If a young gen wins? "Something else?"If Nadal gets Berrettini in his half, then A.
If Fed happens to beat either Nadal or Djokovic, then also A.
If Djokovic wins, then again A.
If Fed loses, then B.
If Nadal makes a deep run, then also B.
If Djokovic makes a deep run, then again B.
If Fed gets a single night match, then C.
If Nadal loses the final, then also C; we can't have that extra day of rest ruining things.
If the AO organizers pull an RG in Djokovic's semi, then again C.
If Fed plays under a roof, then D.
If Nadal plays under a roof, then also D.
If Djokovic plays under a roof, then again D.
Ifwhen a women's match is played, then E.
Has to be court, with the new court surface. Anybody can complain since it could be an "advantage" or "disadvantage" depending on their results.
That being said, this reminds me, doesn't the owner of Greenset have a brother named Emilio Sanchez? Who happened to be Rafa's coach during DC?
@octobrina10
That would be A.If a young gen wins? "Something else?"
He is asking what type of surface Rafa wants for AO in that picture.Lol it's Rogi's buddy Tiley who runs the tourney.
Who could that be?Some people will whine about who the crowd cheer for.
Those who don't cheer for a certain player will be labelled disgusting and disgraceful.
Some people will whine about who the crowd cheer for.
Those who don't cheer for a certain player will be labelled disgusting and disgraceful.
But honestly it is not just against Fed this happens. It happens in any match this "supposed" person is playing. Do you recall USO against Wawa?it’s not about cheering for a specific player, it’s about not being disrespectful towards those players that are against your favorite just for this reason
If Nadal gets Berrettini in his half, then A.
If Fed happens to beat either Nadal or Djokovic, then also A.
If Djokovic wins, then again A.
If Fed loses, then B.
If Nadal makes a deep run, then also B.
If Djokovic makes a deep run, then again B.
If Fed gets a single night match, then C.
If Nadal loses the final, then also C; we can't have that extra day of rest ruining things.
If the AO organizers pull an RG in Djokovic's semi, then again C.
If Fed plays under a roof, then D.
If Nadal plays under a roof, then also D.
If Djokovic plays under a roof, then again D.
Ifwhen a women's match is played, then E.
But honestly it is not just against Fed this happens. It happens in any match this "supposed" person is playing. Do you recall USO against Wawa?
So it seems to be aimed at one person and not coming from just one fan base.
it’s not about cheering for a specific player, it’s about not being disrespectful towards those players that are against your favorite just for this reason
Djokovic bores me to tears, regardless of who he is playing.
To cheer for tennis I find boring would be disingenuous.
yes, I don’t know what to answer you, really. I simply don’t understand this universal dislike certain crowds have for Djokovic, and I never will probably.
every time I ask someone and get an answer, they seem like really petty reasons and it still seems undeserved.
Well, it is just classless acts and no other way to describe it. I dislike the tennis player, but it is disgusting that it will be silence when Djoker does the incredible things he does on court.yes, I don’t know what to answer you, really. I simply don’t understand this universal dislike certain crowds have for Djokovic, and I never will probably.
every time I ask someone and get an answer, they seem like really petty reasons and it still seems undeserved.
again, I’m not saying you need to cheer for him
It's quite simple, many people like attacking tennis with flair. That's not Djokovic's game. He is a retriever, a great one. He doesn't attack and come to the net to finish and will generally wait for an unforced error, rather than seize the initiative. The fact that he then celebrates his opponent's error unfortunately does not endear him to many people. Yes, he may be celebrating his retrieving, but you can't cry about the crowd celebrating a Djoko-error when it's his MO.
I will say, he does not help his cause by cursing at the crowd and other instances that turn the crowd off to him. But which came first? The chicken or egg theory.It's quite simple, many people like attacking tennis with flair. That's not Djokovic's game. He is a retriever, a great one. He doesn't attack and come to the net to finish and will generally wait for an unforced error, rather than seize the initiative. The fact that he then celebrates his opponent's error unfortunately does not endear him to many people. Yes, he may be celebrating his retrieving, but you can't cry about the crowd celebrating a Djoko-error when it's his MO.
he gets booed even when he approaches umpire with an innocent question
he gets booed if he’s forced to retire
his rallies of serve routines gets interrupted by shouting or whistling
It's quite simple, many people like attacking tennis with flair. That's not Djokovic's game. He is a retriever, a great one. He doesn't attack and come to the net to finish and will generally wait for an unforced error, rather than seize the initiative. The fact that he then celebrates his opponent's error unfortunately does not endear him to many people. Yes, he may be celebrating his retrieving, but you can't cry about the crowd celebrating a Djoko-error when it's his MO.
For some reason I have never been a tennis highlight guy. If I miss the match, all I care about is the score. Tennis highlights to me are so out of context.Way too short highlight videos.
Not much whine there, even though this would be more justified than the already mentioned, more frequent examples.
Nadal is bae
and he’ll be so epic
you better slay
and chicken wings you must lick!
I was so right. Over a month before the tournament starts and the whining has started already.
Lots of players get those reactions .. and they all bring it upon themselves.
He beats your fave. Point blank and the period. This is why you and the 75% of the people that attend Djokovic versus Federer matches don't like him. Oh, and that he dominated and took away the mantle. I don't know why people just won't be honest when they come up with all these BS reasons, especially when the guy's records across the board are off the charts. You probably would feel better after getting it off your chest.
Federer's servebotting
Nicholas Hilmy Kyrgios' mere existance
Someone tanking a professional match to avoid a H2H matchup that an internet forum cherishes more than the players themselves do
Handwringerers versus Optimists
An entire match thread roasting Federer in which he ended up winning in straight sets
Nadal's moonballing and returning from Mallorca
Nadals wedding causing lack of motivation if he loses
Djokovic's defense
Federers break point conversion
Del Potro possuming
Berdych being retired
AndyM being banned
Stan being simultaneously fit and fat
Aren't we all guilty of some of these?To answer the OP's question, everything. They will complain about the surface, the draws, what someone is wearing, the schedules (ok I'm a little guilty of this one in the past), the celebrations (already started, read the thread), the sun, the moon, the gum on their shoe, the stick up their ..., etc.
It's mostly about having the chance to look back at the best points that the match delivered, whether the match was missed live or not. And generally I am not patient enough to watch something in full if it was already played.For some reason I have never been a tennis highlight guy. If I miss the match, all I care about is the score. Tennis highlights to me are so out of context.
If it's not live I don't have the patience either. Especially if I know the outcome, which due to my lack of patience... I will.It's mostly about having the chance to look back at the best points that the match delivered, whether the match was missed live or not. And generally I am not patient enough to watch something in full if it was already played.
And most of his fans are just as unlikable as he is. Mature adults say what they think and feel. Djokovic fans continually tell others what they think and feel. It's a reflection of your own self worth, not mine.
I like Tsitsipas and Dimitrov. That's 2 out of the 3 people who beat him in slams this year.
Aren't we all guilty of some of these?
Hey not meAren't we all guilty of some of these?
I can honestly say I have never complained about scheduling. Now court speeds (which is always pure speculation based on outcomes I don't like) I have issues with.Lol yes.
I can bet that the people saying that couldn't get their fingers out of a bowling ball if it were stucksimultaneously complaining about Stan being fat and about people saying he’s fat
I can honestly say I have never complained about scheduling. Now court speeds (which is always pure speculation based on outcomes I don't like) I have issues with.
I can bet that the people saying that couldn't get their fingers out of a bowling ball if it were stuck
Is it just me, or is Stan looking a little fat around the tummy? He's definitely heavier than he should be.
That would be no problem. Stan is clearly out of shape and fat. Fed would beat him with little trouble.
Um... "fat?" Stanimal has a better bod than 99.9% of all dudes on planet earth!
Now where are those people claiming Stan is "fat?" Look the dude, he's built like a Mack truck.
Shame that Federer's supporters don't follow his example of likability, like us immature adults do it with our disgraceful provocative talentless pusher.And most of his fans are just as unlikable as he is. Mature adults say what they think and feel. Djokovic fans continually tell others what they think and feel. It's a reflection of your own self worth, not mine.
I like Tsitsipas and Dimitrov. That's 2 out of the 3 people who beat him in slams this year.
Haha he has got screwed with the courts though. What are rafa fan complaints? Umpires? Draws?You are a Federer fan, so of course you have complained about court speed. Kidding...sort of...lol. Not surprising that I'm a Djokovic fan and complained about the scheduling. Touche.