he needs a break.
I have to say, I think this photo is probably more fitting now than OP intended, and there's no small irony in who is jumping with him either...
Does anyone think he should enter one of the upcoming tournaments before Washington?
That's an awfully wrong break for someone struggling for form. Perhaps get a chance to hit a few extra balls?
I have to say, I think this photo is probably more fitting now than OP intended, and there's no small irony in who is jumping with him either...
Link?so thats it, finally fired Rasheed
Dimitrov's twitter. How are you not all over this? I was expecting running commentary!Link?
I'm not on TwitterDimitrov's twitter. How are you not all over this? I was expecting running commentary!
I'm not on Twitter
This is somewhat mixed news for me - I would have kept Rasheed as fitness coach and simply added another 'tactician'. Perhaps Rasheed wasn't prepared to take a pay-cut (don't blame him - to date he remain part of Dimitrov's most successful mini era)
Now Team 8 can really find a top name for him - Agassi or Sampras.
I think he has plateaued from what Rasheed has to offer. He needs a new coach to turn his game around, incorporate all that athleticism gained from being coached by Rasheed into his game to take it to the next level.Your post makes no sense - Rasheed helped him to 4 titles and a #8 in the world
I agree with all of that - but his post implied Rasheed was a disaster. Perhaps I simply interpreted it differently.I think he has plateaued from what Rasheed has to offer. He needs a new coach to turn his game around, incorporate all that athleticism gained from being coached by Rasheed into his game to take it to the next level.
Your post makes no sense - Rasheed helped him to 4 titles and a #8 in the world
This is true.
But sometimes thinks come to an end, and this was a good choice from Dimitrov. Everything has stagnated and he needs a new voice and something new to his game.
Is the adventure over? Did it even begin?