he's obviously the favorite, but anything is possible.
Yep, as Johnny Mac says, "hang around, you never know, the other guy might break an ankle!"
Anything can happen in sport.
To those who thought Coria would NOT beat Gaudio to win RG 2004.... you were in the overwhelming minority, but you were right.
Yep quite a difference the way the courts play. I think the tennis balls are heavier to at the French Open which is more spin friendly to players like Nadal.^^^you cant take anything from any Hamburg matches, they have never been an indication of french open results, prolly because of the differene in clay
Simply put, Nadal is the best player on clay and may win this tournament.
Simply put, Nadal is the best player on clay and will win this tournament.
Fixed that for you. You're welcome.
LOL LOL 10 charsYep, as Johnny Mac says, "hang around, you never know, the other guy might break an ankle!"
Anything can happen in sport.
To those who thought Coria would NOT beat Gaudio to win RG 2004.... you were in the overwhelming minority, but you were right.
The proper correction should have been: Nadal may win Wimbledon this year.
Truth is, Nadal won 6-1 6-3 6-0, and then went to beat Federer in Wimbledon final.Nadal will loose the FO this year to Fed in one of the closest most contested 5 set matches of all time.
And
Due to the loss at the FO Nadal will become a head case for the rest of the year barely reaching the 4th round at Wimby and just practically falling apart by hardcourt season. This of course will result in a drastic decline from his #2 ranking all the way down to somewhere around 9-10.
Wait and see........
100-2 not bad no? But I sense Djoker beating Tsitsipas in the final with one of the aforementioned 2 beating Nadal in 5 epic sets.
Djokovic has a slight chance to beat Nadal, Federer has even less. Nadal's only real opponent is a blister. The most likely outcome to this tournament is Nadal winning without dropping a set.
Insane that 14 years later Nadal is still favourite and 4 time defending champion. Just lol.Is there anyone that actually thinks Nadal won't win? Please explain. I want to think he won't win (Go Fed!) but can't find any reason he wouldn't.
Wonder where this guy isNadal will loose the FO this year to Fed in one of the closest most contested 5 set matches of all time.
And
Due to the loss at the FO Nadal will become a head case for the rest of the year barely reaching the 4th round at Wimby and just practically falling apart by hardcourt season. This of course will result in a drastic decline from his #2 ranking all the way down to somewhere around 9-10.
Wait and see........
He won't win unless he'll have a bloody battle with Joker in 5 sets and has blister on his feet going to the final with Fed. Otherwise, it's impossible to beat him. I am Fed's fan by the way.
Simply put, Nadal is the best player on clay and will win this tournament.
Fixed that for you. You're welcome.
The proper correction should have been: Nadal may win Wimbledon this year.
I love these little sureshs gems that pop up.Forget Nadal - I may win Wimby this year
(don't bet anything on that though)
It's 13 years later... It's great number too, no need for exaggeration...Insane that 14 years later Nadal is still favourite and 4 time defending champion. Just lol.
Oh look, another troll overrating Nadal's chances. When will it stop? Djokovic OWNS Nadal mentally. Did you miss Rome, where Nadal couldn't even beat a washed-up Ferrero and Djokovic took the trophy with ease? Djokovic will probably win the calendar slam this year. I mean, who's gonna stop him? Mono Fed? Blisterdal? Luckiest tennis player ever.Djokovic has a slight chance to beat Nadal, Federer has even less. Nadal's only real opponent is a blister. The most likely outcome to this tournament is Nadal winning without dropping a set.