Steve Tignor's Wimbledon Final prediction: Federer d. Djokovic

Aabye5

G.O.A.T.
And over there at tennis.com, Steve makes the boldest prediction of them all. I wonder what's his secret TTW handle is.

Sarcasm aside, a Fed VS Djok final will be a testament to tennis fans dropping to WWE levels of neutrality. Throwing objects at the Serb is not out of the question.

I don't think I have personally ever seen Tignor get it right, although I haven't followed him recently.
 

Jack the Hack

Hall of Fame
This was Tignor's comment about his pick of Federer to win the tournament:

"He didn’t show much in Halle, but his draw could help him shed the rust. Despite what happened in 2019, no one knows how to close at Wimbledon like Federer."

:unsure:
 
And over there at tennis.com, Steve makes the boldest prediction of them all. I wonder what's his secret TTW handle is.

Sarcasm aside, a Fed VS Djok final will be a testament to tennis fans dropping to WWE levels of neutrality. Throwing objects at the Serb is not out of the question.
Oh sheet I’ve been rumbled
 

Jai

Professional
Tignor is basically the sureshs of tennis.com - he's basically sealed Fed's fate right away with this statement.

This would be an absolute miracle of all miracles
Frankly I think Tignor just wanted to generate a lot of buzz and clicks on the article, retweets blah blah.

Ok, nothing is IMPOSSIBLE in sport, but the chances of Fed defeating Novak this time in the final are so, so, so slim it is next to nil. The only realistic chance Fed has, is if Novak gets knocked out in earlier rounds in an utter shock result, and the rest - Zverev/Berrettini/ Tsits are unable to put out Fed. It might, just might, happen, but again, the chances are very slim; and that is not what Tignor predicted, he's gone cuckoo and has Fed winning over Novak. :)

Well, let's see. I would be amazed if that did happen. I would be actually very surprised indeed if Fed made the final.
 

daggerman

Hall of Fame
Generally I think it's wise to not count out Roger Federer, especially at Wimbledon, but I really just don't see how his movement is going to hold up over 7 Bo5 matches this year. How much improvement can be made in ~10 days when so much remained to be made after a few months (i.e., the time between Doha and Halle)?
 
D

Deleted member 771911

Guest
Lol. It’s what many people want to read and they need eyeballs so.
 
D

Deleted member 783101

Guest
I hope Djoker gives Federer a real business lesson. None of that ON teletubby stuff.
c21ca0174c832bcfdf47781455aa139b.gif
 

Aabye5

G.O.A.T.
J. Wertheim's predictions seem more accurate to me, but still a bit off.

Although my record on predicting Slams is probably worse than Tignor's.
 

jm1980

Talk Tennis Guru
Tignor actually had a pretty decent track record in predictions for a while:

Blue: guessed player correctly
Green: guessed winner/loser correctly

Tournament
Actual final
Predicted final
Semifinal 1
Semifinal 2
Predictions lost before SF
2017 WimFederer d. CilicFederer d. NadalNadal d. MurrayFederer d. DjokovicNadal: 4R; Murray: QF; Djokovic: QF
2017 USONadal d. AndersonMurray d. KyrgiosKyrgios d. DimitrovMurray d. ZverevMurray: withdrew; Kyrgios: 1R; Dimitrov: 2R; Zverev: 2R
2018 AOFederer d. CilicFederer d. KyrgiosKyrgios d. NadalFederer d. DjokovicKyrgios: 4R; Nadal: QF; Djokovic: 4R
2018 RG (archived)Nadal d. ThiemNadal d. ZverevNadal d. CilicZverev d. DjokovicCilic: QF; Zverev: QF; Djokovic: QF
2018 WimDjokovic d. AndersonFederer d. NadalFederer d. CilicNadal d. DjokovicFederer: QF; Cilic: 2R
2018 USODjokovic d. del PotroDjokovic d. NadalNadal d. WawrinkaDjokovic d. CilicWawrinka: 3R; Cilic: QF
2019 AODjokovic d. NadalDjokovic d. CilicDjokovic d. ZverevCilic d. NadalZverev: 4R; Cilic: 4R
2019 RGNadal d. ThiemNadal d. DjokovicDjokovic d. ThiemNadal d. WawrinkaWawrinka: QF
2019 WimDjokovic d. FedererDjokovic d. FedererDjokovic d. WawrinkaFederer d. CilicWawrinka: 2R; Cilic: 2R
2019 USONadal d. MedvedevDjokovic d. NadalDjokovic d. FedererNadal d. RBADjokovic: 4R; Federer: QF; RBA: 1R
2020 AODjokovic d. ThiemDjokovic d. NadalNadal d. RublevDjokovic d. FedererNadal: QF; Rublev: 4R
2020 USO (picks)Thiem d. ZverevDjokovic d. RaonicDjokovic d. TsitsipasRaonic d. MedvedevDjokovic: 4R; Tsitsipas: 3R; Raonic: 2R
2020 RG (picks)Nadal d. DjokovicNadal d. DjokovicDjokovic d. ShapovalovNadal d. ThiemShapovalov: 2R; Thiem: QF
2021 AO (archived)Djokovic d. MedvedevDjokovic d. MedvedevDjokovic d. ThiemMedvedev d. NadalThiem: 4R; Nadal: QF
2021 RGDjokovic d. TsitsipasNadal d. TsitsipasNadal d. DjokovicTsitsipas d. Zverev-
2021 WimDjokovic d. BerrettiniFederer d. DjokovicDjokovic d. TsitsipasFederer d. BerrettiniTsitsipas: 1R; Federer: QF
2021 USOMedvedev d. DjokovicDjokovic d. TsitsipasDjokovic d. ZverevTsitsipas d. MedvedevTsitsipas: 3R
2022 AONadal d. MedvedevMedvedev d. ZverevZverev d. DjokovicMedvedev d. SinnerZverev: 4R; Djokovic: withdrew; Sinner: QF
2022 RGNadal d. RuudDjokovic d. TsitsipasDjokovic d. AlcarazTsitsipas d. KecmanovicDjokovic: QF; Alcaraz: QF; Tsitsipas: 4R; Kecmanovic: 3R
2022 WimDjokovic d. KyrgiosBerrettini d. DjokovicDjokovic d. HurkaczBerrettini d. NadalHurkacz: 1R; Berrettini: withdrew
2022 USOAlcaraz d. RuudNadal d. FritzFritz d. MedvedevNadal d. HurkaczFritz: 1R; Medvedev: 4R; Nadal: 4R; Hurkacz: 2R
2023 AODjokovic d. TsitsipasDjokovic d. NadalNadal d. NorrieDjokovic d. FritzNadal: 2R; Norrie: 3R; Fritz: 2R
(tennis.com is kind of buggy, had to use the Web Archive and picks to fill in missing pieces)

I would call the 2017 USO prediction atrocious, but that draw fell apart so spectacularly that it's hard to blame him
 
Last edited:

Aabye5

G.O.A.T.
Tignor actually has a pretty decent track record in predictions recently. 9 out of the 13 last Slam winners guessed correctly!

Blue: guessed player correctly
Green: guessed winner/loser correctly

TournamentFinalSemifinal 1Semifinal 2Predictions lost before SF
2018 AOFederer d. KyrgiosKyrgios d. NadalFederer d. DjokovicKyrgios: 4R; Nadal: QF; Djokovic: 4R
2018 RG (archived)Nadal d. ZverevNadal d. CilicZverev d. DjokovicCilic: QF; Zverev: QF; Djokovic: QF
2018 WimFederer d. NadalFederer d. CilicNadal d. DjokovicFederer: QF; Cilic: 2R
2018 USODjokovic d. NadalNadal d. WawrinkaDjokovic d. CilicWawrinka: 3R; Cilic: QF
2019 AODjokovic d. CilicDjokovic d. ZverevCilic d. NadalZverev: 4R; Cilic: 4R
2019 RGNadal d. DjokovicDjokovic d. ThiemNadal d. WawrinkaWawrinka: QF
2019 WimDjokovic d. FedererDjokovic d. WawrinkaFederer d. CilicWawrinka: 2R; Cilic: 2R
2019 USODjokovic d. NadalDjokovic d. FedererNadal d. RBADjokovic: 4R; Federer: QF; RBA: 1R
2020 AODjokovic d. NadalNadal d. RublevDjokovic d. FedererNadal: QF; Rublev: 4R
2020 USO (picks)Djokovic d. RaonicDjokovic d. TsitsipasRaonic d. MedvedevDjokovic: 4R; Tsitsipas: 3R; Raonic: 2R
2020 RG (picks)Nadal d. DjokovicDjokovic d. ShapovalovNadal d. ThiemShapovalov: 2R; Thiem: QF
2021 AO (archived)Djokovic d. MedvedevDjokovic d. ThiemMedvedev d. NadalThiem: 4R; Nadal: QF
2021 RGNadal d. TsitsipasNadal d. DjokovicTsitsipas d. Zverev-
2021 WimFederer d. DjokovicDjokovic d. TsitsipasFederer d. Berrettini

(tennis.com is kind of buggy, had to use the Web Archive and picks to fill in missing pieces)

Like I said, haven't followed him recently. But you are right, that's not bad. Although anyone who picked Kyrgios to get to a Slam final before this year was a bit...ambitious?
 

jm1980

Talk Tennis Guru
And to show how much more difficult it is to guess the women's side... Tignor's picks:

Blue: guessed player correctly
Green: guessed winner/loser correctly

Tournament
Actual final
Predicted final
Semifinal 1
Semifinal 2
Predictions lost before SF
2017 WimMuguruza d. VenusKvitova d. PliskovaPliskova d. SafarovaKvitova d. Lucic-BaroniPliskova: 2R; Safarova: 2R; Kvitova: 2R; Lucic-Baroni: 1R
2017 USOStephens d. KeysMuguruza d. PliskovaPliskova d. KeysMuguruza d. HalepPliskova: QF; Muguruza: 4R; Halep: 1R
2018 AOWozniacki d. HalepSvitolina d. PliskovaPliskova d. SharapovaSvitolina d. WozniackiPliskova: QF; Sharapova: 3R; Svitolina: QF
2018 RG (archived)Halep d. StephensKvitova d. PliskovaPliskova d. HalepKvitova d. SvitolinaPliskova: 3R; Kvitova: 3R; Svitolina: 3R
2018 WimKerber d. SerenaSerena d. KvitovaKvitova d. KerberSerena d. VenusKvitova: 1R; Venus: 3R
2018 USOOsaka d. SerenaHalep d. KvitovaHalep d. StephensKvitova d. KerberHalep: 1R; Stephens: QF; Kvitova: 3R; Kerber: 3R
2019 AOOsaka d. KvitovaSerena d. KvitovaSerena d. SvitolinaKvitova d. GoergesSerena: QF; Svitolina: QF; Goerges: 1R
2019 RGBarty d. VondrousovaHalep d. PliskovaHalep d. OsakaPliskova d. StephensHalep: QF; Osaka: 1R; Pliskova: 3R; Stephens: QF
2019 WimHalep d. SerenaKerber d. KeysKerber d. KontaKeys d. PliskovaKerber: 2R; Konta: QF; Keys: 2R; Pliskova: 4R
2019 USOAndreescu d. WilliamsKeys d. HalepHalep d. OsakaKeys d. BartyHalep: 2R; Osaka: 4R; Keys: 4R; Barty: 4R
2020 AOKenin d. MuguruzaOsaka d. PliskovaOsaka d. KvitovaPliskova d. CollinsOsaka: 3R; Kvitova: QF; Pliskova: 3R; Collins: 2R
2020 USO (picks)Osaka d. AzarenkaMuguruza d. OsakaOsaka d. KerberMuguruza d. KontaKerber: 4R; Muguruza: 2R; Konta: 2R
2020 RG (archived)Swiatek d. KeninHalep d. MuguruzaHalep d. AzarenkaMuguruza d. StephensHalep: 4R; Azarenka: 2R; Muguruza: 3R; Stephens: 2R
2021 AO (archived)Osaka d. BradyOsaka d. BartyBarty d. KeninOsaka d. SerenaBarty: QF; Kenin: 2R
2021 RGKrejcikova d. PavlyuchenkovaSabalenka d. BartyBarty d. MuguruzaSabalenka d. AnisimovaBarty: 2R; Muguruza: 1R; Sabalenka: 3R; Anisimova: 1R
2021 WimBarty d. PliskovaSerena d. KvitovaSerena d. KrejcikovaKvitova d. MuguruzaSerena: 1R; Krejcikova: 4R; Kvitova: 1R; Muguruza: 3R
2021 USORaducanu d. FernandezPliskova d. KerberPliskova d. BartyKerber d. KrejcikovaPliskova: QF; Kerber: 4R; Barty: 3R; Krejcikova: QF
2022 AOBarty d. D. CollinsOsaka d. KontaveitOsaka d. KrejcikovaKontaveit d. SabalenkaOsaka: 3R; Krejcikova: QF; Kontaveit: 2R; Sabalenka: 4R
2022 RGSwiatek d. GauffSwiatek d. JabeurSwiatek d. SabalenkaJabeur d. AzarenkaSabalenka: 3R; Jabeur: 1R; Azarenka: 3R
2022 WimRybakina d. JabeurKerber d. SwiatekSwiatek d. HalepKerber d. OstapenkoSwiatek: 3R; Kerber: 3R; Ostapenko: 4R
2022 USOSwiatek d. JabeurGarcia d. ZhengZheng d. BencicGarcia d. JabeurZheng: 3R; Bencic: 3R
2023 AOSabalenka d. RybakinaSabalenka d. SwiatekSwiatek d. PegulaSabalenka d. PliskovaSwiatek: 4R; Pegula: QF; Pliskova: QF
(tennis.com is kind of buggy, had to use the Web Archive and picks to fill in missing pieces)
 
Last edited:

jm1980

Talk Tennis Guru
Like I said, haven't followed him recently. But you are right, that's not bad. Although anyone who picked Kyrgios to get to a Slam final before this year was a bit...ambitious?
Tignor seemed pretty bullish on Kyrgios; also picked him to reach the USO final in 2017 (added to table)
 

ZYW

Rookie
Of course Fed can defeat Djokovic in the final, but the chance Fed make the final is close to Zero.
 

daggerman

Hall of Fame
Tignor actually has a pretty decent track record in predictions recently. 10 out of the 15 last Slam winners guessed correctly!

Blue: guessed player correctly
Green: guessed winner/loser correctly

TournamentActual finalPredicted finalSemifinal 1Semifinal 2Predictions lost before SF
2017 WimFederer d. CilicFederer d. NadalNadal d. MurrayFederer d. DjokovicNadal: 4R; Murray: QF; Djokovic: QF
2017 USONadal d. AndersonMurray d. KrygiosKyrgios d. DimitrovMurray d. ZverevMurray: withdrew; Kyrgios: 1R; Dimitrov: 2R; Zverev: 2R
2018 AOFederer d. CilicFederer d. KyrgiosKyrgios d. NadalFederer d. DjokovicKyrgios: 4R; Nadal: QF; Djokovic: 4R
2018 RG (archived)Nadal d. ThiemNadal d. ZverevNadal d. CilicZverev d. DjokovicCilic: QF; Zverev: QF; Djokovic: QF
2018 WimDjokovic d. AndersonFederer d. NadalFederer d. CilicNadal d. DjokovicFederer: QF; Cilic: 2R
2018 USODjokovic d. del PotroDjokovic d. NadalNadal d. WawrinkaDjokovic d. CilicWawrinka: 3R; Cilic: QF
2019 AODjokovic d. NadalDjokovic d. CilicDjokovic d. ZverevCilic d. NadalZverev: 4R; Cilic: 4R
2019 RGNadal d. ThiemNadal d. DjokovicDjokovic d. ThiemNadal d. WawrinkaWawrinka: QF
2019 WimDjokovic d. FedererDjokovic d. FedererDjokovic d. WawrinkaFederer d. CilicWawrinka: 2R; Cilic: 2R
2019 USONadal d. MedvedevDjokovic d. NadalDjokovic d. FedererNadal d. RBADjokovic: 4R; Federer: QF; RBA: 1R
2020 AODjokovic d. ThiemDjokovic d. NadalNadal d. RublevDjokovic d. FedererNadal: QF; Rublev: 4R
2020 USO (picks)Thiem d. ZverevDjokovic d. RaonicDjokovic d. TsitsipasRaonic d. MedvedevDjokovic: 4R; Tsitsipas: 3R; Raonic: 2R
2020 RG (picks)Nadal d. DjokovicNadal d. DjokovicDjokovic d. ShapovalovNadal d. ThiemShapovalov: 2R; Thiem: QF
2021 AO (archived)Djokovic d. MedvedevDjokovic d. MedvedevDjokovic d. ThiemMedvedev d. NadalThiem: 4R; Nadal: QF
2021 RGDjokovic d. TsitsipasNadal d. TsitsipasNadal d. DjokovicTsitsipas d. Zverev-
2021 WimFederer d. DjokovicDjokovic d. TsitsipasFederer d. Berrettini
(tennis.com is kind of buggy, had to use the Web Archive and picks to fill in missing pieces)

I would call the 2017 USO prediction atrocious, but that draw fell apart so spectacularly that it's hard to blame him

Thanks for sharing this data!

An observation - the distribution of his winner picks nearly came to fruition:

Predicted totals
Djokovic: 7
Nadal: 4
Federer: 3
Other: 1

Actual totals
Djokovic: 7
Nadal: 5
Federer: 2
Other: 1

Pretty good stuff!
 

jm1980

Talk Tennis Guru
J. Wertheim's predictions seem more accurate to me, but still a bit off.

Although my record on predicting Slams is probably worse than Tignor's.
Wertheim made very similar predictions to Tignor, picking the same winners almost every time. But he did pick Nadal to win the USO both in 2018 and 2019 (whereas Tignor went with Djokovic for both), so he ended up with the same score of 10/15. He does seem marginally better at picking the women's side; he got 2/15 of the women's winners right

JW's picks for Wimbledon are:

Djokovic d. Tsitsipas, Berrettini d. Federer; Djokovic d. Berrettini
Barty d. Serena, Sabalenka d. Kvitova, Sabalenka d. Barty
 
Last edited:

Aabye5

G.O.A.T.
Wertheim made very similar predictions to Tignor, picking the same winners almost every time. But he did pick Nadal to the USO both in 2018 and 2019, so he ended up with the same score 13/15. He also got 1/15 of the women's winners right -- Osaka for the 2021 AO

Ah, very interesting about his results.

His predictions this year are more accurate this year (I'm guessing here) with Djoko beating Tsitsipas and Berrettini beating Fed, but I just think there might be surprise either among those 3 matches or before that even. I just don't know who the weak link is here.
 

jm1980

Talk Tennis Guru
And here are Jon Wertheim's predictions for the men.

Blue: guessed player correctly
Green: guessed winner/loser correctly

Tournament
Actual final
Predicted final
Semifinal 1
Semifinal 2
Predictions lost before SF
2017 WimFederer d. CilicFederer
2017 USONadal d. AndersonFederer
2018 AOFederer d. CilicFederer d. NadalFederer d. ZverevNadal d. DimitrovZverev: 3R; Dimitrov: QF
2018 RGNadal d. ThiemNadal d. ThiemNadal d. del PotroThiem d. ZverevZverev: QF
2018 WimDjokovic d. AndersonFederer d. NadalFederer d. CilicNadal d. DjokovicFederer: QF; Cilic: 2R
2018 USODjokovic d. del PotroNadal d. DjokovicNadal d. WawrinkaDjokovic d. ZverevWawrinka: 3R; Zverev: 3R
2019 AODjokovic d. NadalDjokovic d. FedererDjokovic d. ThiemFederer d. AndersonThiem: 2R; Federer: 4R; Anderson: 2R
2019 RGNadal d. ThiemNadal d. DjokovicDjokovic d. ThiemNadal d. BerrettiniBerrettini: 2R
2019 WimDjokovic d. FedererDjokovic d. FedererDjokovic d. ZverevFederer d. total surpriseZverev: 1R
2019 USONadal d. MedvedevNadal d. DjokovicDjokovic d. FedererNadal d. KyrgiosDjokovic: 4R; Federer: QF; Kyrgios: 3R
2020 AODjokovic d. ThiemDjokovic d. NadalNadal d. MedvedevDjokovic d. FedererNadal: QF; Medvedev: 4R
2020 USOThiem d. ZverevDjokovic d. RaonicDjokovic d. TsitsipasRaonic d. BerrettiniDjokovic: 4R; Tsitsipas: 3R; Raonic: 2R; Berrettini: 4R
2020 RGNadal d. DjokovicNadal d. DjokovicDjokovic d. ShapovalovNadal d. ThiemShapovalov: 2R; Thiem: QF
2021 AODjokovic d. MedvedevDjokovic d. MedvedevDjokovic d. ThiemMedvedev d. NadalThiem: 4R; Nadal: QF
2021 RGDjokovic d. TsitsipasNadal d. TsitsipasNadal d. DjokovicTsitsipas d. total surprise-
2021 WimDjokovic d. BerrettiniDjokovic d. BerrettiniDjokovic d. TsitsipasBerrettini d. FedererTsitsipas: 1R; Federer: QF
2021 USOMedvedev d. DjokovicDjokovic d. RublevDjokovic d. ZverevRublev d. MedvedevRublev: 3R
2022 AONadal d. MedvedevZverev d. MedvedevZverev d. Djokovic (or Nadal)Medvedev d. total surpriseZverev: 4R; Djokovic: withdrew
2022 RGNadal d. RuudDjokovic d. TsitsipasDjokovic d. AlcarazTsitsipas d. KecmanovicDjokovic: QF; Alcaraz: QF; Tsitsipas: 4R; Kecmanovic: 3R
2022 WimDjokovic d. KyrgiosDjokovic d. Auger AliassimeDjokovic d. HurkaczAuger Aliassime d. BerrettiniHurkacz: 1R; Auger Aliassime: 1R; Berrettini: withdrew
2022 USOAlcaraz d. RuudAlcaraz d. TsitsipasTsitsipas d. MedvedevAlcaraz d. NadalTsitsipas: 1R; Medvedev: 4R; Nadal: 4R
2023 AODjokovic d. TsitsipasDjokovic d. TsitsipasTsitsipas d. surprise (Korda?)Djokovic d. FritzKorda: QF; Fritz: 2R
 
Last edited:

jm1980

Talk Tennis Guru
Wertheim also struggles to predict the women's draws, although he does seem to pick them marginally better than Tignor

Blue: guessed player correctly
Green: guessed winner/loser correctly

Tournament
Actual final
Predicted final
Semifinal 1
Semifinal 2
Predictions lost before SF
2017 WimMuguruza d. VenusKvitova wins
2017 USOStephens d. KeysMuguruza wins
2018 AOWozniacki d. HalepHalep d. WozniackiHalep d. KeysWozniacki d. VenusKeys: QF; Venus: 1R
2018 RGHalep d. StephensSvitolina d. HalepHalep d. MuguruzaSvitolina d. KvitovaKvitova: 3R; Svitolina: 3R
2018 WimKerber d. SerenaHalep d. StephensHalep d. MuguruzaStephens d. VandewegheHalep: 3R; Muguruza: 2R; Stephens: 1R; Vandeweghe: 1R
2018 USOOsaka d. SerenaHalep d. KeysHalep d. StephensKeys d. KvitovaHalep: 1R; Stephens: QF; Kvitova: 3R
2019 AOOsaka d. KvitovaSabalenka d. SvitolinaSvitolina d. PliskovaSabalenka d. KerberSvitolina: QF; Sabalenka: 3R; Kerber: 4R
2019 RGBarty d. VondrousovaPliskova d. HalepHalep d. BartyPliskova d. BencicHalep: QF; Pliskova: 3R; Bencic: 3R
2019 WimHalep d. SerenaBarty d. PliskovaBarty d. total surprisePliskova d. OsakaBarty: 4R; Pliskova: 4R; Osaka: 1R
2019 USOAndreescu d. WilliamsKeys d. HalepHalep d. total surpriseKeys d. SerenaHalep: 2R; Keys: 4R
2020 AOKenin d. MuguruzaSerena d. PliskovaPliskova d. total surpriseSerena d. KeysPliskova: 3R; Serena: 3R; Keys: 3R
2020 USOOsaka d. AzarenkaOsaka d. MuguruzaOsaka d. PliskovaMuguruza d. KontaPliskova: 2R; Muguruza: 2R; Konta: 2R
2020 RGSwiatek d. KeninHalep d. MuguruzaHalep d. AzarenkaMuguruza d. KvitovaHalep: 4R; Azarenka: 2R; Muguruza: 3R
2021 AOOsaka d. BradyOsaka d. AzarenkaAzarenka d. BartyOsaka d. HalepAzarenka: 1R; Barty: QF; Halep: QF
2021 RGKrejcikova d. PavlyuchenkovaBarty d. SabalenkaBarty d. MuguruzaSabalenka d. total surpriseBarty: 2R; Muguruza: 1R; Sabalenka: 3R
2021 WimBarty d. PliskovaSabalenka d. BartyBarty d. SerenaSabalenka d. KvitovaSerena: 1R; Kvitova: 1R
2021 USORaducanu d. FernandezBarty d. SabalenkaBarty d. PliskovaSabalenka d. GauffBarty: 3R; Pliskova: QF; Gauff: 2R
2022 AOBarty d. D. CollinsMuguruza d. BartyBarty d. GauffMuguruza d. SwiatekGauff: 1R; Muguruza: 2R
2022 FOSwiatek d. GauffSwiatek d. JabeurSwiatek d. KasatkinaJabeur d. GauffJabeur: 1R
2022 WimRybakina d. JabeurSwiatek d. JabeurSwiatek d. GauffJabeur d. Maia HaddadSwiatek: 3R; Gauff: 3R; Haddad Maia: 1R
2022 USOSwiatek d. JabeurGauff d. SabalenkaSabalenka d. PegulaGauff d. KasatkinaPegula: QF; Gauff: QF; Kasatkina: 1R
2023 AOSabalenka d. RybakinaSabalenka d. PegulaPegula d. SwiatekSabalenka d. surpriseSwiatek: 4R; Pegula: QF
 
Last edited:

Tony48

Legend
Tignor actually has a pretty decent track record in predictions recently. 10 out of the 15 last Slam winners guessed correctly!

Blue: guessed player correctly
Green: guessed winner/loser correctly

TournamentActual finalPredicted finalSemifinal 1Semifinal 2Predictions lost before SF
2017 WimFederer d. CilicFederer d. NadalNadal d. MurrayFederer d. DjokovicNadal: 4R; Murray: QF; Djokovic: QF
2017 USONadal d. AndersonMurray d. KrygiosKyrgios d. DimitrovMurray d. ZverevMurray: withdrew; Kyrgios: 1R; Dimitrov: 2R; Zverev: 2R
2018 AOFederer d. CilicFederer d. KyrgiosKyrgios d. NadalFederer d. DjokovicKyrgios: 4R; Nadal: QF; Djokovic: 4R
2018 RG (archived)Nadal d. ThiemNadal d. ZverevNadal d. CilicZverev d. DjokovicCilic: QF; Zverev: QF; Djokovic: QF
2018 WimDjokovic d. AndersonFederer d. NadalFederer d. CilicNadal d. DjokovicFederer: QF; Cilic: 2R
2018 USODjokovic d. del PotroDjokovic d. NadalNadal d. WawrinkaDjokovic d. CilicWawrinka: 3R; Cilic: QF
2019 AODjokovic d. NadalDjokovic d. CilicDjokovic d. ZverevCilic d. NadalZverev: 4R; Cilic: 4R
2019 RGNadal d. ThiemNadal d. DjokovicDjokovic d. ThiemNadal d. WawrinkaWawrinka: QF
2019 WimDjokovic d. FedererDjokovic d. FedererDjokovic d. WawrinkaFederer d. CilicWawrinka: 2R; Cilic: 2R
2019 USONadal d. MedvedevDjokovic d. NadalDjokovic d. FedererNadal d. RBADjokovic: 4R; Federer: QF; RBA: 1R
2020 AODjokovic d. ThiemDjokovic d. NadalNadal d. RublevDjokovic d. FedererNadal: QF; Rublev: 4R
2020 USO (picks)Thiem d. ZverevDjokovic d. RaonicDjokovic d. TsitsipasRaonic d. MedvedevDjokovic: 4R; Tsitsipas: 3R; Raonic: 2R
2020 RG (picks)Nadal d. DjokovicNadal d. DjokovicDjokovic d. ShapovalovNadal d. ThiemShapovalov: 2R; Thiem: QF
2021 AO (archived)Djokovic d. MedvedevDjokovic d. MedvedevDjokovic d. ThiemMedvedev d. NadalThiem: 4R; Nadal: QF
2021 RGDjokovic d. TsitsipasNadal d. TsitsipasNadal d. DjokovicTsitsipas d. Zverev-
2021 WimFederer d. DjokovicDjokovic d. TsitsipasFederer d. Berrettini
(tennis.com is kind of buggy, had to use the Web Archive and picks to fill in missing pieces)

I would call the 2017 USO prediction atrocious, but that draw fell apart so spectacularly that it's hard to blame him

WTF…he predicted Kyrgios would make two slam finals??!!
 

jm1980

Talk Tennis Guru
Thanks for sharing this data!

An observation - the distribution of his winner picks nearly came to fruition:

Predicted totals
Djokovic: 7
Nadal: 4
Federer: 3
Other: 1

Actual totals
Djokovic: 7
Nadal: 5
Federer: 2
Other: 1

Pretty good stuff!
@Mainad, we have reached the sad point where poor Murray is bundled into "Other" :(
 

Nostradamus

Bionic Poster
And over there at tennis.com, Steve makes the boldest prediction of them all. I wonder what's his secret TTW handle is.

Sarcasm aside, a Fed VS Djok final will be a testament to tennis fans dropping to WWE levels of neutrality. Throwing objects at the Serb is not out of the question.
do you want to know my prediction ? Novak won't even get to the final
 

jm1980

Talk Tennis Guru
WTF…he predicted Kyrgios would make two slam finals??!!
In 2017, Kyrgios had those two wins against Djokovic, and played a really close match against Federer in Miami.

Then he made the final at Cincinnati with a pretty impressive run, beating Nadal en route

Maybe it's a bit bold to predict a Slam final based on that, but worse picks have been made

0OkAGUw.jpeg
 

Bluemoon20

New User
And over there at tennis.com, Steve makes the boldest prediction of them all. I wonder what's his secret TTW handle is.

Sarcasm aside, a Fed VS Djok final will be a testament to tennis fans dropping to WWE levels of neutrality. Throwing objects at the Serb is not out of the question.
Unlikely but if it happened probably means Djokovic remains third as it would be devastating for him. If Federer got that far he probably wins but more likely he loses to Cilic 3r
 

Rafa4LifeEver

G.O.A.T.
And over there at tennis.com, Steve makes the boldest prediction of them all. I wonder what's his secret TTW handle is.

Sarcasm aside, a Fed VS Djok final will be a testament to tennis fans dropping to WWE levels of neutrality. Throwing objects at the Serb is not out of the question.
Guess she predicted 2 years late??
 
Steve makes the boldest prediction

Not really a crazy prediction. Nadal has a vacation and Murray has a hip. Nobody else has come ahead of Roger and Novak at Wimby since 2003! 18 long years of Roger and Novak at the top. 18 years should have been more than enough to even grow a new Becker for Wimby. :)
 
I love Steve Tignor's predictions and draw breakdowns. I miss the old version of the tennis.com podcast when he teamed up with Peter Bodo.

Sometimes you have to pick with your head and sometimes with your heart, but tipping Federer is covering both bases!
 
Top