Young upset with PMac

sureshs

Bionic Poster
Young still restless about McEnroe's commentary

Leighton Ginn
The Desert Sun
April 13, 2006

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PALM SPRINGS - When Donald Young was watching the replay of Davis Cup matches on The Tennis Channel, he was having a good time until he heard Patrick McEnroe talking about him.
McEnroe, the captain of the U.S. Davis Cup team and commentator for ESPN, was critical of the 16-year-old Young, who has been getting wildcards into the main events of top-level ATP Tour events despite not winning a set, let alone a match.

"He said, 'This is terrible, why is he even in the tournament. I don't know why he's out here. He can't play out here. He can't do anything. I don't understand it. Whoever is managing him should be fired. ... He should only play juniors,'" said Young after he won his second-round match 6-3, 6-0 over Bozhidar Katsarov in the Easter Bowl on Wednesday at the Riviera Resort in Palm Springs.

Young, the 2004 champion, moves into the third round with a 1 p.m. match today against Jason McNaughton.

Young was the year-end No. 1 in the world and he achieved that status as a 16-year-old.

"It shocked me. I saw the pain in Donald's face," Young's mother and coach Illona said. "Here you are looking for future American talent and you're bashing the highest-ranked junior there is. I don't get it. It just didn't make sense.

"It took me so long to get him back to where he felt he was deserving enough so he would get back out there."

The Youngs also tried to get a hold of McEnroe to express their displeasure over his comments. Their communications have been second hand.

"(McEnroe) had said when he came up he got opportunities because of (his brother) John, but Don's not getting opportunities because of John," Illona Young said. "He's getting opportunities because of what he's done. He's won everything. What's left? Keep treading water and staying in the same place?"


The dilemma is, Young is dominating the juniors, but he's not strong enough yet to compete on the highest level of the professional tour. Yet Young is marketable as a teenage phenomenon who was able to win top-level junior events as a 14-year-old.
And being an African-American in a sport that is perceived to lack diversity, Young is looked on as the great American hope.

Young certainly has gained a lot of attention, beginning when he turned professional at 14, which is unusually young for boys.

Young is an obvious choice for many tournament directors to give a wild card into their tournament, even if he's not ready to compete at that level.

And Young sees nothing wrong with accepting the offers.

"I don't know any other junior who's No. 1 and would not accept a wild card if it was offered to him," Young said. "My dad would accept it. I know anyone would. I know any other junior would accept it if it was offered."

Young is not blind to the fact he's not ready to win at the top level yet. Young accepts the wild cards so he can learn what it's like to be a professional to prepare himself for when he is ready.

"I'm not going to go there and beat (world No. 1 Roger) Federer," Young said. "I'm not thinking that at all. I just wanted to try it out and see how it would be when I'm out of juniors, when I'm 19. I want to know the tournament, the places, the players, the atmosphere and get use to it."

One of McEnroe's criticisms is that Young continually getting beat would hurt his confidence.

On Wednesday, Young was easy to laugh at his career and he has kept his head on straight. Young is taking the whole experience as a chance to learn.

"We're not egotistical to think he's going to walk over these people who have experience, knowledge. They've proven it and shown it over and over again," Illona Young said. "It's a process. You don't just jump in there. We're not disrespectful of that in any way."

One misconception about Young is he hasn't played the lower-level pro tournaments, the challengers and, even lower, the futures. However, Young is playing those and going far into those tournaments, although he hasn't won a title yet.

"(Bud Collins) said, 'You're Mrs. Young? Why isn't he playing futures?'" Illona Young said. "I said 'He is. Why don't they say that in the media? Why do they say he hasn't won anything?' ... He said 'I'm glad to know that.'"

In the Futures tournaments, Young has reached one semifinal and two quarterfinals this year.

Young has a wild card to play in the U.S. Clay Court Championships this week in Houston, where Andy Roddick is the No. 1 seed and defending champion. However, Young is also taking advantage of his ability to continue to play junior tournaments, which he's doing this week at the Easter Bowl.

"It's nice to go from pros and getting beat, and then go to the juniors and beat someone like you got beat," Young said, laughing.

Last year, Young lost in the quarterfinals of the Easter Bowl to Michael Shabaz 6-2, 7-5. Young said the loss stung so much that he's been thinking about it frequently.

"I came here for the wrong reason. I came to hang out, have fun and talk to everyone. It wasn't to play tennis too much," Young said. "But he played well. He surprised me. I beat him every time last year. For him to come out and play that well surprised me."
 
" 'He's won everything.' " - Ilona Young

"However, Young is playing those and going far into those tournaments, although he hasn't won a title yet."

Ok, I'm confused...anyone else? Seems to be a little bit of denial going on there.
 
I don't think young would do great on the ATP tour. Guys like Nadal and Gasquet will be dominating. Nadal and Gasquet is just 3 years older than him, so there isn't that much in age difference. I also agree with Pmac. I think the ATP level is too high for him right now and the juiors is too easy for him, so he shoud be playing in the futures since he did pretty well at that level.
 
I sure would take the wildcard. And his parents are great, very smart. I'm not saying he will live up to the hype, but he gets points just for playing in the first round. That means, when he is 19, he won't start so low in the rankings and other things. I like that idea!
 
Donald's going to be good, you can't compare Nadal and Gasquet to him because some people take longer to mature.

I think Donald is going to be one of the those guys like Gasquet, that is going to bloom a little bit later and everybody is going to say, WoW, where did this guy come from. Federer was the same way!

You can't just write off his accomplishments as a junior. They are impressive!
 
I think Young should be thrown into the ATP like a Christian to the Lions.
He'll learn the hard way, probably get crushed everytime he meets a Nadal, a Gasquet, a Murray, etc.
 
Young will be a stud on the tour before he is 20 (bank on it).
He is not ready now, but once his body matures and he developes a weapon he will be awesome. I wonder how many on hear have actually seen Donald play or practice. He just oozes talent.
 
if youre good as a junior, it doesnt necessarily mean youll be good in the pro level. i think pmac is right and the truth hurts.

plus, the bollettieri tennis is just good at making future WTA players, with the exception of Haas and Mirnyi (who arent all that "great")....and no, bollettieri didnt create agassi's game
 
3 years is a long time when you're sixteen. He's still got a lot of growing to do, and he is well ahead of the curve age-wise. I think he'll do very well if he keeps focused and doesn't let the attention distract him or set him off course.
 
If Donald is offered wild cards, why shouldn't he play? Even if you lose in the first round, you make money. And get the experience. As his parents point out, he is playing futures and challengers too. IMG is doing its job of lobbying for wild cards based on its influence (I don't necessarily approve of these management firms having so much say). TDs like the crowds which show up for a US junior playing. If they have decided to give a wild card to a US junior, he is the highest ranked junior out there. And exposure in ATP events means better endorsements for him. Even if he fails as a pro, he would have made more than many of us in our entire lives. What is wrong with that? Make hay while the sun shines.

PMac was not all that good himself. No. 4 in doubles and No. 22 in singles, and making quite a bit of money using his brother's clout.
 
Topaz said:
" 'He's won everything.' " - Ilona Young

"However, Young is playing those and going far into those tournaments, although he hasn't won a title yet."

Ok, I'm confused...anyone else? Seems to be a little bit of denial going on there.

Donald has won everything in the junior division. He is the number #1 junior in the world; he has nothing else to prove in the juniors.

He hasn't won a title yet on the ATP tour.
__________________


Dan007 said:
I don't think young would do great on the ATP tour. Guys like Nadal and Gasquet will be dominating. Nadal and Gasquet is just 3 years older than him, so there isn't that much in age difference. I also agree with Pmac. I think the ATP level is too high for him right now and the juiors is too easy for him, so he shoud be playing in the futures since he did pretty well at that level.

Dan, at that level of play, three years is a big difference in physical growth and player development.

This Donald Young bashing is getting really old. The kid has proved himself in the juniors and he is being offered (not buying or selling his soul for) wildcards into big tournaments. On top of that he IS playing satellite events. What in the hell more can you ask of the kid (yes, he is a kid). Who would say "no" to a wildcard into a big tournament?

Just my two cents.
 
sureshs said:
If Donald is offered wild cards, why shouldn't he play? Even if you lose in the first round, you make money. And get the experience. As his parents point out, he is playing futures and challengers too. IMG is doing its job of lobbying for wild cards based on its influence (I don't necessarily approve of these management firms having so much say). TDs like the crowds which show up for a US junior playing. If they have decided to give a wild card to a US junior, he is the highest ranked junior out there. And exposure in ATP events means better endorsements for him. Even if he fails as a pro, he would have made more than many of us in our entire lives. What is wrong with that? Make hay while the sun shines.

PMac was not all that good himself. No. 4 in doubles and No. 22 in singles, and making quite a bit of money using his brother's clout.

and obviously from the valuable experience he is gaining, he is learning to actually win some pro matches!! as if. the management is ridiculous. look at all the negative reaction theyre getting for having their boy go out there to be punished by no-names. theyre just creating a losing personna for him, and dont tell me a loss doesnt hurt your confidence.

if youve 'won everything' in the juniors, then move on to futures and challengers so when you hit the pro tour, you can get good wins and get a good momentum going. his results are pathetic in the pro tour, and no matter what his management is thinking, right now he just looks like a big loser. im glad they arent readily handing out those wild cards to him. theyll just do damage to his career in the long run.
 
DY isn't being offered wildcards, his parents are pressuring his agent to pressure the TD's to give him wildcards, that's a big difference.

DY did not win everything as a Junior and he did not dominate. He had to add a tournament in the last week of the season to clinch the #1 spot. He's only won one Junior Slam, Australia (Monfils won 3 in one year and might have won the 4th if not for a knee injury). DY has played a few Futures tournaments earlier this year making 1 semi and 2 quarters. He has not won a Challenger level match this year.

His development has been rushed and screwed up because of his parents egos. They need to stop pressuring their agent (who sadly doesn't have a pair big enough to stand up to them), and let DY play Futures tournaments where he belongs. They also need to swallow their pride and follow the example that Scoville Jenkins is setting, that's how you develop a tennis player.
 
He's just the next american hope in a sport where good americans are now rare. People are desperate. People can do well in the juniors, then never do much on the real tour.

I think all this attention is going to his head and making him a bit arrogant, and i dont think he will do that well on the ATP tour.
 
i remember tommy haas saying that whenever he was offered a wildcard he never lost in the first round. i think donald should wait until he will make good use of wildcards before he takes them because although he may be the top american junior there are other players who could really use a wildcard here or there.
 
sandiegotennisboy said:
if youve 'won everything' in the juniors, then move on to futures and challengers

But he is playing those, according to others (haven't verified myself).

BTW, are you in San Diego?
 
I take exception to McEnroe's comments and here's why. Mac doesn't know this kid's head. He doesn't know whether he has the right attitude or the wrong attitude or no attitude.

Furthermore, assuming the kid is as mature as he sounds, the losses will be very good for him. Losses are an enormous learning opportunity as we all know. Even at my age, if Mac agreed to play me, I'd be out there hoping to pick up a tip. Will it ruin my fragile ego? :) Er, well, I lost my fragile ego along the way, but to assume this kid has a fragile ego is a big leap of faith.

Even if DY doesn't grow much more, he will be a force on the pro tour by the time he's 20. He seems to be doing just about everything right from what I've read. (which isn't enough, admittedly)

Let's just wish him luck and get off his back. Jealousy is a such a sucky emotion.... :)

-Robert
________
Extreme q vaporizer review
 
Last edited:
He is just a bunch of overhyped crap who hasn't done anything. Dominating the juniors? Dominating the juniors my ass. He's one one Junior GS title. Whoopdedee.
When he wins 3 like Monfils and almost wins 4 then talk. Until then, go play juniors, of which your still losing too.
What a conicited brat, when Roger Federer was 15, you dont see him getting wildcards to every tourney and losing, then claiming that hes still good.
 
Topaz said:
" 'He's won everything.' " - Ilona Young

"However, Young is playing those and going far into those tournaments, although he hasn't won a title yet."

Ok, I'm confused...anyone else? Seems to be a little bit of denial going on there.
yes that also confused me. she has no idea what she is talking about:-| :roll:
 
He is not unbeatable in the juniors. He had some junior losses last year including the U.S Open. So if he is saying juniors is too easy for him he is wrong. There are actually quite a few juniors who hit harder and have a better serve than him, but he wins matches on consistency, guile, and smarts.

He should not try the pro tour until he is ready to do it the hard way. The best way for him to turn pro is to do it the old-fashioned way, play the futures, the challengers, the satellties, enter qualifying draws. Learn to compete against other players of the caliber that have to grind to even get into main tour events, in other words players of the caliber he can compete against. Of course alot of these players are career minor leaguers, he is much different than that, a potentialy very promising young boy. However playing against those players, who are more on par with his current level is what is best for his development. Learning to win those matches, having to fight hard to win those matches and get the points to get close to a top 100 ranking, to play more tour events, is how he will improve most. He will learn to compete, he will learn the physical strength and conditioning it takes, he will learn how to play against men, he will learn how to play important points, he will learn how to manufacture points. He wont learn this as well by playing against people out of his league right now in big tour events with wildcards.
 
Galactus said:
I think Young should be thrown into the ATP like a Christian to the Lions.
He'll learn the hard way, probably get crushed everytime he meets a Nadal, a Gasquet, a Murray, etc.

Yep. I bet that would happen all the time.
 
What are DY's results in futures, satellites, and challengers?

It can't be good for his confidence to get stomped by guys ranked in the +200s.

No more wildcards. DY should have to play his way up like every everybody else. He's had his chances and he has to have gained enough experience to know now to take a (huge) step back and get some wins, earn some points and build his way into the ATP tour.
 
Tennis_Goodness said:
Donald's going to be good, you can't compare Nadal and Gasquet to him because some people take longer to mature.

I think Donald is going to be one of the those guys like Gasquet, that is going to bloom a little bit later and everybody is going to say, WoW, where did this guy come from. Federer was the same way!

You can't just write off his accomplishments as a junior. They are impressive!

You can't even put Young in the same sentence as Nadal and Gasquet, and for sure Gasquet was not a late bloomer.

Gasquet was a late bloomer on the ATP tour, if you call being 18 and getting to the R16 at Wimbledon and the US Open as late results. He was also dominating Spanish satellites on clay and all sorts of futures events at age 15. Not to mention he qualified for Monte Carlo beating Davydenko along the way and then took out Squillari a former French SF in the 1st round.

Nadal I think won a challenger match at age 13 and of course his record speaks for itself.

Donald Young is not really even dominating juniors events; a quick look at the ITF website shows he's won very few events as a junior actually.

Honestly this kid is far from being the best junior to come along in a while; there are lots of kids in South America and Europe that don't even play junior events, only futures that would whip this kid if they showed up to play the same events.
 
Maybe Donald Young, his parents, and his management need to start thinking long-term......

Patrick McEnroe isn't the first one to say that DY has to stop taking wildcards.

Tim Henman said it after he beat DY in Indian Wells. As has Any Roddick.

0-9 is not off to a good start.

If the talent is there, foster it don't force it.
 
I just wanted to add that a double-bagel loss against Carlos Berlocq (1-9 not on the ATP Tour) in Miami is not helping DY's cause.....
 
guernica1 said:
You can't even put Young in the same sentence as Nadal and Gasquet, and for sure Gasquet was not a late bloomer.

Gasquet was a late bloomer on the ATP tour, if you call being 18 and getting to the R16 at Wimbledon and the US Open as late results. He was also dominating Spanish satellites on clay and all sorts of futures events at age 15. Not to mention he qualified for Monte Carlo beating Davydenko along the way and then took out Squillari a former French SF in the 1st round.

Nadal I think won a challenger match at age 13 and of course his record speaks for itself.

Donald Young is not really even dominating juniors events; a quick look at the ITF website shows he's won very few events as a junior actually.

Honestly this kid is far from being the best junior to come along in a while; there are lots of kids in South America and Europe that don't even play junior events, only futures that would whip this kid if they showed up to play the same events.

Amen brother---theres nothing there but marketing hype and so-so results.
 
There is a comment up above sabout Federer not getting wild cards when he was 15 and to that I say :
FEDERER WAS NOT NEAR AS GOOD AS YOUNG AT 15. That's the truth plain and simple. Now Federer's game certainly matured even though he was a little bit of a late bloomer.
 
Fee said:
DY isn't being offered wildcards, his parents are pressuring his agent to pressure the TD's to give him wildcards, that's a big difference.

DY did not win everything as a Junior and he did not dominate. He had to add a tournament in the last week of the season to clinch the #1 spot. He's only won one Junior Slam, Australia (Monfils won 3 in one year and might have won the 4th if not for a knee injury). DY has played a few Futures tournaments earlier this year making 1 semi and 2 quarters. He has not won a Challenger level match this year.

His development has been rushed and screwed up because of his parents egos. They need to stop pressuring their agent (who sadly doesn't have a pair big enough to stand up to them), and let DY play Futures tournaments where he belongs. They also need to swallow their pride and follow the example that Scoville Jenkins is setting, that's how you develop a tennis player.

How are you aware of the interactions between agent and parents?
 
michaellashan said:
Donald has won everything in the junior division. He is the number #1 junior in the world; he has nothing else to prove in the juniors.

He hasn't won a title yet on the ATP tour.
__________________

Really? Has he won the Easter Bowl? All four Grand Slam junior titles?

Mrs. Young wasn't talking about the ATP tour. She said he goes far in all "those" tournaments. Losing in the first round isn't going far. She wasn't talking about ATP tournaments.

So, I guess he hasn't won everything yet, and for some, he does have more to prove.
 
I've never seen this guy play so I can't comment at all. But he lost 6-0 6-0 to a guy that's never won a match who then proceded to lose to Blake 6-0 6-0. I think that says a hell of a lot. Young shouldn't be offended by anything anyone says, he should just be working on his game and fitness.
 
Furthermore, it isn't so much that he's getting the wildcards and accepting them, it is that he is getting them when other, more qualified players who have won ATP matches sometime in their life who deserve them more based on their play and not their agents.
 
The USTA offered Patrick the captains job of the US Davis Cup team after having coached NO ONE ever.

Why didn't he turn it down until he coached some players in Futures and Challengers?

According to his own logic behind Donald Young he should have turned it down, but he didn't. Contradiction? Hypocricy?
 
bigserving said:
The USTA offered Patrick the captains job of the US Davis Cup team after having coached NO ONE ever.

Why didn't he turn it down until he coached some players in Futures and Challengers?

According to his own logic behind Donald Young he should have turned it down, but he didn't. Contradiction? Hypocricy?

Yeah, but he (PMac) had some success on the tour and is part of a very involved tennis family.....and was filling the captain's shoes of his brother.....

I agree, it was still a gamble.....If he doesn't captain a team to the cup soon, he'll be replaced.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fee
DY isn't being offered wildcards, his parents are pressuring his agent to pressure the TD's to give him wildcards, that's a big difference.

DY did not win everything as a Junior and he did not dominate. He had to add a tournament in the last week of the season to clinch the #1 spot. He's only won one Junior Slam, Australia (Monfils won 3 in one year and might have won the 4th if not for a knee injury). DY has played a few Futures tournaments earlier this year making 1 semi and 2 quarters. He has not won a Challenger level match this year.

His development has been rushed and screwed up because of his parents egos. They need to stop pressuring their agent (who sadly doesn't have a pair big enough to stand up to them), and let DY play Futures tournaments where he belongs. They also need to swallow their pride and follow the example that Scoville Jenkins is setting, that's how you develop a tennis player.


How are you aware of the interactions between agent and parents?
-----------------------------------------------------------------


I was curious too. Maybe Fee has some inside info.
 
It was an article published during the Miami tournament. He pretty much said if he didn't do what they wanted, they would find another agent. I'm still trying to find it, but it looks like the link has expired.
 
Just checked the Easter bowl draw and DY got taken to 3 sets by some kid named McNaughton who's ranked #8 in SoCal. It's not like he's kicking these kids' asses 6-0, 6-0 like Berlocq did to him a few weeks ago. It's not a slam dunk that he'll win this tournament this year.
 
bigserving said:
The USTA offered Patrick the captains job of the US Davis Cup team after having coached NO ONE ever.

Why didn't he turn it down until he coached some players in Futures and Challengers?

According to his own logic behind Donald Young he should have turned it down, but he didn't. Contradiction? Hypocricy?


There is a HUGE difference between being a captain of a Davis team and a personal coach for a teenager or any player for that matter. Completely different skill sets. By the time they get to the Davis Cup, the players are already developed. They are the best the USA hads to offer. They are at their peak and all are generally top 10 or at least top 50 players. The Davis Cup captain's job is to convince the best players available to play, set up matchups so they can get the most favorable outcomes. Sure there may be a little in game strategy and coaching going on, but it is not going to be about how to hit a forehand. A high level former pro player is almost certainly going to be the choice. Respect is key or else you are not going to get people like Sampras, Roddick and others to play for you.

A nobody who coached low level ATP players is not going to be chosen as Davis Cup Captain under almost any circumstance. I don't see a contradiction at all.
 
Fee said:
It was an article published during the Miami tournament. He pretty much said if he didn't do what they wanted, they would find another agent. I'm still trying to find it, but it looks like the link has expired.

Don't blindly believe everything you read in the papers or any other publication for that matter. They tend to totally miss nuance and context. Furthermore, sources and agendas are regularly suspect. I read almost everything with a healthy dose of scepticism. Unfortunately, most people don't, which is why our governments can get away with the crap they do.
 
sureshs said:
If Donald is offered wild cards, why shouldn't he play? Even if you lose in the first round, you make money. And get the experience. As his parents point out, he is playing futures and challengers too. IMG is doing its job of lobbying for wild cards based on its influence (I don't necessarily approve of these management firms having so much say). TDs like the crowds which show up for a US junior playing. If they have decided to give a wild card to a US junior, he is the highest ranked junior out there. And exposure in ATP events means better endorsements for him. Even if he fails as a pro, he would have made more than many of us in our entire lives. What is wrong with that? Make hay while the sun shines.

Because it's a waste of time and it screws someone else, who is more deserving, out of a WC.

I say it's a waste of time because instead of getting his butt handed to him and just playing one match in a week, he could be out playing a futures event winning some matches and actually playing during that week. I know I'd much rather PLAY in a week than be on court for a match for like an hour while getting the crap kicked outta me. Granted I'm not DY so we obviously don't want the same things.... And yes, it does give him some "experience", but how much experience is he actually going to get for as little time as he spends on court (in the tour level tourneys)?

And there are many more (young) Americans who are waaay more deserving. I mean there's Scoville Jenkins, Alex Kuznetsov, Brendan Evans, etc... who've all won sets or matches at the tour level. DY aint even been close to winning a set (well there is one time I can remember where I think he may have had a set point which was at the US Open last year in the 1st set of his 1st round match) yet.

So I guess I say he should just play mostly futures (and maybe a few challengers once he starts to win more matches at the futures level) and take 2 or 3 of the WCs he's offered and let the rest go to people who deserve them.

Oh, also, pro tennis isn't all just about making money.;)
 
Found it. (By the way, David L, since you are new to this board, I'm not in the habit of 'blindly believing everything I read'. I hope in time you'll come to give me credit for being a little bit more intelligent than that and I in turn will treat all of your posts with the skepticism that you advocate).

Wertheim's Mailbag...
In Key Biscayne, Carlos Berlocq beat Donald Young 6-0, 6-0, then lost by the same score in the next round. Has that ever happened to any other player in the Open era? Any chance it will convince IMG and tournament owners that instead of giving wild cards to Young at this stage in his career, they should go to players who have enough experience to benefit from them, perhaps a player such as Scoville Jenkins?
-- A.K. Stokes, Anchorage

Greg Sharko, whose tennis cortex should be available for purchase at Hold Everything, believes that this is a first. Not only is the back-to-back double bagel for Berlocq -- first as the humiliator, then as the humiliated -- an amazing coincidence, but it also lays bare just how much of a work in progress Young is.

There were a lot of questions about Young and a lot of criticism of his handlers from you guys this week. It's been obvious for two years now that while Young is a bright junior prospect -- made all the more intriguing by his lefty game and his unconventional backstory -- he is a boy against men on the pro tour.

For all the glib lines about "learning experiences," it's hard to see what there is to be gained when a 16-year-old gets double-bageled by a qualifier. This the ninth straight wild card the kid -- and he is a kid -- has been gifted without winning a set. This is precisely the kind of short-sighted, clumsy mismanagement that burns out players, splinters a kid's confidence and gives tennis a reputation for eating its young.

The lukewarm defense of Young's agent goes like this: "The family is giving me heat to get him in the main draws; if I don't do it, I lose the client."

Granted, it's easy to pontificate from my position (immune to the pressures of working for Teddy Forstmann), but why not take the high road? Explain that Young, while an undeniable talent and a dynamic kid, simply isn't ready for the ATP, much the same way an eighth-grade math prodigy isn't ready for college.

"If you disagree, I encourage you to find new representation, and I wish you the best of luck." Seems to me that, ultimately, being known as the guy who lost Young because he wasn't willing to rush him onto the big stage isn't the worst reputation an agent could have.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2006/writers/jon_wertheim/03/29/mailbag/1.html
 
Fee said:
Found it. (By the way, David L, since you are new to this board, I'm not in the habit of 'blindly believing everything I read'. I hope in time you'll come to give me credit for being a little bit more intelligent than that and I in turn will treat all of your posts with the skepticism that you advocate).

No offense meant, and I would'nt ask for anything less.
 
The DY story will be indicativ of all that is cynical about the game. It's all about the bejamins. DY gets paid benjamins for all those losses so he's going to keep taking them if they are offered. He has not won the French, US Open and Wimbledon juniors. His has no weapons besides his speed. He hits high rally ball topspiners and tend to be a pusher/ counterpuncher. This style can lead one to be the top junior in the world but does not say anything abount being a successful pro. Yes he is still developing but this deal with the devil will only teach him how to lose. It won't be any fun anymore and he will be out of the game by 21 without much success, IMO.
 
Those darn black players getting preferential treatment

sandiegotennisboy said:
he wont make it on the pro tour.

This forum is filled with arm chair analysis.

i remember watching a 14 year newly turned pro, venus williams, playing all-time great steffi graf at the manhattan beach women's tournament in california years ago. she was routed by graf 6-1, 6-4. you could see that she had a lot of potential but venus was very erratic and raw.

after the match, her "crazy" father said he was pleased with how well venus played? the press had a field day complaining that venus was "all-hype", hadn't even played any junior tennis before turning pro, didn't deserve any wildcards, and implied that she was only getting them because she was black.

fast forward ten years

donald young turns pro at 15 and like the williams family, takes a somewhat unothodox approach to developing his career by, continuing to play the juniors while simultaneously accepting wild cards into top atp events only to get stomped on. his "crazy" parents say that they are pleased with what he's learning, that just the experience alone of his one-sided losses is great preparation for his future tour career, and that they are not worried about him taking a beating to his confidence.

likewise, everyone complains that he shouldn't be accepting wildcards because he doesn't deserve them and like venus, imply that he is only getting them because he's black.

the moral of the story is, noone can predict with any degree of accuracy, how everything will turn out for donald young.

unorthodox approaches (not playing junior tennis at all like venus and serena or having dual careers as a junior and tour pro via wildcards) alway seem unorthodox (just a fancy word for crazy) UNTIL, 20 grand slams later, everyone has to finally admit that "wow, once again, billy jean king was right - being a champion is not about taking the conventional road but rather, the road less traveled".
 
Back
Top