ITF Chief will "do everything" to get Rafael Nadal to play the Paris Olympics in 2024

pirhaksar

Professional
Draws are luck-based and not at all a factor that you think they are. There’s a reason I hardly bash Nadal for “easy draws” despite the fact he’s had many runs where he hasn’t faced top 10 competition.
Yeah good luck making that point to delusional fanatics on here
 

big ted

Legend
all of this that you say is completely irrelevant and was NEVER even mentioned in court. he was expelled for political reasons that had nothing to do with his visa, exemption or any of the things you mentioned!

they can’t prove he faked covid but they took it all into account trust me… they didn’t want him there and they used whatever would work to get him out. he was a menace to society… either he faked it or he got covid at just the right time to be eligible for exemption & then he goes around infecting people. when he got to australia his travel documents said he hasn’t traveled anywhere in 14 days but there were pictures of him practicing in spain. he made alot of mistakes of course they kicked him out
 

octobrina10

Talk Tennis Guru
Yes, you are.
...
You Fedal fanatics had all the readers in your pocket for 15 long years. Times have finally changed. Masks have fallen. And cheating of Nadal will come out big time, people will be shocked, but deep down they know the news already.
Djoko fanatics have cheated readers by generating false stories about Rafa on TTW for years. Your two latest posts are evidence that this continues.
 

GoatNo1

Professional
they can’t prove he faked covid but they took it all into account trust me… they didn’t want him there and they used whatever would work to get him out. he was a menace to society… either he faked it or he got covid at just the right time to be eligible for exemption & then he goes around infecting people. when he got to australia his travel documents said he hasn’t traveled anywhere in 14 days but there were pictures of him practicing in spain. he made alot of mistakes of course they kicked him out
that's not how courts and laws work. none of that was taken into account and the judgment had nothing to do with it. I watched both trials directly and read a lot about them. at the first trial, the judge even warned that he did not want any rumors and unproven speculations in court. the first trial was interrupted by the state lawyers themselves and they agreed to all the points of Nolet's team, but immediately warned that the Minister of Immigration has the right to deport him whenever he wants and without any justification. and advised him to leave the country on his own accord because otherwise he would face a three-year ban. he was released and trained at AO, only to be kicked out with a three-year ban just before the start of the tournament (the draw had already been made with him in). the second trial was just a formality and a farce because the minister has almost unlimited powers to do as he pleases.

however, all that hubbub did contribute to the awakening and expansion of many sentiments, although they were not decisive for the current changes, nor were they the sentiments that the minister referred to.

not long after, the following things happened:

1. the big OZIland lithium mining company lost a big contract in Serbia. there were protests against it a long time ago, but the opposition flared up with all the events surrounding the noles saga. and it is interesting that Nole himself has already supported the protests before all **** that hepened.

2. many refugees who languished for years in the same prison where Nole was detained and without any committed crime were released after their case came to the limelight thanks to a much more famous prisoner.

3. the government of that time lost the near upcoming elections, which is why they expelled Nole in order to get some votes on the negative mood of the masses against Nole who was vilified by the media.
 

octobrina10

Talk Tennis Guru
that's not how courts and laws work. none of that was taken into account and the judgment had nothing to do with it. I watched both trials directly and read a lot about them. at the first trial, the judge even warned that he did not want any rumors and unproven speculations in court. the first trial was interrupted by the state lawyers themselves and they agreed to all the points of Nolet's team ...
You obviously didn't listen to properly. The counsel for the Minister just "conceded that the process adopted by her delegate was, as Mr Djokovic alleged, legally unreasonable by reason of a denial of procedural fairness.” (Source: the court documents.)
 

GoatNo1

Professional
You obviously didn't listen to properly. The counsel for the Minister just "conceded that the process adopted by her delegate was, as Mr Djokovic alleged, legally unreasonable by reason of a denial of procedural fairness.” (Source: the court documents.)
it was their excuse not to admit how screwed up they were. they agreed to everything and nole was immediately released. precisely because they did not want to wait for a verdict that would be completely in his favor and that would be a total embarrassment for the government. they stopped the trial themselves. in the repeated trial, the lawyer explicitly said that they do not raise the question of the validity of the visa and exemption. that's okay he said. they initiated a completely different procedure to which the minister always has the right. if the visa or exemption were not valid, they would go for it and not bother with anti-terrorist laws to expel one athlete. with which they only left the impression of complete dictatorship and lawlessness.
 

octobrina10

Talk Tennis Guru
it was their excuse not to admit how screwed up they were. they agreed to everything and nole was immediately released. precisely because they did not want to wait for a verdict that would be completely in his favor and that would be a total embarrassment for the government. they stopped the trial themselves. in the repeated trial, the lawyer explicitly said that they do not raise the question of the validity of the visa and exemption. that's okay he said. they initiated a completely different procedure to which the minister always has the right. if the visa or exemption were not valid, they would go for it and not bother with anti-terrorist laws to expel one athlete. with which they only left the impression of complete dictatorship and lawlessness.

The court "made an order quashing the purported cancellation decision" just because "the process adopted by the Minister's delegate was legally unreasonable by reason of a denial of procedural fairness." (Source: the court documents.)
Then the Minister cancelled the visa because the government needed to close the case quickly. Djoko's lawyers would have dragged out the case for months.
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
The court "made an order quashing the purported cancellation decision" just because "the process adopted by the Minister's delegate was legally unreasonable by reason of a denial of procedural fairness." (Source: the court documents.)
Then the Minister cancelled the visa because the government needed to close the case quickly. Djoko's lawyers would have dragged out the case for months.No

None of the above is factual. The following are legal facts:

1. The Government's purported cancellation of Djokovic's visa at the border was acknowledged as illegal by the government itself and his visa to enter was restored.

2. The Government then used a provision designed to deport terrorists rapidly and, hence, a Minister declared Djokovic a threat to good order on the basis of one BBC interview.
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
it was their excuse not to admit how screwed up they were. they agreed to everything and nole was immediately released. precisely because they did not want to wait for a verdict that would be completely in his favor and that would be a total embarrassment for the government. they stopped the trial themselves. in the repeated trial, the lawyer explicitly said that they do not raise the question of the validity of the visa and exemption. that's okay he said. they initiated a completely different procedure to which the minister always has the right. if the visa or exemption were not valid, they would go for it and not bother with anti-terrorist laws to expel one athlete. with which they only left the impression of complete dictatorship and lawlessness.

The government stopped the first trial because they knew they could not win and the second trial only examined the issue of whether the Minister had made a completely arbitrary decision.

So you are indeed correct.
 

octobrina10

Talk Tennis Guru
None of the above is factual. The following are legal facts:

1. The Government's purported cancellation of Djokovic's visa at the border was acknowledged as illegal by the government itself and his visa to enter was restored.

2. The Government then used a provision designed to deport terrorists rapidly and, hence, a Minister declared Djokovic a threat to good order on the basis of one BBC interview.
The facts are (an excerpt from the court documents):

F97nf9cWwAEYdEN
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
This is the second case. And it says what I said under point 2. The Minister is allowed to define anyone as a threat to public order even if the evidence is trivial. It just has to be pertinent.

The facts are (an excerpt from the court documents):

F97nf9cWwAEYdEN
 
Top