Good 1hbh rackets

thejuice

Hall of Fame
Pro Kennex Redondo Mid/MP, Head Prestige Mid/MP, Wilson K90/K95, Fischer M-Speed Pro. 1, Pure Control, M-Fil 200/300, Dunlop MW 200G
 

haerdalis

Hall of Fame
My backhand felt very good with the PK core1 #6. Something about that shape that made the balance great for onehanders.
Still I cant think of a better racquet than the Pk type R.
 

MrAWD

Semi-Pro
So far Prokennex Redondo Mid is the best one for the one handed backhand that I ever hit with! As a matter of fact my opponent told me last time that he stopped forcing his balls on my backhand side lately due to really nice returns he gets from me when using the Redondo! Those that come at the tough angle and running away from him on his weaker side!! :)

Fedja
 

Tchocky

Hall of Fame
I would recommend a smaller head, 95 sq. inches or less and not too flexible but a firm feel.
 
Pro Staffs and Prestiges reign supreme for the one hander in my opinion. I dig the RDS 002 Tour and Fischer M Speed as alternates as well.

I have too many racquets. Who needs one?
 

pow

Hall of Fame
So far Prokennex Redondo Mid is the best one for the one handed backhand that I ever hit with! As a matter of fact my opponent told me last time that he stopped forcing his balls on my backhand side lately due to really nice returns he gets from me when using the Redondo! Those that come at the tough angle and running away from him on his weaker side!! :)

Fedja

I agree, I've been hitting the best 1hbh I've ever hit with a ProKennex Redondo 93

It's 12.1oz, 12pt hl, 93 head, dense string pattern... I like it because it tames it down without my backhand sailing and I get a lot of feel and a sense of extra dwell time. Before this racquet, I didn't know the meaning of backhand winners.
 

MrAWD

Semi-Pro
I agree, I've been hitting the best 1hbh I've ever hit with a ProKennex Redondo 93

It's 12.1oz, 12pt hl, 93 head, dense string pattern... I like it because it tames it down without my backhand sailing and I get a lot of feel and a sense of extra dwell time. Before this racquet, I didn't know the meaning of backhand winners.
Interesting thing is that it almost feels like I make more spin with the backhand compared to the forehand side. The only reasonable explanation for this is that I hit with much more power on the forehand side and probably more flat so the ball's trajectory is somewhat different!

Fedja
 

louis netman

Hall of Fame
Pro Staffs and Prestiges reign supreme for the one hander in my opinion. I dig the RDS 002 Tour and Fischer M Speed as alternates as well.

I have too many racquets. Who needs one?

After my torn rotator cuff, my OH-TS-BH became relatively dormant...that is, until I had a brief demo with the 002 Tour...
 

Guga_x

Rookie
So rounding up the ultimate 1hbh racket it would be:

- 95 sq in
+ 315 g
+ 8 pt hl
+ 65 - 69 stifness
dense string pattern (18x19 or 18x20)

Something like this right?
 

Ripper

Hall of Fame
Hummm, I see the "smaller heads are better for one hand backhands myth" is still going on strong in many people's heads. People, that's just a myth. Selecting a good one hand backhand racquet depends on the player's strength and technique. Most one hand backhanders will feel better with a racquet which's general weight and swing weight is not so high. The rest (flex rating, head size, overall length, string pattern, ETCETERA) has nothing to do with it.
 
I must say the tour 90 hits like a piece of wood but on the backhand side when you strike the ball perfectly there is no better racquet.
 

BreakPoint

Bionic Poster
Hummm, I see the "smaller heads are better for one hand backhands myth" is still going on strong in many people's heads. People, that's just a myth. Selecting a good one hand backhand racquet depends on the player's strength and technique. Most one hand backhanders will feel better with a racquet which's general weight and swing weight is not so high. The rest (flex rating, head size, overall length, string pattern, ETCETERA) has nothing to do with it.
How can it be a myth when just about everyone has had the same experience? :confused:

If just about everyone who has hit serves with a PS 6.0 85 say that it's great for serves, is it still a "myth" that the PS 6.0 85 is a great serving racquet?
 

[K]aotic

Semi-Pro
umm well smaller head sizes offer thinner necks or throats(watever u call it). therefore, its easier to grip there with one hand compared to a wide shaft like a babolat.
 
i use a n 6.1 95 and it's done me good for 1hbh

I agree with this comment but sometimes I spray the ball if i'm not careful and take an almighty swing. Would love to use the K90 from all these good comments it sounds like the "real" deal.
 

pow

Hall of Fame
Hummm, I see the "smaller heads are better for one hand backhands myth" is still going on strong in many people's heads. People, that's just a myth. Selecting a good one hand backhand racquet depends on the player's strength and technique. Most one hand backhanders will feel better with a racquet which's general weight and swing weight is not so high. The rest (flex rating, head size, overall length, string pattern, ETCETERA) has nothing to do with it.

I agree, you just have to find what really works for you yourself.
I happen to like a smaller head flexy tight string patterned racquet but that by no means show that it will work better for anyone else. My friends and I all play with very distinctively different racquets and we can't stand each other's racquet/string choices. :)
 
Hummm, I see the "smaller heads are better for one hand backhands myth" is still going on strong in many people's heads. People, that's just a myth. Selecting a good one hand backhand racquet depends on the player's strength and technique. Most one hand backhanders will feel better with a racquet which's general weight and swing weight is not so high. The rest (flex rating, head size, overall length, string pattern, ETCETERA) has nothing to do with it.

It's an opinion. It can't be a myth.

But to say that headsize doesn't matter with the one hander is wrong. The one handed backhand demands space more than any other ground stroke as it comes closest to hitting the body (left outer thigh) than any other stroke. This means that a smaller head can put the sweetspot tighter to the body than a larger head.

It's simple geometry.
 

astra

Rookie
Hummm, I see the "smaller heads are better for one hand backhands myth" is still going on strong in many people's heads. People, that's just a myth. Selecting a good one hand backhand racquet depends on the player's strength and technique. Most one hand backhanders will feel better with a racquet which's general weight and swing weight is not so high. The rest (flex rating, head size, overall length, string pattern, ETCETERA) has nothing to do with it.
I agree. My personal exception is the preference of heavier and headlight racquets for 1HB (actually LM Prestige MP customized to cca 360g; 10 points headlight). However, a week ago I tested lighter racquets (RDS001 MP, Pure Drive) especially for 1HB topspin and these worked suprisingly well. As for slice - my Head is best, than PD, RDS001 the worst of the three.
 

cys19

Semi-Pro
It's an opinion. It can't be a myth.

But to say that headsize doesn't matter with the one hander is wrong. The one handed backhand demands space more than any other ground stroke as it comes closest to hitting the body (left outer thigh) than any other stroke. This means that a smaller head can put the sweetspot tighter to the body than a larger head.

It's simple geometry.

I hit my knee many times when hitting low balls. Maybe MP is too big?
 

BigGriff

Semi-Pro
I agree with Ripper. It is simply a matter of personal preference. There are plenty of pros that use sticks bigger than 95in.

After a little practice with my PDR standard to get my timing, I hit a consistent one-hander with plenty of variety.
 

fgs

Hall of Fame
stormholloway,
i only hit slices onehanded and do well with my 106 blades, but that issue of geometry needs some rethinking:
the sweetspot on an os is closer to the hand as on a mp or mid, simply because the stringbed will extend more towards the handle than on a mid.
there are other factors like increased torsional stability of (most) smaller frames or less stringbeddeflection of (all) smaller frames that make some people prefer smaller headsizes for the 1hbh.
 

JBennett

New User
1HBH rackets

The small framed, heavy weighted players rackets seem to be favored in the 1HBH world, but there are a few exceptions. Some rackets id recommend would be the POG, Dunlop M-Fil 200 ,Wilson N 6.1 Tour 90 and 95, Prince Tour Diablo, Wilson nBlade and surprisingly the Babolat Pure Storm. With that said, this is the ONLY babolat frame other then maybe the Pure Control that is even possible to attempt a decent 1hbh with and i am a babolat user lol.
 
The one closest to the ball. My right knee, since I'm right handed and I hit my backhand in a closed stance.

It's good to keep the stroke tight to the body in general, but once you release your off hand near the hip the racquet should drop to knee height, and you should start to straighten the front leg. The straightening of the front leg will be part of what lifts the racquet face across the ball. The straight leg will also help you avoid hitting your knee--i.e. it's much harder to hit your knee if your leg is straightened.
 

Ripper

Hall of Fame
So, the reason that a mid size racquet head suits a 1hbh is based on geometry???!!! LOL!!!

Look, there are many ways to hit a 1hbh (and a fh or any stroke, for that matter). The majority of amateur players (and pros, up to a point) can't hit a Gasquet and/or a Henin type of bh, which is what I model my bh after. That type of 1hbh doesn't go well with a mid size head, unless your last name is Federer (and, even, mighty Federer has problems with his bh, because of his racquet's head size). Many people slice most of their backhands. And many others hit an, almost, flat 1hbh. It's true, these people could benefit from the control and/or low power offered by a mid size head. The problem with this "theory" and the reason I call it a myth is that it generalizes and that's where it's wrong. Not all 1 hand backhands are the same, because not all people are the same. So, it's wrong to, simply, say that all 1 hand backhanders would play better by using mid size heads. Ok, now, go use whatever you feel happy with and let me be :)
 

josef

Rookie
oook.. back on topic

um my two choices at least for ME are the Wilson nBlade 98 and ProKennex Redondo MP. not sure WHY this is.. but it is.. for me i mean.. ;)
 

cys19

Semi-Pro
It's good to keep the stroke tight to the body in general, but once you release your off hand near the hip the racquet should drop to knee height, and you should start to straighten the front leg. The straightening of the front leg will be part of what lifts the racquet face across the ball. The straight leg will also help you avoid hitting your knee--i.e. it's much harder to hit your knee if your leg is straightened.

It's rare for me to hit low balls b/c I tend to take balls on the rise, but when I try to teach myself to hit low balls, this is what I put into my head:
2006_08_08_federer_backhand_2.jpg


Either that or I bend my back forward, which is bad for my back I think, but my 4.5 friend does it.
 
It's rare for me to hit low balls b/c I tend to take balls on the rise, but when I try to teach myself to hit low balls, this is what I put into my head:
2006_08_08_federer_backhand_2.jpg


Either that or I bend my back forward, which is bad for my back I think, but my 4.5 friend does it.

But wouldn't balls taken on the rise be relatively low?

Low balls tend to nullify what I said, because straightening the leg just prior to contact would be counter-productive.

Honestly I'm more likely to hit my back leg than front. The concave curve of the throat tends to dodge my knee typically (just from doing mock swings in my kitchen here). Even with the hitting hand pretty tight to the body, my front knee isn't in real danger. Of course, we're two different people with two different swings.

I would say try some slow swings that don't hit your knee. Then repeat that swing until it's natural.
 

ubel

Professional
when I would occasionally hit my knee on my hand handers, i was both making contact with the ball too late (not enough in front of my body) and also too close to my body (horizontally close and not allowing my arm to fully extend). doesn't have too much to do with how big your racquet is, but more along the lines of your footwork and swing-path. also, to an extent, your grip could be causing problems as a grip too close to a continental grip can cause one to take the ball a little later than would be desirable.

personally, i love my PS6.0 95 for 1HBHs; it's a thing of beauty when I can hit a nice, crisp backhand with it and know the ball is going exactly where i want it to :)
 
Last edited:
S

Swiftslaughter

Guest
oook.. back on topic

um my two choices at least for ME are the Wilson nBlade 98 and ProKennex Redondo MP. not sure WHY this is.. but it is.. for me i mean.. ;)

I'm a two handed backhand man, but I think the radical is a great one hand backhand racket. I would think the lighter weight and bigger head would give you extra spin on your strokes!
 

herosol

Professional
federer is basically has his knee touching the ground lol?!

anyways. in my opinion.

good 1HBH rackets have a beam width of LESS THEN OR EQUAL TO 21 mm

why? comfort. holding huge beam widths is just so hard to grab hold of.
 

BreakPoint

Bionic Poster
personally, i love my PS6.0 95 for 1HBHs; it's a thing of beauty when I can hit a nice, crisp backhand with it and know the ball is going exactly where i want it to :)
I know EXACTLY what you mean. :D

BTW, whenever I hit my knee on my 1HBH, it's usually a low shot and it's with the butt of the handle.
 
Top