2012 Olympics Mens QF: [1] Federer (SUI) vs [10] Isner (USA)

What's the result going to be?

  • Federer wins 2-0

    Votes: 36 49.3%
  • Federer wins 2-1

    Votes: 21 28.8%
  • Isner wins 2-0

    Votes: 7 9.6%
  • Isner wins 2-1

    Votes: 9 12.3%

  • Total voters
    73
  • Poll closed .
The way Federer has been playing in those several games makes me believe, that his tactic is to engage Isner in as many exchanges as possible on his serve, in an effort to tire him out.

It is a risky strategy, but I think a clever one.
 

zam88

Professional
The way Federer has been playing in those several games makes me believe, that his tactic is to engage Isner in as many exchanges as possible on his serve, in an effort to tire him out.

It is a risky strategy, but I think a clever one.


in a 3 set match vs. a guy who's gone 70-68 in a 5th set? in a 5 set match i could see it.


but why would you do this if you felt you were mos def the superior player?

this sounds like a tactic an underdog would use
 

Tony48

Legend
God Isner sucks. A rally over 5 shots = him inexplicably making some random error

he really is just a serve bot.
 
in a 3 set match vs. a guy who's gone 70-68 in a 5th set? in a 5 set match i could see it.


but why would you do this if you felt you were mos def the superior player?

this sounds like a tactic an underdog would use

It is a tactic, that a man, who is not divorced from reality would use. The way Isner is serving there are few chances for even an opening. A player should create complex circumstances, to keep his opponent under pressure.

Federer is literally walking Isner all over the court.
 

MAX PLY

Hall of Fame
in a 3 set match vs. a guy who's gone 70-68 in a 5th set? in a 5 set match i could see it.


but why would you do this if you felt you were mos def the superior player?

this sounds like a tactic an underdog would use

Not really, the more exchanges the better the rhythm and timing Roger gets. In addition, Isner will make errors if he goes for the first strike too soon. There were few rallies in the marathon with Mahut.
 

underground

G.O.A.T.
Just what you expected from Isner, this is why I prefer Fed playing him rather than Raonic, because Raonic can put sitters better than him. When Fed plays Raonic, there's less rallies than against Isner which makes him settling down later.
 

underground

G.O.A.T.
Federer's stubborness of doing continuous dropshots on sitters made him save a break point, but prevails 6-4 1st set.
 

jk175d

Semi-Pro
The way Federer has been playing in those several games makes me believe, that his tactic is to engage Isner in as many exchanges as possible on his serve, in an effort to tire him out.

It is a risky strategy, but I think a clever one.

Not to tire him out, but to get the break. If this match is decided by rallies Isner has no chance.
 

Sentinel

Bionic Poster
Come on Roger

FFqjs.gif
 

kanamit

Hall of Fame
These announcers are pretty frikkin terrible. Gee, I wonder why people don't serve and volley as much anymore.
 
Not to tire him out, but to get the break. If this match is decided by rallies Isner has no chance.

I meant on Federer's serve! It is clear, that Federer HAS to involve himself into ralliess on Isner's serve. But, for that to happen, he needs to tire the big man, so that he is not serving so strong and precise.

It is a risky strategy, because, if John shows a little bit of capabilities (as he has shown in the last game of the first set) it can get dangerous for Federer. For now Federer's tactic is working. Let us see, if it will continue like that.
 

フェデラー

Hall of Fame
Roger is serving very well. If he wins today he is guaranteed to keep his no.1 ranking. Isner is a very good opponent for him to face. He shouldn't have much trouble with Nishikori or Del Potro.
 

sdont

Legend
Roger is serving very well. If he wins today he is guaranteed to keep his no.1 ranking. Isner is a very good opponent for him to face. He shouldn't have much trouble with Nishikori or Del Potro.

No. If he doesn't win this match, he'll lose it. Not the other way around.
 

jk175d

Semi-Pro
I meant on Federer's serve! It is clear, that Federer HAS to involve himself into ralliess on Isner's serve. But, for that to happen, he needs to tire the big man, so that he is not serving so strong and precise.

It is a risky strategy, because, if John shows a little bit of capabilities (as he has shown in the last game of the first set) it can get dangerous for Federer. For now Federer's tactic is working. Let us see, if it will continue like that.

I still disagree. There's no way he's thinking about tiring out Isner in a best of 3 match. There's much more standing around and walking from side to side to receive (or serve) than there is actual playing tennis with Isner. Can't expect there's any way to make Isner rally enough to get tired.
 
Top