Well, that is the question, you start with and presume he is guilty already, while I say, let's wait for the jury = until he is proven guilty? Serious question... please provide a serious answer.
And then yes, if found guilty, let's do the 'burning at the stake' stuff, but we must not fall for this social media mob 'how dare you' so called justice, that while the case has not been handled and decided already, that we must act and believe he is guilty already .... not only abusers should be punished, but liars and slanderers also, both should know there are consequences if you physically or spiritually abuse other people, no? Serious question ...
I said it many times, the fact that we have freedom of speech and must have it, does not mean we can presume guilty until proved innocent because some 'great writer' says so or 'investigating' it... to use a great fun tennis fight example here ... not the hype emo social media polls or likes determine the goat debate, but the tennis facts out there proved it ... in history = GS titles.
Beware of all the social warrior wars going on and growing in our times, also in tennis. Of course they can be right many times... but guess what, they can be totally wrong also... no? serious question, please provide a serious answer.
Of course the german courts or any other courts can make big mistakes... but, they can also be right, no? Serious question, please provide a serious answer.
Of course, if someone are found guilty, let the law courts and punishment accordingly deal with him, but whether you agree or not, this new 'social media warriors' online 'justice' department of our woke generation... are at least as screwed and questionable as every bad court past and current times.