Article: Andy Murray l Not A Star Federer, Nadal, Djokovic despite two slam titles.

Andy Murray shows titles don’t gurantee sponsors

Marketing experts warn Scot has a ‘tough hill to climb’ to match the Big Three’s fan appeal


Published: 06:00 August 24, 2013

Gulf News



New York: The hottest player in tennis can match forehands with the men he’s joined atop the ATP World Tour rankings, if not international marketing dollars.

Andy Murray is the second man in the past 100 years to simultaneously hold tennis’ three most-esteemed titles - an Olympic gold medal, US Open and Wimbledon championships. The 26-year-old Scot’s recent success hasn’t improved his consumer appeal in America, according to marketing experts, and global endorsement contracts are yet to follow his on-court wins.

As Murray prepares to defend his US Open title in New York starting August 26, he lacks the allure of Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal and Novak Djokovic, who have won at least six Grand Slam titles apiece and routinely draw 22,000 fans for night sessions at Arthur Ashe Stadium in Flushing Meadows, marketers and tennis analysts say. Murray, seeded No. 3, has the third-best odds to win the season’s final Grand Slam behind Djokovic of Serbia and Nadal of Spain, according to bookmakers.

“Andy Murray had to fight really hard to catch up with the Big Three on the court, and now he has to fight to match up with them in the eyes of fans,” Darin David, a senior director in the Dallas-based sports marketing group of The Marketing Arm, said in a telephone interview. “He’s now a multiple Grand Slam winner, so maybe he’ll start making inroads, but it’s a tough hill to climb.”

He follows in the footsteps of Australians Rod Laver, John Newcombe, Roy Emerson and Ken Rosewall, other players from a British Commonwealth nation, who won a total of 38 Grand Slam singles titles in the 1950s, ‘60s and ‘70s. The mustachioed Newcombe became a US commercial face for Canon cameras.

The last British tennis player to make a commercial splash in the US was Virginia Wade, who won the Wimbledon women’s title at the height of the tennis boom in 1977. She appeared in an ad campaign for the American Express Co. charge card that asked, “Do you know me?”

At the US Open, Murray’s ability to draw crowds might be challenged even more because of injuries and poor play among other top players who are crowd favourites. Federer, a five-time champion from Switzerland and winner of a men’s record 17 Grand Slam singles titles, has slipped to No. 7 in the rankings, and Maria Sharapova, a former champion from Russia and holder of the career Grand Slam, withdrew two days ago with a shoulder injury.

Wimbledon Winner

Murray’s endorsement portfolio is almost unchanged since he won Wimbledon last month, becoming the first British man since Fred Perry in 1936 to win the London tournament. His contracts with Adidas AG, Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC, racket supplier Head NV and watch manufacturer Rado Uhren AG earn him roughly $12 million (Dh44 million) annually, according to Nigel Currie, a sports marketing executive at BrandRapport in London.

Murray signed an endorsement deal with Fuse Science Inc. on Thursday, a Florida-based energy products company that sponsors top-ranked golfer Tiger Woods. Financial details weren’t released. Currie said he expects Murray will add to that, and could increase earnings to $24 million by 2014.

Pam Shriver, a former Grand Slam doubles champion and now an ESPN tennis analyst, said she considers Wimbledon, the US Open and the Olympics to be tennis’ three most revered titles. She compared Murray’s stardom in the UK to royalty and said his laid-back personality is a contrast to those of the other elite players, including Djokovic, the world’s No. 1-ranked player whose sense of humour is as well-known in tennis as his powerful forehand.

“In Scotland, I think he’s probably the greatest athlete times four,” Shriver, an American, said of Murray. “I don’t think he’s looking to be the way Djokovic is with the personality, dancing with the crowd or the impersonations. That will never be Andy Murray.”

Q Score

The awareness of Murray among US consumers following his Wimbledon win grew to 20 per cent from 17 per cent earlier this year, according to Henry Schafer, executive vice president of Q Scores, which measure consumer appeal.

That trails Federer (38 per cent) and Nadal (26 per cent), as well as US champions Serena Williams (67 per cent) and Andre Agassi, who is known by 53 per cent of US consumers seven years after retiring from tennis, Schafer said.

Murray said this week that business endeavours are secondary to training and that he expects to finish new deals between the end of the US Open and the start of the Australian Open in January.

“When I have time to do the off-court stuff, I’m more than happy to, but I’ve just spent a lot of time training and in the gym,” Murray said in an interview in New York this week.

He was promoting the BNP Paribas Showdown, a tennis exhibition set for Madison Square Garden in March where he’ll play against Djokovic. Financial details weren’t disclosed but Nadal, the world’s No. 2-ranked player, was paid $1.5 million to play in this year’s edition, according to a person with direct knowledge of the contract.

Murray was the first client of XIX Globosport, a joint venture between Simon Fuller’s XIX Entertainment agency and Globosport, founded by 12-time Grand Slam doubles champion Mahesh Bhupathi. The partnership, formed in April, was created to explore opportunities in developing markets around the world, specifically India and the Middle East.

Bhupathi, from India, said in an e-mail that they were in the process of closing “a few deals” that will be announced later in the year. While he declined to comment further, he told India’s Open Magazine this month that he is focusing on long- term deals that will extend beyond Murray’s retirement. He said Murray is “the one with the muscle.”

“If people want to be associated with him, they have to be open to creating deals that will show his value way past his playing career,” Bhupathi said, according to the magazine.

Long-term loyalty is important to Murray. He said RBS, Head and Adidas have all supported him for at least a decade, before he broke into the top 200.

“There’s no need to rush into doing things,” he said. “You want to work with companies that you have a feeling towards.”

Djokovic and Nadal are co-favourites at 2-1 to win the US Open, according to online sportsbook Bovada.lv. Murray is third at 7-2.

Cliff Drysdale, a former player and now an ESPN tennis announcer, said that while he expects Murray to add sponsorships, the Scot lacks the public personality of Federer, a 32-year-old from Switzerland with what Forbes magazine says is a tennis-high $65 million in endorsements.

“He’s not as outgoing,” Drysdale, a South African, said on a media conference call. “It doesn’t look like he enjoys the game as much as others, so that’s a slight negative.”

David, of the Marketing Arm, said Murray has started to shed that stiff image. He cried on the court after losing to Federer in the 2012 Wimbledon final, then won an emotional gold medal on the same grounds at the Olympics one month later. Before this year’s Wimbledon, Murray appeared in a documentary in which he discussed the March 1996 shooting at his primary school in Dunblane, Scotland, that left 16 students and a teacher dead. He generally avoided previous public talk about the massacre.

Murray turned professional in 2005, broke into the ATP’s top five in 2008 and has remained since, spending 16 weeks this year as the world’s No. 2 player behind Djokovic. He’s won two of the past four Grand Slams and earned $5 million in prize money this year, trailing only Djokovic and Nadal.

Currie said if Murray continues his current trajectory, the endorsement opportunities will grow. He said the dominant player in a global sport such as tennis can expect to make about $75 million annually in endorsement deals.

“Companies were waiting to see if he could crack it, and he has now,” Currie said. “He’s in a good position to build on that further, and if he gets to the point where he’s won four or five Grand Slams, then you start talking about an all-time great and one of the sport’s top earners.”

http://gulfnews.com/sport/tennis/andy-murray-shows-titles-don-t-gurantee-sponsors-1.1223246
 

firepanda

Professional
Yeah, in New Zealand it's still the big three as well. Murray is only known by tennis fans and people with family in England or something. Ferrer is actually better known here, since he comes down every year to play in Auckland before the AO. However, when I went to England, he is the best known player there, for obvious reasons. You see his face around more than any of the other three.
 

batz

G.O.A.T.
If you like amelie, I can post a link from another marketeer saying that Murray can make 100 million if he wants to.

But I wish you well in your quest to find innovative ways to bash Murray.
 
The article is just pointing out Murray is only famous in the UK and that's it. Most casual tennis fans still don't know who he is. Cliff Drysdale is correct, Murray seems depressed, unhappy he has negative body language. Murray comes across as an upper class British snob he just doesn't seem like he is friendly and nice.

Federer, Nadal, Djokovic, have the charisma, that superstar quality that's why they make more money off the court than Andy Murray. These three are also very handsome men.

The article didn't say it but Murray's ugliness is one of the reasons he's not getting more endorsements. It has got to be tough for an ugly British guy with bad teeth to get endorsements. Murray doesn't have that sex appeal to appeal to gay men or straight women.
 
L

Laurie

Guest
Money, money, money - that's all some people care about.

Andy, don't worry, just keep winning the titles: that's much more important.
 
article-2401554-1B71ADB9000005DC-440_634x500.jpg




article-2401554-1B71B811000005DC-867_634x433.jpg
 

FrontHeadlock

Hall of Fame
Nobody commented on the biggest issue in the article: the RIDICULOUS australian open and french open bashing. While the OSG is probably going to be viewed as the 5th most prestigious title, nobody would take it over an AO or FO title.
 

Danny_G13

Rookie
The article is just pointing out Murray is only famous in the UK and that's it. Most casual tennis fans still don't know who he is. Cliff Drysdale is correct, Murray seems depressed, unhappy he has negative body language. Murray comes across as an upper class British snob he just doesn't seem like he is friendly and nice.

Federer, Nadal, Djokovic, have the charisma, that superstar quality that's why they make more money off the court than Andy Murray. These three are also very handsome men.

The article didn't say it but Murray's ugliness is one of the reasons he's not getting more endorsements. It has got to be tough for an ugly British guy with bad teeth to get endorsements. Murray doesn't have that sex appeal to appeal to gay men or straight women.

Are you kidding me? The day Federer, Nadal and Djokovic are called handsome is the day the word is redefined.

I'm not saying Murray is either but clearly Kim Sears, who is fantastically more attractive than Mirka, thinks otherwise.

It has nothing to do with looks, because if I was to tear apart the other 3's looks for what they are, I'd end up insulting them.

What a very odd argument.
 

Incognito

Legend
Andy will get there in terms of popularity. Thank You Andy Murray for your sublime tennis and for letting your racket do all the talking. You are cool as you are!!
 

Incognito

Legend
The article is just pointing out Murray is only famous in the UK and that's it. Most casual tennis fans still don't know who he is. Cliff Drysdale is correct, Murray seems depressed, unhappy he has negative body language. Murray comes across as an upper class British snob he just doesn't seem like he is friendly and nice.

Federer, Nadal, Djokovic, have the charisma, that superstar quality that's why they make more money off the court than Andy Murray. These three are also very handsome men.

The article didn't say it but Murray's ugliness is one of the reasons he's not getting more endorsements. It has got to be tough for an ugly British guy with bad teeth to get endorsements. Murray doesn't have that sex appeal to appeal to gay men or straight women.

That's your opinion. I'm a girl and I'll rather sleep with Andy Murray than Djokovic or Federer YUCK! Andy doesn't care about his looks, unlike the metrosexuals Federer and Djokovic. No amount of good clothes can cover up the ugly noses and chins. They'll give Jay Leno a run for his money.
 

mimi77

New User
Was Federer star with 2 GS ,of course Not ,he wasn't even with 4 , he became star later ,it has nothing with looks ,charisma but mainly with achievments
 

Mainad

Bionic Poster
The article is just pointing out Murray is only famous in the UK and that's it. Most casual tennis fans still don't know who he is. Cliff Drysdale is correct, Murray seems depressed, unhappy he has negative body language. Murray comes across as an upper class British snob he just doesn't seem like he is friendly and nice.

Federer, Nadal, Djokovic, have the charisma, that superstar quality that's why they make more money off the court than Andy Murray. These three are also very handsome men.

The article didn't say it but Murray's ugliness is one of the reasons he's not getting more endorsements. It has got to be tough for an ugly British guy with bad teeth to get endorsements. Murray doesn't have that sex appeal to appeal to gay men or straight women.

'Upper-class British snob', 'ugly', 'bad teeth', 'unfriendly', 'not nice'??? Lol...you're like a worn-out old gramophone record, aren't you? Once again, you have merely shown yourself up and embarrassed yourself in front of the rest of the posters on TTW. You know nothing whatsoever about Andy Murray and clearly don't want to know anything whatsoever about him. Which is your perfect right, of course. But the only advisable thing for you to do in that case is to keep your mouth shut and stop creating threads about somebody you're clearly not interested in.

I bet you couldn't wait to post that article as soon as you found it so you coukl try to use it to justify your absurd prejudices against him. And so it proved! But if you ever bothered to stop and check out a few basic facts about Murray you would know that he is:

1). Born to a working-class family who were far less wealthy than the families of Federer, Nadal and Djokovic. He is about as far from being 'upper-class' as it is possible to be. In fact there was, until recently, a little snobbery towards him from some of the fusty, old Wimbledon types that he wasn't from as 'nice' a background as the far more middle to upper class, Tim Henman. Winning Olympic gold and the Wimbledon title on Centre Court at SW19 has, of course, done much to eliminate that kind of prejudice.

2). He is completely friendly and natural off the court. I can't think of anyone who has ever said anything different. Check out some of the posters on here who have been to practice matches at the USO and remarked how 'cool' and friendly to the fans he is. That is, of course, if you can ever be bothered to do so.

3). Your main prejudices against him seem to be of 3 kinds:

* He is white and he is British ( your posts consistently indicate a hatred towards any white, male, straight players of British or American backgrounds).

* He is not gay.

* You don't happen to fancy him, unlike Federer, Nadal, Djokovic and Agnieszka Radwanska.

So stop embarrassing yourself with all these ignorant, inaccurate and tedious rants against one player who doesn't seem to fit the bill of what you deem to be the ideal tennis player and who seems to tick all the boxes of your ignorance and prejudice. Stop trying to write about him or comment about him until you have some accurate observations to make. And, in the unlikely prospect of that ever happening, just stop writing about him full stop/ period!
 
Last edited:

oneness

Professional
Love how Andy goes about his business. I am pretty sure he is living his life the way he wants to. He clearly doesn't care much for stardom , he would rather spend more time with his dogs than be in the spotlight.
We need all kinds of people in tennis. Among the top stars he sure is one of a kind.
 

THUNDERVOLLEY

G.O.A.T.
Once again, your agenda is clear:

The article didn't say it but Murray's ugliness is one of the reasons he's not getting more endorsements. It has got to be tough for an ugly British guy with bad teeth to get endorsements. Murray doesn't have that sex appeal to appeal to gay men or straight women.

Sorry to break up your little propaganda session, but here in reality, the heart of marketing professional athletes has nothing to do with appealing to gay men, as they are not the key (barely minor) demographic considered. Male fans (for the pro's abilities/character) and female fans (if the pro can be sold as hondsome/sexy/dangerous) are the key demos in sports...not gay men.
 
Top