I would probably prefer the Prestige but in the MP or Pro version. I like the MP version because its lighter and there is more room for customization while the Pro has an open pattern which makes it easier to generate spin and power but its also heavier which doesn't leave as much room for customization.
You need to be able to take a huge cut at the ball to produce results at a high level with the prestige. I could not compete at the 5.5/open level with this stick.
The K90 is more maneuverable and had more power with the same control.
Kblade... you must be kidding me, I could/would never play with this, string pattern is too dense, little to no power, no spin. I did have good results serving and volleying with this however.
My brother's current stick is the K90 so i do have more use with it.
My current stick is the Muscle Weave 200g, coming from the LM prestige mid, prior to the Original 85.
I play at about 5.5 singles and 6.0/open doubles and play in tournements (including futures, which i don't fair well in).
The K90 is more maneuverable and had more power with the same control.
Would you recommend this racquet for doubles? Most of time playing is doubles and I am at the net for at least 80% of the time.
I understand that K90 has more plow through due to the higher weight but how it is possible that the K90 felt more manueverable while the swingweight is much heavier than the MG Prestige Mid?
The results so far are somewhat surprising to me.I expected K90 to be the winner.It is the most versatile racquet out of these 3 in my opinion.
The results so far are somewhat surprising to me.I expected K90 to be the winner.It is the most versatile racquet out of these 3 in my opinion.