Fedalforever
Semi-Pro
what it tells us. @Djokovic2011
Edit: mods edit title if possible.
I mixed up Sampras' and Nadal's stats.
Edit: mods edit title if possible.
I mixed up Sampras' and Nadal's stats.
Last edited:
Thats only because he din't reach RG finals loool. I don't take Sampras record serious man. Imagine if Fed din't make any RG finals? Imagine Nadal din't make 5 Wimby finals.Yep, only Sampras has a more impressive conversion ratio in finals when it comes to the most decorated Slam champions.
Sampras can't even make RG finals which screws the conversion numbers.Serbian warrior king N0le's 10-8 is very impressive tbh. Would easily take it above Sampras' 14-4.
Sampras can't even make RG finals which screws the conversion numbers.
16-6 and 12-3 are pretty much the same as 14-4. Anyway nobody knows how would he convert in FO finals if he played them.Thats only because he din't reach RG finals loool. I don't take Sampras record serious man. Imagine if Fed din't make any RG finals? Imagine Nadal din't make 5 Wimby finals.
Let me word it for you so that you may understand, Sampras never made any finals at RG, it is a fact that clay was his worst surface and had he made few finals there he would lose there quite a few times.I agree. Sampras not making RG finals is why he has won 14 non clay GS finals.
Nadal would have an impressive 80% compared to 77% OF PETE.16-6 and 12-3 are pretty much the same as 14-4. Anyway nobody knows how would he convert in FO finals if he played them.
I agree with you brah. Disregarding RG, Sampras is 14-4 and N0le is 10-5. As you rightly point out, Samoras' record is only better because he couldn't reach RG finals.Let me word it for you so that you may understand, Sampras never made any finals at RG, it is a fact that clay was his worst surface and had he made few finals there he would lose there quite a few times.
Very perceptive of you. This is just the begining in achievements that Novak has over Pete, both are tied at 18 finals 14-4 and 10-8. 1 more final and Novak will go ahead.It tells us Djokovic is more capable of reaching finals that are not on his favourite surface.
3% is not a huge difference you know...Nadal would have an impressive 80% compared to 77% OF PETE.
7 non HC finals for N0le vs 11 non clay finals for Nadal.It tells us Djokovic is more capable of reaching finals that are not on his favourite surface.
But it would put him No.1 in the ranking for the best conversion.3% is not a huge difference you know...
But leave him without a career GS and slam wins on only two surfacesBut it would put him No.1 in the ranking for the best conversion.
There are 3 slams outside RG but there are 2 slams outside HC. Not a fair observation dear.7 non HC finals for N0le vs 11 non clay finals for Nadal.
The difference is there are 2 non HC Slams, while there are 3 non clay Slams. More chances to reach non clay finals.7 non HC finals for N0le vs 11 non clay finals for Nadal.
Yes i know I was just showing that Pete record isn't all that impressive considering Nadal would be 12-3 if he din't make Wimby finals.But leave him without a career GS and slam wins on only two surfaces
I could see that coming but Russell brah mentioned surface. Why didn't you disagree with him then? And brah your argument can be flipped around and said overall that should give Serbian warrior king N0le more opportunity to reach GS finals because he has 2 slams on his favorite surface dearThere are 3 slams outside RG but there are 2 slams outside HC. Not a fair observation dear.
True but don't you agree that's offset by the fact that Novak has more chances to reach GS finals overall then as he has an extra slam on his surface....besides, it was RJ who mentioned surface. I was merely responding to him.The difference is there are 2 non HC Slams, while there are 3 non clay Slams. More chances to reach non clay finals.
Dear Fedalforever, Don't worry he already has 7 Hard court slams. Nadal is at a measly 3.I could see that coming but Russell brah mentioned surface. Why didn't you disagree with him then? And brah your argument can be flipped around and said overall that should give Serbian warrior king N0le more opportunity to reach GS finals because he has 2 slams on his favorite surface dear
Pete was the GREATEST big match player in the Slams. He kept his closest rival Agassi to under double-digit in Slam total and turned it on when necessary. Unlike this generation of MUGS, he was a true HERO on court - played on through injuries, illness and thalassemia.
Dear Fedalforever, Don't worry he already has 7 Hard court slams. Nadal is at a measly 3.
+1 sister. Good poast.Sampras is the true moral victor. His more emotional and pseudo-intellectual fans are convinced he'd have won well more than 20 Slams had he not been a giant mug relative to his insane potential levels.
Nadal is only a prince compared to Sampras.
1-2 FO's is cutting Sampras short (IMO).
3 is enough for him, he will outdo the second best clay courter of this generation Djokovic and the 3rd best claycourter Federer too.Sampras is the true moral victor. His more emotional and pseudo-intellectual fans are convinced he'd have won well more than 20 Slams had he not been a giant mug relative to his insane potential levels.
Nadal is only a prince compared to Sampras.
1-2 FO's is cutting Sampras short (IMO).
Yep, and he took those chances. He stands at 11 HC Slam finals, tied with Sampras and only one short of record holders Federer and Lendl.True but don't you agree that's offset by the fact that Novak has more chances to reach GS finals overall then as he has an extra slam on his surface....besides, it was RJ who mentioned surface. I was merely responding to him.
If not for thalassemia a disorder which causes FATIGUE, Pete would have won a FO. He beat clay greats like Courier and Bruguera on the SLOWEST clay ever. If he got to play on today's faster clay he'd have a shot at 1-2 FO's.
Interesting way to spell.+1 sister. Good poast.
Is this your usual off-season mode or does the power of 90s clay compel you to talk like this?Heck, he won Rome as well, which was PRACTICALLY the FO back then - destroyed an ATG like Becker in the final. He would DESTROY this overrated group of chumps, probably beat this CRAPOLA version of Nadal and then choking Nole in the finals.
On clay:3 is enough for him, he will outdo the second best clay courter of this generation Djokovic and the 3rd best claycourter Federer too.
Good fair post. One of the few fair Novak posters here. Despite our disagreements you seem a good poster, sir. Good day.Yep, and he took those chances. He stands at 11 HC Slam finals, tied with Sampras and only one short of record holders Federer and Lendl.
Is this your usual off-season mode or does the power of 90s clay compel you to talk like this?
Heck, he won Rome as well, which was PRACTICALLY the FO back then - destroyed an ATG like Becker in the final. He would DESTROY this overrated group of chumps, probably beat this CRAPOLA version of Nadal and then choking Nole in the finals.
Okay hopefully when Nole wins RG you will change your standings?On clay:
Djokovic < Gaudio < fedr (< hypothetical Sampras)
Sampras is the true moral victor. His more emotional and pseudo-intellectual fans are convinced he'd have won well more than 20 Slams had he not been a giant mug relative to his insane potential levels.
Nadal is only a prince compared to Sampras.
1-2 FO's is cutting Sampras short (IMO).
If everyone would put their bias towards one player aside, we would all have amazing conversations all the time.Good fair post. One of the few fair Novak posters here. Despite our disagreements you seem a good poster, sir. Good day.
Who wants to have serious convos on the net? Our lives are serious enough. Trolling FTWIf everyone would put their bias towards one player aside, we would all have amazing conversations all the time.
Okay hopefully when Nole wins RG you will change your standings?
Nadal might be the best player of the Open Era, he would be already UNDISPITED if not for Djokovic. Federer is LUCKY that he only MUGDICK during his peak years.