Relax crazy. The point that you can't get in your brain is that both of them are capable of playing at a higher level. However, they are not putting in the time. Both have admitted to this, and both have shown that they still have "the right stuff".
Oh I'm relaxed. The point that you can't get in your brain doesn't get is that Fed and Nadal are in a different place in their career.
Fed is playing about as well as can be expected from a 30 year old in modern tennis. His last few years(and this one)are very remniscent of Pete's last years on tour. Again the fact that you think he's capable of playing now as good as he did when he was 24-25 is hilarious and again shows your basic lack of understanding for the game.
Roger would win AO if not for Novak
We don't know that, maybe Murray would have been less nervous in the final if he was facing Roger. Not to mention that Fed barely escaped the 2nd round this year while in his peak he cruised through the opening rounds with ease.
was the only player able to defeat Novak up to that point at the FO no less
So what? He played one great match, big deal, no one said he isn't capable of it once in a blue moon. It's the consistant level of play week in week out and the ability to recover from tough matches that is the problem when tennis players hit a certain point in their career.
and played his best FO game ever.
LOL, he played well but not as good as he did in 2005,2006 and 2007 FO. The field beside big 4 these days is lacking which enabled Fed to look better than he really is at the moment.
Only a crazy Tsonga could take Roger out at Wim
Right, this year it was crazy Tsonga while last year Fed was on the brink of losing to freakin Falla. Tsonga played good but was made to look better by Fed's passive play and mediocre ROS, there's a reason Fed never lost a 2-0 lead in slams up until now.
and we still have yet to see what Roger does for USO and WTF.
Yes, we'll see, he won't win either.
Again, Roger is not playing a lesser level because of his age
Oh yes, he really is, age and mileage.
This is so stupid it almost doesn't warrant an answer. Yes he chooses to go go down 0-2 sets against grasscourt beast Falla in freakin Wimbledon.
Only poeple beating Federer consistently in Majors are Nadal and Novak and they were doing that years back.
Eh, right. Soderling, Berdych, Tsonga, Del Potro losses never happened.
Oh yes you desperately need one. Anyone claiming Fed can play as good as ever at the age of 30 and is in the same situation as 24-25 year old Nadal needs to get back to planet Earth.
