Nadal15thslam
Hall of Fame
This tournament just doesn't suit him. He'll probably never win it and that's okay. He has a lot of other wins to be happy about.Still waiting for you to quote me after Nadal will beat Fritz. Oh, wait...
This tournament just doesn't suit him. He'll probably never win it and that's okay. He has a lot of other wins to be happy about.Still waiting for you to quote me after Nadal will beat Fritz. Oh, wait...
Still waiting for you to quote me after Nadal will beat Fritz. Oh, wait...
And this guy was saying the opposite.I said Fritz would win.
And this guy was saying the opposite.
To be fair the 1st set was decent for Rafa in the Fritz match but he was a lot worse after that.And this guy was saying the opposite.
So Vamos Fritz it is for tonight.No. Mathematically still possible but very unlikely.
See post #209 in this thread.
You want Djokovic to vulture another win over a terrible Nadal? Let it go. I'm upset this year over the IW and USO losses. As for WTF, I never expected anything here.So Vamos Fritz it is for tonight.
yes hes outIs Rafa 100% out of the tournament now?
I'm upset for Wimbledon the most. He was actually playing well there.You want Djokovic to vulture another win over a terrible Nadal? Let it go. I'm upset this year over the IW and USO losses. As for WTF, I never expected anything here.
You want Djokovic to vulture another win over a terrible Nadal? Let it go. I'm upset this year over the IW and USO losses. As for WTF, I never expected anything here.
They played so many times when Nadal was out of form. 7 times just in 2015-2016. For comparison, just one match in 2017 when it was the other way around. Also, DO is not a clay tournament anymore. It's an indoor tournament.Djoko and Nadal have met like 3 times on HC the last 6-7 years, while playing 8 times on clay. Nadal is the real vulture here.
Nadal didn't win a single set in WTF 2009. So what, AO 2009 was asterisked as well? Stop writing BS.It is so much clear how much the AO 2022 win is asterisked.
Nadal was the better player, except for the big points which he lost because Felix served big, while Nadal hit double-faults.
Very strange match, and one of the longest matches you'll ever see for that scoreline.
Even stranger because Felix had all those service winners, so you'd think the match would be shorter than 1hr 57min.
What a paradox.
I'm upset for Wimbledon the most. He was actually playing well there.
They played so many times when Nadal was out of form. 7 times just in 2015-2016. For comparison, just one match in 2017 when it was the other way around. Also, DO is not a clay tournament anymore. It's an indoor tournament.
Comparing 2007-2009 Djokovic (2008-2009 on clay) to 2015-2016 Nadal is absolutely ridiculous, and you know it. That was discussed many times. Just because you ignore Nadal being at his worst in 2015-2016, doesn't mean it isn't true. All other tennis fans know it.Nadal was not even injured in 2015 and played the whole year, same with first part of 2016. Djokovic took him to town on clay even.
If you wanna talk about ''they played so many times'' lets not forget the mid 00s and how many times they played on clay, especially at RG but also masters. I love how you always ignore that period.
Is Rafa 100% out of the tournament now?
Yes, it's still possible for Nadal qualify at 1-2, even if both of his losses are in straights. Scenario:
RR1: Fritz 2-0 Nadal, Ruud 2-0 FAA
RR2: FAA 2-0 Nadal, Fritz 2-0 Ruud
RR3: Nadal 2-0 Ruud, Fritz 2-0 FAA
In this case you would have Fritz at 3-0, 6-0 in sets, and everyone else at 1-2 and 2-4 in sets. Then it would come down to games won
Comparing 2007-2009 Djokovic (2008-2009 on clay) to 2015-2016 Nadal is absolutely ridiculous, and you know it. That was discussed many times. Just because you ignore Nadal being at his worst in 2015-2016, doesn't mean it isn't true. All other tennis fans know it.
At the 2019 AO Nadal went 5 matches in a row without getting broken thanks to his new and improved serve. Only a couple of slips in his first round match brought his service won percentage down to 98%Has Nadal ever gone two matches without getting broken? Don’t think so…
At the 2019 AO Nadal went 5 matches in a row without getting broken thanks to his new and improved serve. Only a couple of slips in his first round match brought his service won percentage down to 98%
This gave some Nadal fans confidence to proclaim he would easily handle Djokovic in the final
Ah yes. He went 4 matches in a row without being broken at the 2010 USO and 2006 Wimbledon, and 5 in a row at the 2013 USOOh no sorry I derped lol. Meant to ask “without breaking serve” — and I don’t think he has until now.
Yeah, he had similar serving success in the ‘10 and ‘13 USO, no? I think ‘06 Wimby as well.
Ah yes. He went 4 matches in a row without being broken at the 2010 USO and 2006 Wimbledon, and 5 in a row at the 2013 USO
He only failed to break serve two matches in a row twice before in his career, both times in separate tournaments held one week apart:
2004 Palermo (clay) R16, loss to Mutis, 3-6, 3-6 (0/7 on BP)
2004 Lyon (carpet) R32, loss to Benneteau, 3-6, 0-6 (0/0 on BP)
2007 Chennai (hard) SF, loss to Malisse, 4-6, 6-7 (0/7 on BP)
2007 Sydney (hard) R32, loss to Guccione, 5-6, retired (0/0 on BP)
(with recorded stats, some tournaments missing stats on tennisabstract)
Nadal didn't win a single set in WTF 2009. So what, AO 2009 was asterisked as well? Stop writing BS.
He beat the player who destroyed Djokovic in USO 2021 in straight sets. Had Djokovic beaten Shapovalov, Berrettini and Medvedev you would be calling it a great title.He beat RF at AO. Here he took advantage of Djokovic's sabbatical and vultured it.
at least it wouldnt be a bit asterisked as its with ndal case, coz ndal is not a big threat for djoko who was removed due to some non tennis reasons, which cant be said ditto if we reverse the situation hence djoko is a big threat for ndal there on the kangaroo' continent, lets remove based on the same reason ndal from rg and lets see wut the tune ndal fans will be singing thenHe beat the player who destroyed Djokovic in USO 2021 in straight sets. Had Djokovic beaten Shapovalov, Berrettini and Medvedev you would be calling it a great title.
He beat the player who destroyed Djokovic in USO 2021 in straight sets. Had Djokovic beaten Shapovalov, Berrettini and Medvedev you would be calling it a great title.
Of course, the conditions and the format of both tournaments are similar.It is so much clear how much the AO 2022 win is asterisked.
You forgot his daddy was not allowed to play.Of course, the conditions and the format of both tournaments are similar.
The same thing always happens to him, on a hard indoor court.Opportunistic Felix. Rafa had 4 break chances in the 1st set and could not convert, Felix had one and converted, in a game where Rafa was leading 40-0.
They played so many times when Nadal was out of form. 7 times just in 2015-2016. For comparison, just one match in 2017 when it was the other way around. Also, DO is not a clay tournament anymore. It's an indoor tournament.
His dad is in Mallorca, celebrating the birth of his grandson.You forgot his daddy was not allowed to play.
You want Djokovic to vulture another win over a terrible Nadal? Let it go. I'm upset this year over the IW and USO losses. As for WTF, I never expected anything here.
They also had 3 hardcourt (2 indoor) matches in the second half of 2009, when Nadal was losing to the whole top-10, and should have lost to Almagro and Robredo.Nadal/Djokovic played twice in 2017 and first half of 2018 on clay.
thrice on clay in 06/07.
that's 5 times.
close to evening out compared to 15/16 Nadal vs Djoko (7 times)
They also had 3 hardcourt (2 indoor) matches in the second half of 2009, when Nadal was losing to the whole top-10, and should have lost to Almagro and Robredo.
Djokovic had pretty strong results in 2007, including reaching RG semifinal. Don't see how he was worse than Nadal in the second half of 2009. Only by some miracle Nadal didn't lose in the first round of Paris, and then he lost all 6 sets in WTF. Didn't win a title for 11 months.not going to discount that. only discounting when very young/in one of the worst years or halves for either of them.
nadal was consistently making semis of HC tournaments then.
2009 top 10 was the strongest top 10 there's been in the century anyways.
not discounting djoko YEC 07 loss to Nadal either for example.. Djoko had 5 losses in a row (Nalby Madrid, Santoro Paris and 3 at the YEC)
Djokovic had strong results in 2007, including reaching RG semifinal. He surely was not worse than Nadal in the second half of 2009. Only by some miracle Nadal didn't lose in the first round of Paris, and then he lost all 6 sets in WTF.
There were more than enough discussions on this topic anyway, and many users agree Djokovic faced an out of form Nadal way more times than it was the other way around.
TDjokovic also never reached Nadal in RG after 2016, until it was turned into DO.
But somehow you see a reason to exclude specifically the clay matches in 2007.didn't say he was worse. Point is I dont't see reason to exclude either 2007 YEC djoko or 2009 2nd half Nadal.
except its not even remotely close to true. I've shown evidence above.
oh yeah, like we needed another gazillion meetings at RG.
But somehow you see a reason to exclude specifically the clay matches in 2007.