One of Yonex's best. The 90 square inch version cured my tennis elbow. It weighed in at around 14+ ounces and was a beast.
The RD Tour is my absolute favorite cosmetic of all time. The trinagular beam and the "window" at 12 o'clock showing the braided graphite makes this racquet beautiful.
Great find.
Just bought the racquet, good conditions. Can't wait to play with it. Racquet feels not too much heavy, despite its declared weight. beautiful paint-job, first time for me to own a Yonex. it is a good frame?
Hi Cesare,
it's a very nice racquet. I'd start out with a nice multi, but don't remember the frame to be extremely string sensitive. Something that worked really well in a similar racquet, the RD-7, was a Bab Nat Gut - Lux BB combo. I love old Yonexes, they don't really come more solid than this.
Yours is the larger head version? I used those in early 90s, headlight, generates easy spin, powerful frame but not harsh for elbow
The srd90 is the midsize more popular version supposedly used by the pros
Hmm, that reminds me - I got a 95 recently - must take it out for a spin tomorrow. I agree about the paint job - stunning!
One of Yonex's best. The 90 square inch version cured my tennis elbow. It weighed in at around 14+ ounces and was a beast.
The RD Tour is my absolute favorite cosmetic of all time. The trinagular beam and the "window" at 12 o'clock showing the braided graphite makes this racquet beautiful.
Great find.
The great Dino, how are you doin'? you know, in this period i'm very happy with my old Volkl C10 Comp mid. underrated racquet, and probably the best Volkl mid ever, at least for my game. in this one, i have the x-one biphase 17, and it works so great, but i think i'm going to follow your string suggestions for my new frame.
Cesare, have you had a chance to string the SRD 95 up yet? Which string and tension did you go for? How did it play?
Dino, would you please post a picture, if it's possible, of your Volkl c7 comp mid?taking a look to your Rdc Log, i notice that you own one. I've never seen that frame.Thank you so much.
I will, but it may take a week or so...
Dino, would you please post a picture, if it's possible, of your Volkl c7 comp mid?taking a look to your Rdc Log, i notice that you own one. I've never seen that frame.Thank you so much.
well, I love this racket but just getting back into tennis, I needed something a little lighter and with more power... the Becker London was the closest thing I found to the Super Rd Tour that had a similar feeling in dwell time on the string bed and comfort.
[/QUOTE
the Becker London, very beautiful and probably the best looking frame in the market today..
Curious... Is anyone still playing with these?
Just got mysel a pair of brand new Yonex Super RD tour 95s!!
Have been waiting and searching for some affordable ones for such a long time. And got them for an incredible price!!
I played with them a long time ago, but were left behind at my ex's.
Taking one of them for a spin tomorrow!!
How did it go? How do you string yours? Great racquet, isn't it?
this is the best frame for control of yonex ever made , Hewitt palys many years with the 90 version in many paint jobs, i uused this frame are very good , many TERRICOLAS ( this is named the claycourters in Spain ) selct the RD 7 , but for me the srd tour are better
Reviving this thread because I am now comparing the Super RD Tour 95 to the V-core G330, following a discussion on this other thread
http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/index.php?threads/do-new-rackets-really-help-your-game.562892/
Coincidence makes that I also included an RD 7.. Two 20yo rackets against top of the line 2013 crop (I think). Specs are really close for the Super RD and the G 330. Any other users of the Super RD or RD-7 these days? Or has everyone moved on?
Yeah, I love the RD-7. One of the people I hit with has one, she's about a 3.0 but she doesn't seem to have any trouble with the headsize, surprisingly.I like RD -7 very much. Got three of them in a small variations of pj. I can hit big with this gun.
Yeah, I love the RD-7. One of the people I hit with has one, she's about a 3.0 but she doesn't seem to have any trouble with the headsize, surprisingly.
I played the Super RD Tour 95 many years ago and it's my favorite Yonex by far. I, personally, put it ahead of the RD-7 because the RD-7 always felt a little clunky through the air whereas the SRD Tour 95 felt more nimble. The response of of the stringbed was so solid. It's my number 2 racquet of all time behind the Fischer VT Pro 98.
https://web.archive.org/web/19980115025901/http://www.tennis-warehouse.com/YPics/RDT.htmlCan you compare specs of Super RD Tour 95 and RD-7?
There should not be any problems with headsize, it's 95, she could has some problems with the weight. For sure you don't know her racquet's weight. One from mine three is heavier than other two, i will let you know soon, just looking for scales.
Wow, didn't realize the racquet was that heavy.There should not be any problems with headsize, it's 95, she could has some problems with the weight. For sure you don't know her racquet's weight. One from mine three is heavier than other two, i will let you know soon, just looking for scales.
Wow, didn't realize the racquet was that heavy.
I just figured that at 3.0 she would have some trouble with a midsize head, because of the fact that midsizes are less forgiving (although the RD-7 is an exception, really)
Looks like we have different definitions of midsize then.RD-7 is not a midsize one, it's a midplus racquet,
95 inch head.
Looks like we have different definitions of midsize then.
I've always thought midsize was 95 and under, and midplus was 96-104.
Then that would mean the midsize racquet is virtually extinct, no?Midsize is 90 and under
Then that would mean the midsize racquet is virtually extinct, no?