Meh. Looks a lot to me like Mannarino's forehand. I wouldn't worry too much about it.About a year ago, I tried to learn from the Ricc Macci "ATP-forehand", keeping the backswing compact. After a few months I noticed that I had lost some power in my shots, and my coach was saying regularly that I swing too close to my body.
After filming my forehands for the first time in half a year, I saw that I had made some misinterpretation/mal-adaptations of the ATP forehand. I could see that I had NO BACKSWING, I just drop the racket down after the unit turn. with a slightly bent racket arm "in front".
I know that 99% of all youtube coaches (like Jeff Salzeinstein) says amateurs should shorten the backswing not enlargen it, but I feel my backswing is non-existent/too short now, since I can feel I lost some pop in my forehands compared to my previous technique.
After that I've been filming my forehands like 5-10 times in the last month, and I can't for the love of god extend my arm out to create a bigger backswing, it's still bent through the whole backswing. Feels like syntax error not being able to correct it.
Anybody else had this problem? How much backswing is the right amount?
i'm flattered you'd grant me even 10 minutes, ty!My thoughts? The only reason it would take 10 minutes is because you guys are slow learners.
a) This is about monetization strategy.My thoughts? The only reason it would take 10 minutes is because you guys are slow learners.
Need to revive the POMO, 2 Hand Forehand, Wall guy, and TTPS threads. Seems fitting.
No shortage of people willing to get on the wrong side of this discussion.i'm flattered you'd grant me even 10 minutes, ty!
You can share what you have privately. I’m open to try what you suggest, but may not be giving instant feedback, still cautious with my back recovery…No shortage of people willing to get on the wrong side of this discussion.
I’d be happy with you as guinea pig.You can share what you have privately. I’m open to try what you suggest, but may not be giving instant feedback, still cautious with my back recovery…
We call them “under-experiment rabbit” in RussianI’d be happy with you as guinea pig.
When I first learned my private coach encouraged me to point with my elbow or opposite hand, for whatever reason it made the backswing more natural for meAbout a year ago, I tried to learn from the Ricc Macci "ATP-forehand", keeping the backswing compact. After a few months I noticed that I had lost some power in my shots, and my coach was saying regularly that I swing too close to my body.
After filming my forehands for the first time in half a year, I saw that I had made some misinterpretation/mal-adaptations of the ATP forehand. I could see that I had NO BACKSWING, I just drop the racket down after the unit turn. with a slightly bent racket arm "in front".
I know that 99% of all youtube coaches (like Jeff Salzeinstein) says amateurs should shorten the backswing not enlargen it, but I feel my backswing is non-existent/too short now, since I can feel I lost some pop in my forehands compared to my previous technique.
After that I've been filming my forehands like 5-10 times in the last month, and I can't for the love of god extend my arm out to create a bigger backswing, it's still bent through the whole backswing. Feels like syntax error not being able to correct it.
Anybody else had this problem? How much backswing is the right amount?
I’ll make a short video for you to watch. You won’t use it for any purpose other than your own?We call them “under-experiment rabbit” in Russian
He doesn’t. Neither do you. If you are still working on the hitting the ball part of the stroke, you are doing it wrong.How does this work when the guinea pig already knows what to do?
I trust him.How come only Dragy gets to see?
Don't worry I'm not working on the hitting the ball part of the stroke.He doesn’t. Neither do you. If you are still working on the hitting the ball part of the stroke, you are doing it wrong.
Why is Dragy more trustworthy than Cherlos? Have you forgotten about Cherlos?I trust him.
Who?Why is Dragy more trustworthy than Cherlos? Have you forgotten about Cherlos?
Always note the author of a thread you are posting in.Who?
The OP of this thread. The guy that was asking for helpWho?
About a year ago, I tried to learn from the Ricc Macci "ATP-forehand", keeping the backswing compact
looks like the backswing i strive for when i'm returning big serves (hand "patting the dog" in front of your chest at 90 degrees)
try "patting the dog" with your *hand* 45 degrees behind you (if your chest is facing the side fence)
Everybody will get helped.The OP of this thread. The guy that was asking for help
I have no idea just post the video already.Who?
Every ATP pro utilizes the same technique (with the possible exception of Medvedev). One of the above is doing it correctly, the other isn’t. Wanna guess who has a clue?Because their technique is different therefore it looks different. Now let's see that video.
Yeah, sure. Will try to get what you suggest and give feedback.I’ll make a short video for you to watch. You won’t use it for any purpose other than your own?
i imagine his groundstrokes will be the model for generations to come... the price of being the goat.How would you gauge Djokovic takeback? Is it big?
Well that’s tricky:i imagine his groundstrokes will be the model for generations to come... the price of being the goat.
It is so simple and clean looking.Well that’s tricky:
- Not many consider his FH as best model. Despite it actually is very-very good.
- He uses quite a heavy and high-SW racquet compared to what youngsters use (and where industry shifted). Which has its effect on the technique. Try to hit exactly like Nole with Alcaraz “stock” racquet, and it’s quite possible you aren’t going anywhere high in rankings.
But back to the question, how big is his backswing on your scale, from 1 to 10?
I don’t think his racket inversion is that simple and clean.It is so simple and clean looking.
what's you criteria fo "backswing"... eg. how far hadn goes back? how much flip the racquet does and/or how much the racquet tip travels?Well that’s tricky:
- Not many consider his FH as best model. Despite it actually is very-very good.
- He uses quite a heavy and high-SW racquet compared to what youngsters use (and where industry shifted). Which has its effect on the technique. Try to hit exactly like Nole with Alcaraz “stock” racquet, and it’s quite possible you aren’t going anywhere high in rankings.
But back to the question, how big is his backswing on your scale, from 1 to 10?
simplest and cleanest is agassi imo... his technique (imo/from reading) allowed him to play closer to the baseline than other baseliners.It is so simple and clean looking.
No, my friend, I’m asking what’s your definition, frankly interested what you were talking about here. Where the barrier?for kids/beginners, i've had to put barriers in place to prevent them from taking a big backswing
i agree the inversion is not simple... and arguable everyone develops their own amount of inversion on their own... (eg. with kyrgios/sock being on the extreme end)I don’t think his racket inversion is that simple and clean.
I don’t think his racket inversion is that simple and clean.
They look basically the same to me.simplest and cleanest is agassi imo... his technique (imo/from reading) allowed him to play closer to the baseline than other baseliners.
simple and clean did not give him a ton of topspin (brody book?), therefore less margin, but does require a high level of skill to execute consistently
No, my friend, I’m asking what’s your definition, frankly interested what you were talking about here. Where the barrier?
So basically no taking the racquet behind the torso plane?(but don't usually have a chair handy, to sit in)
usually resort to just using the ball basket or net to prevent racquet from going back too far.
i'm not a stickler for that... more to prevent kids from winding up like their trying to throw a shotputSo basically no taking the racquet behind the torso plane?
See I don't give a **** whatever inversion Djokovic does with the racquet the rest of it is basically a perfect model of how to move.i'm not a stickler for that... more to prevent kids from winding up like their trying to throw a shotput
OkSee I don't give a **** whatever inversion Djokovic does with the racquet the rest of it is basically a perfect model of how to move.
well djokovic shows that boundary of movement quite well
Haven’t sent it yet. Getting my friend’s ball machine to make a hitting video for Dragy first. It will help to have credibility before he takes the leap.@Dragy
How much were you impressed by BMG’s video? I guess saying that much won’t violate the copyright contract!
All good. Will you send the video to me as well? I doubt anyone deserves it more than I do given the history between us!Haven’t sent it yet. Getting my friend’s ball machine to make a hitting video for Dragy first. It will help to have credibility before he takes the leap.
Care to make disparaging comments before this all happens?
No! You deserve nothing and will get it.All good. Will you send the video to me as well? I doubt anyone deserves it more than I do given the history between us!
It here being nothing I presume.No! You deserve nothing and will get it.
Yeah @ballmachineguy it's pretty much the same as the serve, you are bringing the racquet up to meet the ball at a certain calculated point of contact.Don't worry I'm not working on the hitting the ball part of the stroke.