Come on. All these tennis players are the same including the women. They all have anger management issues. Have you seen the way Serena Williams have reacted on the court towards umpires and lineswomen? Let's not even talk about Medvedev's treatment of the ball kids, Tsitsipas assaulting his own father with his racquet, Safin going ballistic, etc, etc. Even Nadal was cursing in Spanish and then confronted the umpire for being given a warning for foul language. Nadal didn't realize that one of the linespeople spoke SpanishHe seems to have anger management issues. Hmm...... maybe there's actually something real behind those domestic abuse allegations....
That's a lot different than violence toward an official. There's a difference between getting heated during an intense match and not being able to control yourself and resorting to violence. This is a bit beyond swatting a ball or breaking a racquet or arguing with an umpire.Come on. All these tennis players are the same including the women. They all have anger management issues. Have you seen the way Serena Williams have reacted on the court towards umpires and lineswomen? Let's not even talk about Medvedev's treatment of the ball kids, Tsitsipas assaulting his own father with his racquet, Safin going ballistic, etc, etc. Even Nadal was cursing in Spanish and then confronted the umpire for being given a warning for foul language. Nadal didn't realize that one of the linespeople spoke Spanish
You’re missing the point. Defaulting him and a fine that means nothing to a rich man is not the right message. A penalty that hurts is the way to go.
Minimalising thuggish aggressive behaviour is not a good look.
The guy is obviously OK w/using physical force on people who upset him. So the DV stuff is now a lot easier to believe.
Players need to be held accountable for their actions. This is lacking on court and in our daily lives as of late.Why is it that tennis of all sports allows such thug behavior towards referees. Imagine a player doing something similar in a sport like rugby. He´d be happy not to be banned for life. Yet in tennis it is allowed without any real consequences. The whole sport is so rotten it is unbelievable. What is most sickening is how the spectators, mainly kids, are still begging for his racket after the incident.
Tickets to such matches ought to come with headphones for minors; in some cases with blinders as well.I once attended a Connors-McEnroe match in Scotland and the language they used was extraordinary.
Now that we're talking about an adult entertainment thereThe language isn't the problem. Even Sharapova has used salty language. Don't you remember her infamous "allez up your f*ck!ng a$s" line? It's the blatant violence towards an official.
So glad Thiem saved tennis in 2020.
Again I think his departure for some time would be a positive thing for all concerned parties. However in the end of the day he missed the umpire so I don't think a suspension is warranted. As it stands, players who have actually hit refs/umpires in the eye/throat haven't been banned/suspended at all so doing this to Zverev would be somewhat unfair. I think it was more than fair to DQ him from the tournament FWIW.
Zverev is very talented and a great player and fun to watch IMO.
He couldnt challenge the call? All this over a 500 level doubles match?
He hit the umpire's chair. He didn't hit the umpire. Shapovalov hit the umpire in the eye with a tennis ball. That was far worse.
This is the last time I'll be responding to one of these as this is getting exhausting. Please see my previous responses which I have quoted here:"he missed the umpire"...really? That is your bar? The umpire didn't know if the next strike was going to hit him and he likely would have been hit if he hadn't reacted by raising his feet.
This was major physical intimidation with possible harm. But, yeah, 'he missed'.
He absolutely deserves a suspension. In what other sport would this be allowed? Why should an umpire fear for his physical safety?
If you say so. I'll be the last person to defend Zverev if such action was taken. I'm just saying I don't think it'll happen
Look, there's no need to get so aggressive here, I wasn't defending Zverev or supporting him in any way.
In fact, I think you may have missed the larger point which I was trying to make here, which is that while Zverev's temporary departure from the game would be a good thing for everyone, I do not believe the ATP will take such action based on what I've seen them do up until now. That's all, no need to get so hostile over it.
This is the last time I'll be responding to one of these as this is getting exhausting. Please see my previous responses which I have quoted here:
Now, seriously, and this goes to anyone reading this (not just those who quoted me after I had already made responses to others):
Please, it is important to learn to read through things before going on self-righteous rampages. Reading through everything allows one to see any further responses and allows one to either be satisfied by them or disagree with them (and then quote that). Now that you have quoted me here, I cannot know which it is and this makes the task of corresponding and explaining myself again and again very arduous and tiring. If you don't feel like reading through all the way, then don't respond as if you know fully what's going on. I get that on sites like these it's easy to misunderstand or get triggered by things and immediately run to the keyboard but seriously if you're already spending time on here at least spend it correctly and check that what you're writing/responding to isn't obsolete.
Sincerely,
Tired of people @-ing me with the same stuff.
@gogo totally slaying like a boss!Sorry I inconvenienced you.
I read a few pages further and didn't see anyone calling you out. So I did. I thought it was a valid point.
And now I see that you are saying that you weren't defending him. But I don't see you justifying your view that he shouldn't be suspended.
I, just like you, don't want to go through pages and pages of comments looking to see if you did say something else. Do you stand by your comment that Zed doesn't deserve suspension?
Thank you for saving me time.
I think everyone on this thread (except overt trolls) would agree with you. Felix is a nice guy and indeed, an incredible role model.I'm thrilled that Felix is doing well. I'd still stand for him even in weakness as he is an incredible role model. He respects others and works hard. He's a much, much better role model than Zverev.
I don’t know about this specific case, and I didn’t watch the match, but when I’m watching football, there are many instances where I feel I would love to punch the referee in the face.
Amazing with how ease the "heat of the moment" excuse is used... As if it excused anything.Courier shook the umpires chair in anger at 1993 Miami. It was a big deal for like a day(no twitter etc where everyone in the world saw this footage of a doubles match on court 3 seconds after it ended ). ESPN crew acted like he should be banned for life for like 5 minutes and then forgot about it. Players were lucky then(match wasn't even televised in the US, but they showed the clip during the following day's coverage). I'm always amazed at how Courier is now some lovable member of the media now(who will no doubt be "appalled" by Zverev)
he even said this afterwards, can you imagine?? and people say today's players are tone deaf, clueless etc...
"I had a poor performance and he had a poor performance in the chair," said an unrepentant Courier. "It happened in the heat of the moment; I don't regret anything."
TENNIS; Double-Up and Out For No. 1 Courier (Published 1993)
www.nytimes.com
I think everyone on this thread (except overt trolls) would agree with you. Felix is a nice guy and indeed, an incredible role model.
Ha ha..those were the days.I once attended a Connors-McEnroe match in Scotland and the language they used was extraordinary.
Weinstein left his role based off the investigation of NYT and other media outlets, not after the police found him guilty. So I am not holding Zverev to an unrealistic standard. Rather you are almost begging players to hit the umpire because anything short of it, no matter how dangerous, is peanuts to you. I do understand that if you address this thread from a position of extreme fanboism for Zverev, everybody else looks like 'haters' to you even when we're just pointing out that what he did was way more dangerous than Djokovic. YOU would agree if you were in that chair but you weren't so you are sitting pretty and defending that git.Sorry but all this is biased on your negative opinion you had of Zverev before.
1. Tsonga had all this achieved (minus Olympics and Finals) at 35, Zverev is 24 and counting - you know why he would be considered more successful. I would also consider him more successful than Tsitsipas at this point, making him no.2. But apart from that, being top 5 for that time earns you some hype.
2. There is an investigation ongoing. Just like you probably would wish in case of yourself, there will be an announcement once there is conclusive evidence. Weinstein is a dumb comparison, as he was a serial offender where evidence was actively withheld or destroyed. With Zverev there are two stories and investigators will check which one is true, bear in mind that a court ruling has kept Rothenberg from talking about this already, so it doesn't seem bullet proof right now as was Weinstein's case.
3. I am 100% sure he didn't mean to hit the referee, that's the most ridiculous point in your argumentation here. He might have neglected the risk and generally, swinging at the chair is just a complete rubbish move - but it's not like he wanted to actively hit him.
I understand you guys hate him - I can see why - but to now all run for almost murder charges is beyond ridiculous. Let him be fined, he was defaulted and then let's see what happens
If you don't wanna read all the replies to ensure you aren't replying in a way that's reptetitive, please don't do so in the future. At the very least, not with me...Sorry I inconvenienced you.
I read a few pages further and didn't see anyone calling you out. So I did. I thought it was a valid point.
And now I see that you are saying that you weren't defending him. But I don't see you justifying your view that he shouldn't be suspended.
I, just like you, don't want to go through pages and pages of comments looking to see if you did say something else. Do you stand by your comment that Zed doesn't deserve suspension?
Thank you for saving me time.
Everyone always says the sport needs villains. Not a bunch of fake goody 2 shoes all pretending to be friends. Now that you get a few good villains, people are whining and moaningAnd, your point is...??
This should allow him to physically intimidate an official?? Who cares whether he is talented or not.
Stop being an enabler.
Not as good as this one from Mac.
ABZ in utter ruins if you're rightProbably won’t be suspended
Alexander Zverez fined $40k, loses prize money and ranking points after outburst in Mexican Open
ATP will conduct further review of Zverevs actions in Mexico and German could yet face further sanctions after being fined, losing his prize money and being docked ranking points; world No 3 struck umpires chair four times in Acapulco and was booted out of the tournamentwww.skysports.com
The large amount of money they have earned has made them insensitive towards others.What. A. Tool. I've heard from multiple people that zverev is a nightmare to work with. completely arrogant. always late to practices. The way that some of these guys (kyrgios, zverev, shapo, meddy) talk to umpires is 100 percent disrespectful and hard to watch. No one holds them accountable. Sad.
Ball looked in too..
He is not a villain but an *******!Everyone always says the sport needs villains. Not a bunch of fake goody 2 shoes all pretending to be friends. Now that you get a few good villains, people are whining and moaning
Too close for comfort though. Another smack and the racquet could have wrapped around the metal.The point is people want him to receive a penalty as if he legit attacked the guy. He hit a chair
His penalty seems excessive, if anything, at 70k plus ranking points.
Excessive?
The fine is but a tiny blip for him.
A suspension is needed unless @atptour doesn't care for rules or their employees. NO official should EVER be intimidated like this.
That you think it was excessive (this fine is modest in terms of Zed's earnings) tells us everything we need to know about you. It is apparently open season on tennis officials.
Come on. All these tennis players are the same including the women. They all have anger management issues. Have you seen the way Serena Williams have reacted on the court tow"ards umpires and lineswomen? Let's not even talk about Medvedev's treatment of the ball kids, Tsitsipas assaulting his own father with his racquet, Safin going ballistic, etc, etc. Even Nadal was cursing in Spanish and then confronted the umpire for being given a warning for foul language. Nadal didn't realize that one of the linespeople spoke Spanish