This is also not a discussion that you say he is right and nothing more... I just stated that the mold is different and this is clearly visible at the throat.
Zverev playing the gravity or just a PJ
- Thread starter TomTennis495
- Start date
Because you don't understand that I'm at least trying to show you any kind of proof while you do not. Just saying "I know because he told me" is what any of us can put here. Gravity is different shape racquet than hers and it is not 1% difference invisible in any pic. But you have not even compared them so..
dr325i
G.O.A.T.
What??Give me an evidence that she switched or at least any source why you claim that.
For me even the throat part over the grip looks looks different than gravity:
Looks like IG speed.
Gravity has very little throat space over the grip while IG is much longer and sunken.
The space (length) above grip is identical and "sunken" too. There is pretty much no difference between those two. Not sure what are you really seeing there.
Head Graphene 360+ Gravity Pro Racquet
www.tennis-warehouse.com
Zoom on to GPro stroat if necessary.
Rodrigo Tonini da Silva
New User
Barty is stillusing her old speed mold but Zeverev and Rublev they both using the new gravity mold. Check the grommets at 6 point in these pics and you can see the difference. Once you enlarge the pics it’s very clear that Zeverev and Rublev are using the same grommet design as the new gravity style (a little box which hide all the strings inside) and Barty is using the traditional style head grommets.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
what is the ruble string??
am1899
Legend
Adrenaline
moon shot
Hall of Fame
McEncock
Professional
dr325i
G.O.A.T.
Faris
Professional
You really do need reading glasses don't you? LOL. Or maybe just cherry picking some posts?
dr325i
G.O.A.T.
Can you again point me to the differences in images of retail frames side by side I posted above???You really do need reading glasses don't you? LOL. Or maybe just cherry picking some posts?
One of us definitely needs vision checked. So far, Head racket drawings also show no difference...
I love how you shared the pics with obvious difference stating they are the same@sanister
Both of these are retail frames.
Nevertheless, there is absolutely no difference in mold between the retail and pro stock versions....unless you are seeing the difference there too
sanister
Professional
I only know of retail versions and have not seen prostock versions. And I am claiming what I am simply because I own the two and have them infront of me@sanister
Both of these are retail frames.
Nevertheless, there is absolutely no difference in mold between the retail and pro stock versions....unless you are seeing the difference there too
dr325i
G.O.A.T.
But can you point me to the differences in my attachments. Both are retail. I simply do not see any difference except the glossy paint. Again, if needed, I can sand it downI only know of retail versions and have not seen prostock versions. And I am claiming what I am simply because I own the two and have them infront of me
sanister
Professional
Scroll up and read before jumping the gun on hitting the post reply button. I explained it all. The difference is there. I explained the whole thing numerous times and posted pics. If you want, you can ask the moda to move those pics and posts here. It seems you are trolling now tagging me again and again and clearly what seems like looking for a fight. I don't have time to waste on this anymore. Believe what you want, but stop trolling.
Last edited:
dr325i
G.O.A.T.
The only difference is in the string channel. The rest is no change in the mold.
same as PT113B and PT346.1 - same mold, slight change in string channel
moon shot
Hall of Fame
Must be a pro stock specifically weighted for that activity, like a fidget spinner.
haqq777
Legend
We need a video of said spinning action!
She was doing it for their media stuff yesterday, whatever it is they are doing with their Head players instead of IW. I play the retail Tour now and I think I would break my finger if I tried to spin it at the throat, but then again, I'm not a pro.We need a video of said spinning action!
GR190
New User
That reminds me, after years of using the RF97 and spinning it at the wide spot near where the throat and handle meet a million times - first time I did that out of habit with the Ultra Tour's thin H19 throat, it almost ripped the end of my index finger off
moon shot
Hall of Fame
That reminds me, after years of using the RF97 and spinning it at the wide spot near where the throat and handle meet a million times - first time I did that out of habit with the Ultra Tour's thin H19 throat, it almost ripped the end of my index finger off
That’s why they need to release the H22 ... to prevent this injury.
Maybe they should number them based on the ring size that can comfortably gunsling it around their finger.
Zoolander
Hall of Fame
What is PT346.1? Current retail racquet?
PT is never retail, at least not offical
. It is the current ND racquet.
Last edited:
PT is never retail, at least not offical
what does that mean in practice? That no retail racket (meaning a racket anyone can buy from a store) would have PT code written on a hairpin?
Right. Retail racquets are TGKs only.
H22 fan
Semi-Pro
What does TGK or TGT stand for?
lidoazndiabloboi
Hall of Fame
Im not sure which rackets your guys are debating, but these 2 are retail version. They have a different shaped beam from the side view.
2nd Serve Ace
Hall of Fame
The speed looks to have a "D" beam throat as well, compared to the boxier gravity throat.
Im not sure which rackets your guys are debating, but these 2 are retail version. They have a different shaped beam from the side view.
Nostradamus
Bionic Poster
maybe he did switch.. There has to be a reason why his 2nd serve suck so bad
2nd Serve Ace
Hall of Fame
The G pro is a good serving frame. AZ served great at AO.
Problem is technique: decelling at impact is when AZ makes all the DFs.
Nostradamus
Bionic Poster
decal is amateur mistake, why would top pro make that mistake ?
Zoolander
Hall of Fame
PT is never retail, at least not offical
Thanks Howard!
Im not sure which rackets your guys are debating, but these 2 are retail version. They have a different shaped beam from the side view.
Yes we know you don’t see the difference again. You don’t even see it between blue and red so we don’t care anymore.
TW had it is 20mm vs 21/20/21 mm...
Why would I? I don't have right equipment to do it. And no real aim. TW does NOT measure 1 racquet but plenty of them...... So the result is pretty accurate.
And even if I measured it and it was 20 mm then it is just one racquet. It is not reliable.
So now to sum up a discussion we have
- different beam width and shape
- different throat shape
- different playability - which is mentioned in many threads here
- different string pattern with old speed grommet on Barty's racquet
versus
'No, she did switch' - by Howard H and d325i.
Last edited:
In maths 21 mm is not equal to 20 mm so how there is no difference?
moon shot
Hall of Fame
I have a digital micrometer, it is quite easy on a shape like a racquet for it to be able to shift and get slightly different readings.
in addition a millimeter is very small, a difference in painting technique or decal location could theoretically shift it one way or another — especially if rounding the fractions off.
