5555
Hall of Fame
Bookmakers odds are reflected by the money placed on the player. Not entirely on the probability of a player winning.
Whose odds are more accurate than bookies' odds?
Bookmakers had Nadal as the favourite for the Rome final! And so did Rusedski!
And how did their prediction turn out?!
I wonder why 5555 didn't post these kind of threads then.
I'll quote what booson told you:
"Odds are probabilities. High probabilities do not guarantee that something will happen. I don't know what's your point."
Every time Nole is installed the favourite at RG, he fails to deliver. Let's hope history repeats itself. Rafa for a 9th RG title. No one else deserves it and besides BO5, he will be hard to beat.
This is the first time that Nole has been installed as the bookies' favorite for the French Open. It's never happened before.
Don't trust the bookmakers because they said Nole was the favorite at the AO.
I'll quote what Gonzo_style told you:
"Ok, who was the favorite at the AO '14?"
Last edited: