Doubles - Federer, Nadal, Djokovic, Blake in draw.

zzzbrianxxx

Rookie
Article from atptennis.com

"The top eight seeded teams receive a bye into the second round. An outstanding field is led by World No. 1 and defending champions Bob and Mike Bryan, who have won an ATP-best seven titles in 10 finals. They are playing in the Washington final on Sunday. The Bryans, who also won the title in Toronto in 2002, have won titles this years at the Australian Open, Las Vegas, Miami, Houston, Monte-Carlo, Hamburg and Los Angeles. They also have helped the U.S. to the Davis Cup semifinals.

Other seeds in the draw are: No. 2 and 2004 finalists Jonas Bjorkman and Max Mirnyi, No. 3 Mark Knowles and Daniel Nestor, who reached the final in 1996 and 2002 (although they each won the title with different partners). No. 4 are Martin Damm and Leander Paes, No. 5 and last year's finalists Paul Hanley and Kevin Ullyett, No. 6 and 2005 finalists Jonathan Erlich and Andy Ram, No. 7 Simon Aspelin and Julian Knowle, and No. 8 Mahesh Bhupathi and Pavel Vizner.

There are seven Top 10 singles players also in the draw - No. 1 Roger Federer (w/Allegro), No. 2 Rafael Nadal (w/Hewitt), No. 3 Novak Djokovic (w/Zimonjic), No. 6 Fernando Gonzalez (w/Ljubicic), No. 8 Richard Gasquet (w/Clement), No. 9 James Blake (w/J. Murray), and No. 10 Tomas Berdych (w/Kiefer)."




Those are some very good singles players playing together in the doubles draw. It'll be interesting to see how that much singles talent on one side of the court translates to the doubles game. Nadal and Hewitt have games that decidedly do not suit doubles, how will they do? How will Djokovic compare to doubles specialist Zimonjic?
 

Topaz

Legend
Wow!!! Nadal and Hewitt? That's gonna be interesting! And J. Murray and Blake...I like Blake and all, but is this truly better than him and Butorac? I don't think so.

I've been wondering about Knowles/Nestor, since we heard so many break-up rumors during the French, but then they won! And now...is Zimonjic without a partner, as he was supposed to team with Nestor?

Verrrry interesting.
 

Fedace

Banned
i have been ripped off. they are showing nadal hewitt on Masteres.tv which i paid for but the camara is located 2 miles offf the stadium and cannot see a thing. nadal looks like a ant. this sucks.
 

olympus

Rookie
Hewitt/Nadal won 6/4 6/4, Fed/Allegro won as well. I hope TTC shows the highlights of this 2 matches. When would this 2 teams face each other?, My PC has problems reading PDF files...
 

Fedace

Banned
Hewitt/Nadal won 6/4 6/4, Fed/Allegro won as well. I hope TTC shows the highlights of this 2 matches. When would this 2 teams face each other?, My PC has problems reading PDF files...

If they meet it would be in the finals. Fed has to play BRyan bros next, good luck getting past them.;)
 
What about Nadal/Hewitt, who do they play next?

Erlich and Ram, who are ranked 8th in the doubles race. Hewitt and Nadal aren't expected to win, of course. They can just go out there and have fun, getting some practice in, as that's what this is mainly about.
 

Deuce

Banned
It's fun to see supposed tennis fans who think that two top singles players will automatically make for an "awesome" doubles team.
Most people seem to have no idea that doubles is an entirely different game than singles.

By the way - Hewitt and Nadal quit the doubles after their first match. This is no surprise - these guys don't give a damn about doubles, and I'm sure they knew they'd quit after one round if one of them was still in the singles draw. Why enter in the first place, then?

Sure, it was nice that some fans got to see Hewitt and Nadal play doubles together. But to quit after one round (which was very likely pre-planned) shows a decided lack of integrity and a lack of respect for the game itself.
 
Sure, it was nice that some fans got to see Hewitt and Nadal play doubles together. But to quit after one round (which was very likely pre-planned) shows a decided lack of integrity and a lack of respect for the game itself.

I agree completely.
 
Hewitt and Nadal pulling out of doubles was not pre-planned. They had every intention of playing on. After the matches they had just finished, it was the smartest thing for them to do, IMO. And actually, if what was reported was true, neither one of them wanted to pull out, even then. It was heavily suggested to them by the trainers (the trainers who were putting ice packs on both Lleyton and Rafa) that they pull out.

No big deal. The sad truth is 95% of people (and that's being generous) wouldn't give a damn about doubles if it weren't for the singles players moonlighting. I know I wouldn't.

And they would have lost anyway.
 

Deuce

Banned
Hewitt and Nadal pulling out of doubles was not pre-planned.
I'll bet you that it was pre-planned that if they were still alive in the singles draw, they'd pull out of the doubles.
This is done all the time. It's an abuse, and they do it because they can get away with it, unfortunately.

They had every intention of playing on. After the matches they had just finished, it was the smartest thing for them to do, IMO. And actually, if what was reported was true, neither one of them wanted to pull out, even then. It was heavily suggested to them by the trainers (the trainers who were putting ice packs on both Lleyton and Rafa) that they pull out.
Yeah - and if you believe media reports... well... good luck in life.

No big deal. The sad truth is 95% of people (and that's being generous) wouldn't give a damn about doubles if it weren't for the singles players moonlighting. I know I wouldn't.
That's because people like you don't appreciate tennis - you just appreciate fame and 'stars'.
Too bad - you're missing some good stuff.
 
Deuce, are you always so condescending? Or is it limited to the anonymity of the internet? I sincerely hope it is, because if not..."well...good luck in life"

Seriously? Who the hell do you think you are? Don't you ever tell me (or anyone else for that matter) what "people like me" appreciate or don't appreciate. You don't know me. Trust me, I'm not missing anything in this lifetime.

And that's the end of this conversation from my end, because I figure it is something akin to talking to a brick wall.
 

Deuce

Banned
Perhaps the real question is 'who in hell do you think you are?'
If you are above being criticized or disagreed with, please share the reason.
Royalty, perhaps?

Jesus - you make a statement like you don't give a damn about doubles unless singles players (well known 'stars') are playing doubles. A statement like that deserves comment - and I made the most appropriate comment I could think of.
And I stand by it. If you only like doubles when the 'star' players play, then you don't appreciate tennis nearly as much as you appreciate 'stardom' and 'fame'.

Don't kill the messenger, bud.
 

SiLvErX

Rookie
It's fun to see supposed tennis fans who think that two top singles players will automatically make for an "awesome" doubles team.
Most people seem to have no idea that doubles is an entirely different game than singles.

By the way - Hewitt and Nadal quit the doubles after their first match. This is no surprise - these guys don't give a damn about doubles, and I'm sure they knew they'd quit after one round if one of them was still in the singles draw. Why enter in the first place, then?

Sure, it was nice that some fans got to see Hewitt and Nadal play doubles together. But to quit after one round (which was very likely pre-planned) shows a decided lack of integrity and a lack of respect for the game itself.
I agree totaly... It was a little odd to me how nobody noticed Djokovic/Zimonjic as a good double,cause zimonjic is really great doubles player and Novak beeeing N#3 in the world ...hm
 
It's fun to see supposed tennis fans who think that two top singles players will automatically make for an "awesome" doubles team.
Most people seem to have no idea that doubles is an entirely different game than singles.

Actually I think most people are quite aware of this...it's just that these 'doubles specialists' are frankly pretty poor and so any on form singles specialist definitely has a good shot...if they take it seriously enough.
need an example? just look at the way the Bryans struggled against Roger and Allegro.

Enough said.
 
Last edited:

Don II

New User
Watching doubles is boring as ****, and the only reason why I would even consider watching it if there was some well known singles players playing in it. These so called "doubles specialists" should just be happy they get paid since its the singles that brings in the money.

Doubles is and always will be, a place for failed singles players to go to scrape a few bucks together
 

Deuce

Banned
Actually I think most people are quite aware of this...it's just that these 'doubles specialists' are frankly pretty poor and so any on form singles specialist definitely has a good shot...if they take it seriously enough.
need an example? just look at the way the Bryans struggled against Roger and Allegro.

Enough said.
Sorry, but you'll have to find a lot more than merely one isolated example to convince me of the validity of your position.
 
Top