Yeah. As great as Djokovic’s achievements are at AO, we should not forget shameful losses to Istomin, Chung, Tsonga, Safin (while being bageled, too), and even... *******!Dare say this victory was actually more important, historical than winning the title.
Yes. It was a great win for the Uzbek no 1 player that day.Legit win, was Djokovic looking burnt out? Yes. But it was still a big win and a massive upset.
Yeah. As great as Djokovic’s achievements are at AO, we should not forget shameful losses to Istomin, Chung, Tsonga, Safin (while being bageled, too), and even... *******!
Big shadow on the supposed tournament’s GOAT.
Yes. It was a great win for the Uzbek no 1 player that day.
The loss to Safin is especially bad indeed.
Yeah it was a great match. Istomin missed a huge opportunity to go 2-0 in sets against the in form Dimitrov that day.Istomin was in great form that event, remember his match against Dimitrov, who was also in crazy form that event? That one was quality also.
I’m not buying the Safin propaganda, sorry.Totally shameful loss, that one to Safin. The same Safin who went onto to beat peak Federer a few rounds later.
Yeah it was a great match. Istomin missed a huge opportunity to go 2-0 in sets against the in form Dimitrov that day.
I’m not buying the Safin propaganda, sorry.
He is cool and edgy so we will praise him at all costs. On twitter, Safin even was declared the highest peak level at US Open EVER, lol! 80% of voters probably didn’t even watch that match against Sapmras, they just know it’s SaFiN.And what is the propaganda? What have I missed?
He is cool and edgy so we will praise him at all costs. On twitter, Safin even was declared the highest peak level at US Open EVER, lol! 80% of voters probably didn’t even watch that match against Sapmras, they just know it’s SaFiN.
Nolucky Djluckyvic is a finished player and here's WHY
1) Threatens to leave the tour if he has to quarantine
2) Ghosts in big games and relies on opponents weak mentality
3) Lost 6-0 twice to Nadal
4)Mickey mouse Grand Slams and No.1
5)Fake Injury
Not top 600 in my book
Totally shameful loss, that one to Safin. The same Safin who went onto to beat peak Federer a few rounds later.
Pummeling Fed 12-1 in sets in the 4 victories he had over him makes up for those lossesYeah. As great as Djokovic’s achievements are at AO, we should not forget shameful losses to Istomin, Chung, Tsonga, Safin (while being bageled, too), and even... *******!
Big shadow on the supposed tournament’s GOAT.
Safin beat a 9 time and a 6 time champ in the same tournamentAnd it was a peak 16 year old Novak, getting destroyed like that. Not sure how anyone can call this guy the AO GOAT.
And it was a peak 16 year old Novak, getting destroyed like that. Not sure how anyone can call this guy the AO GOAT.
Safin beat a 9 time and a 6 time champ in the same tournament
he beat wawrinka in qualifyingIn his very first slam, right?
In his very first slam, right?
Funny to see a person who hypes 2015 Nadal, yet brings down Djokovic.And it was a peak 16 year old Novak, getting destroyed like that. Not sure how anyone can call this guy the AO GOAT.
The court looks slower than it was this year
How you like that crispness?
Yeah. As great as Djokovic’s achievements are at AO, we should not forget shameful losses to Istomin, Chung, Tsonga, Safin (while being bageled, too), and even... *******!
Big shadow on the supposed tournament’s GOAT.
You really gonna count Safin?Yeah. As great as Djokovic’s achievements are at AO, we should not forget shameful losses to Istomin, Chung, Tsonga, Safin (while being bageled, too), and even... *******!
Big shadow on the supposed tournament’s GOAT.
Djokovic won just 3 games in this match.You really gonna count Safin?
It wasn't.The court looks slower than it was this year
I thought Djokovic was finished after that Ceccinato loss. A month later he, IMO, unexpectedly wins Wimby.So weird that Istomin did it of all people. Istomin, Querrey and Ceccinato are such random losses.
It was his first GS lol. He was 17.Djokovic won just 3 games in this match.
This does make me believe in the rigging of draws more and more.I remember reading about Istomin's backstory when he was drawn to play Federer in the 1st round of the 2006 AO. I was a big admirer of him for his doggedness and recovery from his serious car crash as a junior player, with him suffering serious leg injuries and not picking up a racket for 2 years. Doctors feared he would never play again and he was considering quitting, with his mother encouraging him to keep at it. The fact that he established a pro career in the first place was an excellent achievement, and I was delighted for him when he won his first ATP title in 2015.
On a side note, Seppi vs. Istomin at the majors was certainly an epic rivalry:
2012 Wimbledon 1st round: Istomin def. Seppi 6-7(2) 6-4 3-6 6-3 8-6
2013 Australian Open 2nd round: Seppi def. Istomin 7-6(4) 5-7 6-7(3) 7-6(3) 6-2
2013 Wimbledon 1st round: Seppi def. Istomin 7-6(6) 7-6(3) 5-7 3-6 6-3
2013 US Open 3rd round: Istomin def. Seppi 6-3 6-4 2-6 3-6 6-1
2015 Australian Open 1st round: Seppi def. Istomin 5-7 6-3 2-6 6-1 6-4
If 2015 Nadal was peak then 2005 Djokovic was too. No excuses here. When Nadal played his first RG he won the title, not won 3 games in the first round.It was his first GS lol. He was 17.
I think it's pretty obvious it was. At the very least the bounce was higher. Compare the Istomin match to this match this yearIt wasn't.
I never said 2015 Nadal was peak.If 2015 Nadal was peak then 2005 Djokovic was too. No excuses here. When Nadal played his first RG he won the title, not won 3 games in the first round.
In 2015 Nadal was 14 time Slam Champ, and 9 time FO champion. 2005 AO was Djokovic's first Slam appearance. Definitely not the same.If 2015 Nadal was peak then 2005 Djokovic was too. No excuses here. When Nadal played his first RG he won the title, not won 3 games in the first round.
Well, this thread was made as a response to Djokovic fans once again bringing their usual BS about peak 2015 Nadal. Which is why @Yugram mentioned AO 2005 too.I never said 2015 Nadal was peak.
And when Nadal played his first RG it wasn't his first slam and he was 19 years old by then. Djokovic was 17.
Both are ridiculous. However, 2015 Nadal is still a better tennis player than 2005 Djokovic.Well, this thread was made as a response to Djokovic fans once again bringing their usual BS about peak 2015 Nadal. Which is why @Yugram mentioned AO 2005 too.
It's interesting that such a match-up as Seppi-Istomin can produce so many good matches. I've actually seen them play live and it was an entertaining three-set tussle, with Istomin taking the match in a third set tiebreak, but I didn't know they had a history at the time.I remember reading about Istomin's backstory when he was drawn to play Federer in the 1st round of the 2006 AO. I was a big admirer of him for his doggedness and recovery from his serious car crash as a junior player, with him suffering serious leg injuries and not picking up a racket for 2 years. Doctors feared he would never play again and he was considering quitting, with his mother encouraging him to keep at it. The fact that he established a pro career in the first place was an excellent achievement, and I was delighted for him when he won his first ATP title in 2015.
On a side note, Seppi vs. Istomin at the majors was certainly an epic rivalry:
2012 Wimbledon 1st round: Istomin def. Seppi 6-7(2) 6-4 3-6 6-3 8-6
2013 Australian Open 2nd round: Seppi def. Istomin 7-6(4) 5-7 6-7(3) 7-6(3) 6-2
2013 Wimbledon 1st round: Seppi def. Istomin 7-6(6) 7-6(3) 5-7 3-6 6-3
2013 US Open 3rd round: Istomin def. Seppi 6-3 6-4 2-6 3-6 6-1
2015 Australian Open 1st round: Seppi def. Istomin 5-7 6-3 2-6 6-1 6-4
lmaoDare say this victory was actually more important, historical than winning the title.
Federer needs to thank Istomin for that title.lmao