Tennis - Nadal
NBA - Jordan
Golf - Tiger
Auto Racing - Schumacher
NFL - Jim Brown
What they all have in common is utter domination of their sport and every single rival. No negative H2H!
Tennis - Nadal
NBA - Jordan
Golf - Tiger
Auto Racing - Schumacher
NFL - Jim Brown
What they all have in common is utter domination of their sport and every single rival. No negative H2H!
Tennis - Nadal
NBA - Jordan
Golf - Tiger
Auto Racing - Schumacher
NFL - Jim Brown
What they all have in common is utter domination of their sport and every single rival. No negative H2H!
Spurious comparison here... If you make a tennis-like comparison - taking their careers where they cross over and ignore their first 2 and last 2 years (their non-primes) then Schumacher only outperformed Mika Hakkinen 3 world championships to 2.Auto Racing - Schumacher
What they all have in common is utter domination of their sport and every single rival. No negative H2H!
Tennis - Nadal
NBA - Jordan
Golf - Tiger
Auto Racing - Schumacher
NFL - Jim Brown
What they all have in common is utter domination of their sport and every single rival. No negative H2H!
Tennis - Nadal
What they all have in common is utter domination of their sport and every single rival. No negative H2H!
Tennis - Federer
NBA - Jordan
Golf - Tiger
Auto Racing - Senna
NFL - Jerry Rice
MMA - Emelianenko Fedor
Tennis - Nadal
NBA - Jordan
Golf - Tiger
Auto Racing - Schumacher
NFL - Jim Brown
What they all have in common is utter domination of their sport and every single rival. No negative H2H!
Tennis - Nadal
NBA - Jordan
Golf - Tiger
Auto Racing - Schumacher
NFL - Jim Brown
What they all have in common is utter domination of their sport and every single rival. No negative H2H!
Tennis - Nadal
NBA - Jordan
Golf - Tiger
Auto Racing - Schumacher
NFL - Jim Brown
What they all have in common is utter domination of their sport and every single rival. No negative H2H!
NFL... no way it is Jim Brown. I don't agree that it's Montana anymore. At this point, I'd have to give it to Drew Brees.
LOL seriously, Brees? He's not even close to being the best of his generation (behind Brady, both Mannings, and maybe even Rodgers).
Golf has no such thing as head-to-head. Although, I think it's easy to argue that Woods is the greatest golfer ever. 142 consecutive tourney cuts made. He'll pass Nicklaus for tourney wins soon enough. The guy is only 37 and in top physical condition.
Jordan definitely best ever basketball player.
Auto Racing... I have no clue.
NFL... no way it is Jim Brown. I don't agree that it's Montana anymore. At this point, I'd have to give it to Drew Brees.
Tennis... I've consistently said it is Rod Laver. But I think the presence of a negative H2H is a dumb criteria.
It isn't an American football forum, so I won't get into it. But let's just say that number of championships aren't necessarily the only determining factor for defining the greatest quarterback.
Tennis - Nadal
NBA - Jordan
Golf - Tiger
Auto Racing - Schumacher
NFL - Jim Brown
What they all have in common is utter domination of their sport and every single rival. No negative H2H!
Basketball there is no argument. Golf - Jack Nicklaus as of now, maybe tiger has it. NFL - Joe Montana what are you even thinking! Jim Brown is not even top 5. Tennis - you be trolling, as of now its Federer. Until you beat 17 you cannot be considered the greatest.
It wasn't till Jordan got a better team and Bird and Magic declined that he started winning a lot
Nonsense my dear friend.
Jordan helped his team get better, end of story.
The starting line up of the bulls in 91 was: mj, pippen, cartwright, paxson and grant. I think only grant made it to the all star game in 95 maybe... Not sure. was that a better team? The team was even better before they traded oakley to the knicks...
After doug collins left and phil jackson came, the spirit changed.
And it's the triangle offense that made the bulls the team it was at the time.
Maybe Bird was declining but in 91 the lakers led by magic defeated the favorites blazers with drexler, porter and robinson. And the bulls lost the 1st game of the finals at home, where magic and worthy played superb basketball.
Also, mj had to face the knicks (ewing, mcdaniel, starks, oakley), the pistons, the cavs (price,nance, dougherty).
The eastern conference was hardcore in the nineties.
And after 91, just check the level of the bulls opponents in the finals: blazers, suns (mvp barkley, kj, majerle), sonics (kemp, payton) and the jazz.
And in the east the bulls faced the heat (mourning, hardaway), the pacers (jackson, miller)...
The opposition even after bird and magic's retirement was still very strong.
Maybe the second generation of bulls with rodman, harper and kukoc was stronger. But it is not proven fact.
Tennis - Nadal
NBA - Jordan
Golf - Tiger
Auto Racing - Schumacher
NFL - Jim Brown
What they all have in common is utter domination of their sport and every single rival. No negative H2H!
How the heck is a one trick pony a GOAT contender? Sheesh.
Disagree on the bolded part.
Magic/Bird dynasty are from the 80s and Jordan is from the 90s, a separation between the two. While the Lakers/Celtics played through the early 90s, they were a shadow of themselves at that time, because of ages, milage, and injuries. Bird was hammered with injuries especially the bad back which eventually force him to reitred. The Lakers fare better than the Celtics, but still it's a deteriorating old team. And Divac is no Kareem. Beating the Blazers in 91 doesn't mean the Lakers were at the same level in the 80s. Remember when the Lakers lost to the Bulls 4-1 in the final was when Worthy and Scott was injured after the 1st game. The Bulls were young and more hungry. It doesn't mean the Lakers would have won had they were healthy, but the series would have more competitive.
With that being said, I still believe MJ is better than Magic/Bird.