Dominic Thiem beat Roger Federer 3-6, 6-3, 7-5 in the Indian Wells final, 2019 on hard court
It was Thiem's to date only Masters title and first final on hard court. Federer was playing in record extending 9th final at the event and remains the co-leader with 5 titles with Novak Djokovic. Federer would shortly after win the title in Miami
Thiem won 95 points, Federer 86
Serve Stats
Thiem...
- 1st serve percentage (67/97) 69%
- 1st serve points won (47/67) 70%
- 2nd serve points won (18/30) 60%
- Aces 1, Service Winners 1
- Double Faults 3
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (28/97) 29%
Federer...
- 1st serve percentage (59/84) 70%
- 1st serve points won (42/59) 71%
- 2nd serve points won (12/25) 48%
- Aces 3
- Double Faults 2
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (19/84) 23%
Serve Pattern
Thiem served...
- to FH 29%
- to BH 70%
- to Body 1%
Federer served...
- to FH 29%
- to BH 65%
- to Body 6%
Return Stats
Thiem made...
- 63 (21 FH, 42 BH), including 2 runaround FHs
- 1 Winner (1 BH)
- 16 Errors, comprising...
- 5 Unforced (1 FH, 4 BH)
- 11 Forced (4 FH, 7 BH)
- Return Rate (63/82) 77%
Federer made...
- 66 (18 FH, 48 BH), including 1 drop-return
- 3 Winners (1 FH, 2 BH)
- 26 Errors, comprising...
- 12 Unforced (2 FH, 10 BH), including 1 return-approach attempt
- 14 Forced (7 FH, 7 BH)
- Return Rate (66/94) 70%
Break Points
Thiem 3/4 (3 games)
Federer 2/11 (4 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding aces)
Thiem 22 (14 FH, 4 BH, 2 BHV, 2 OH)
Federer 20 (6 FH, 4 BH, 4 FHV, 1 FH1/2V, 2 BHV, 3 OH)
Thiem's FHs - 2 cc (1 pass), 2 dtl, 7 inside-out, 1 inside-in and 2 running-down-drop-shot cc passes at net
- BHs - 1 cc return pass, 2 dtl and 1 dtl/inside-out pass
Federer's FHs - 1 cc, 1 dtl, 2 inside-in (1 return), 1 longline (for which Thiem was on the ground) and 1 drop shot
- BHs - 1 cc, 1 dtl return, 1 inside-in return and 1 drop shot
- 4 from serve-volley points - 2 first volleys (1 FHV, 1 BHV) & 2 second volleys (2 OH)
- 1 other FHV was a swinging shot, 1 OH on bounce from baseline and the FH1/V was a non-net shot from no-man's land
Errors (excluding returns and serves)
Thiem 44
- 28 Unforced (16 FH, 12 BH)... with 1 FH running-down-drop-shot at net
- 16 Forced (8 FH, 7 BH, 1 FHV)... with 2 FH running-down-drop-shot at net & 1 BH running-down-drop-shot at net
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 45.4
Federer 43
- 30 Unforced (15 FH, 15 BH)... with 1 FH pass attempt, 1 BH running-drop-shot at net & 1 BH was an incorrect challenge
- 13 Forced (3 FH, 8 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV)
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 46
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: The 'Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is a measure of how aggressive of intent the average UE made was. 60 is maximum, 20 is minimum. This match has been scored using a four point scale - 2 defensive, 4 neutral, 5 attacking, 6 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Thiem was...
- 11/16 (69%) at net
Federer was...
- 26/35 (74%) at net, including...
- 10/13 (77%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 9/10 (90%) off 1st serve and...
- 1/3 (33%) off 2nd serve
---
- 1/2 forced back
Match Report
Good match of contrasting styles. Thiem hammers away from the back, Federer takes to net and uses drop shots to attack. Action is close and would favour Thiem in the decider as he's particularly brutal in his hitting, but its a 1-good-game/1-bad-game to decide sets encounter where result is up in the air. Court is slow
Points of interest are Federer's returning style and the differences in the way two players look to finish points. Statistically anyway, the former leads to the biggest difference between the two players (in actuality, match is decided by ironic against-runs-of-patterns happenings - more on that later)
Winners - Thiem 22, Fed 20
Errors Forced - Thiem 13, Fed 16
UEs - Thiem 28, Fed 30
(Double Faults - Thiem 3, Fed 2)
Comes out dead even - Thiem 67 points, Fed 67. Leaving -
- Unreturned serves - Thiem 29%, Fed 23%
Its not crucial as far as determining match outcome goes. As stated earlier, its a 1-good-or-bad game to determine outcome of sets match. Where it is important is in what's not happening that could reasonably be happening viz. Fed's freebies being kept down to minimum
Federer serves well, considerably better than Thiem. While making 70% first serves in, he's constantly hitting his spots out wide while Thiem serves in Fed's swing zone. With Fed also serve-volleying a fair amount (13 times - 10 of first serves), 1 possiblity for Fed to come out ahead is with a boatload of unreturned serves.
Court is slow, but wouldn't be the first time Fed's serve has overcome that hurdle. He had over 40% unreturned on similar surface against Rafael Nadal in '17 Indian Wells and on clay against Novak Djokovic in '11 French Open to give 2 examples.
To be clear, its not a court where you would want to count on unreturned serves to blow away good returners, but Thiem keeping Fed down to low 23% unreturned rate reflects an exceptional job on the return. Does it without leaving Fed too much advantage for the third ball too - and Fed doesn't have the power off the ground to be too damaging on this court
Thiem mixes up return position - often taking second serves from well behind baseline but usually keeping orthodox postion couple steps behind baseline. He returns he challenging Fed serve without strain
On flip side, Fed takes an Agassi-like early position, returning first serves from on baseline and seconds a step or 2 inside. Thiem serves decently, but wouldn't be a problem to get returns in play from normal position. Fed's early one leads to errors - he's got 12/26 of his return errors have been marked UEs, as opposed to 5/16 for Thiem - but he's also able to rush Thiem when he makes the return (as well as having 3 winners, which is unusal for him)
Its a long-term percentage strategy. Fed's bound to miss returns that would routine from where he's taking them, but if he can get few in in a row (ending a point or 2 best case scenario or putting Thiem on defensive), its likely to lead to breaks. At cost of giving up easy holds when he misses. Strategy works assuming Fed can hold regularly, which you'd back him too (and he does). It also minimizes longer, grueling baseline rallies that would likely favour Thiem (and end up doing)
Is giving up 29% unreturned serves an acceptable cost for that? Potentially, but it turns out not be, for which I'd credit Thiem's play. Thiem wins 60% 2nd serve points (much higher than Fed's 48%) despite having 1 more double fault. First serve in and 1st serve points won are virtually the same (Fed +1% on both)
It was Thiem's to date only Masters title and first final on hard court. Federer was playing in record extending 9th final at the event and remains the co-leader with 5 titles with Novak Djokovic. Federer would shortly after win the title in Miami
Thiem won 95 points, Federer 86
Serve Stats
Thiem...
- 1st serve percentage (67/97) 69%
- 1st serve points won (47/67) 70%
- 2nd serve points won (18/30) 60%
- Aces 1, Service Winners 1
- Double Faults 3
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (28/97) 29%
Federer...
- 1st serve percentage (59/84) 70%
- 1st serve points won (42/59) 71%
- 2nd serve points won (12/25) 48%
- Aces 3
- Double Faults 2
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (19/84) 23%
Serve Pattern
Thiem served...
- to FH 29%
- to BH 70%
- to Body 1%
Federer served...
- to FH 29%
- to BH 65%
- to Body 6%
Return Stats
Thiem made...
- 63 (21 FH, 42 BH), including 2 runaround FHs
- 1 Winner (1 BH)
- 16 Errors, comprising...
- 5 Unforced (1 FH, 4 BH)
- 11 Forced (4 FH, 7 BH)
- Return Rate (63/82) 77%
Federer made...
- 66 (18 FH, 48 BH), including 1 drop-return
- 3 Winners (1 FH, 2 BH)
- 26 Errors, comprising...
- 12 Unforced (2 FH, 10 BH), including 1 return-approach attempt
- 14 Forced (7 FH, 7 BH)
- Return Rate (66/94) 70%
Break Points
Thiem 3/4 (3 games)
Federer 2/11 (4 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding aces)
Thiem 22 (14 FH, 4 BH, 2 BHV, 2 OH)
Federer 20 (6 FH, 4 BH, 4 FHV, 1 FH1/2V, 2 BHV, 3 OH)
Thiem's FHs - 2 cc (1 pass), 2 dtl, 7 inside-out, 1 inside-in and 2 running-down-drop-shot cc passes at net
- BHs - 1 cc return pass, 2 dtl and 1 dtl/inside-out pass
Federer's FHs - 1 cc, 1 dtl, 2 inside-in (1 return), 1 longline (for which Thiem was on the ground) and 1 drop shot
- BHs - 1 cc, 1 dtl return, 1 inside-in return and 1 drop shot
- 4 from serve-volley points - 2 first volleys (1 FHV, 1 BHV) & 2 second volleys (2 OH)
- 1 other FHV was a swinging shot, 1 OH on bounce from baseline and the FH1/V was a non-net shot from no-man's land
Errors (excluding returns and serves)
Thiem 44
- 28 Unforced (16 FH, 12 BH)... with 1 FH running-down-drop-shot at net
- 16 Forced (8 FH, 7 BH, 1 FHV)... with 2 FH running-down-drop-shot at net & 1 BH running-down-drop-shot at net
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 45.4
Federer 43
- 30 Unforced (15 FH, 15 BH)... with 1 FH pass attempt, 1 BH running-drop-shot at net & 1 BH was an incorrect challenge
- 13 Forced (3 FH, 8 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV)
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 46
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: The 'Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is a measure of how aggressive of intent the average UE made was. 60 is maximum, 20 is minimum. This match has been scored using a four point scale - 2 defensive, 4 neutral, 5 attacking, 6 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Thiem was...
- 11/16 (69%) at net
Federer was...
- 26/35 (74%) at net, including...
- 10/13 (77%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 9/10 (90%) off 1st serve and...
- 1/3 (33%) off 2nd serve
---
- 1/2 forced back
Match Report
Good match of contrasting styles. Thiem hammers away from the back, Federer takes to net and uses drop shots to attack. Action is close and would favour Thiem in the decider as he's particularly brutal in his hitting, but its a 1-good-game/1-bad-game to decide sets encounter where result is up in the air. Court is slow
Points of interest are Federer's returning style and the differences in the way two players look to finish points. Statistically anyway, the former leads to the biggest difference between the two players (in actuality, match is decided by ironic against-runs-of-patterns happenings - more on that later)
Winners - Thiem 22, Fed 20
Errors Forced - Thiem 13, Fed 16
UEs - Thiem 28, Fed 30
(Double Faults - Thiem 3, Fed 2)
Comes out dead even - Thiem 67 points, Fed 67. Leaving -
- Unreturned serves - Thiem 29%, Fed 23%
Its not crucial as far as determining match outcome goes. As stated earlier, its a 1-good-or-bad game to determine outcome of sets match. Where it is important is in what's not happening that could reasonably be happening viz. Fed's freebies being kept down to minimum
Federer serves well, considerably better than Thiem. While making 70% first serves in, he's constantly hitting his spots out wide while Thiem serves in Fed's swing zone. With Fed also serve-volleying a fair amount (13 times - 10 of first serves), 1 possiblity for Fed to come out ahead is with a boatload of unreturned serves.
Court is slow, but wouldn't be the first time Fed's serve has overcome that hurdle. He had over 40% unreturned on similar surface against Rafael Nadal in '17 Indian Wells and on clay against Novak Djokovic in '11 French Open to give 2 examples.
To be clear, its not a court where you would want to count on unreturned serves to blow away good returners, but Thiem keeping Fed down to low 23% unreturned rate reflects an exceptional job on the return. Does it without leaving Fed too much advantage for the third ball too - and Fed doesn't have the power off the ground to be too damaging on this court
Thiem mixes up return position - often taking second serves from well behind baseline but usually keeping orthodox postion couple steps behind baseline. He returns he challenging Fed serve without strain
On flip side, Fed takes an Agassi-like early position, returning first serves from on baseline and seconds a step or 2 inside. Thiem serves decently, but wouldn't be a problem to get returns in play from normal position. Fed's early one leads to errors - he's got 12/26 of his return errors have been marked UEs, as opposed to 5/16 for Thiem - but he's also able to rush Thiem when he makes the return (as well as having 3 winners, which is unusal for him)
Its a long-term percentage strategy. Fed's bound to miss returns that would routine from where he's taking them, but if he can get few in in a row (ending a point or 2 best case scenario or putting Thiem on defensive), its likely to lead to breaks. At cost of giving up easy holds when he misses. Strategy works assuming Fed can hold regularly, which you'd back him too (and he does). It also minimizes longer, grueling baseline rallies that would likely favour Thiem (and end up doing)
Is giving up 29% unreturned serves an acceptable cost for that? Potentially, but it turns out not be, for which I'd credit Thiem's play. Thiem wins 60% 2nd serve points (much higher than Fed's 48%) despite having 1 more double fault. First serve in and 1st serve points won are virtually the same (Fed +1% on both)
Last edited: