Titles since all Big3 played

[Lew II]

Slam titles since all Big3 played their first Slam (2005 AO):

Nadal 19
Djokovic 17
Federer 16

YEC titles since all Big3 played their first YEC (2007):

Djokovic 5
Federer 3
Nadal 0

Masters titles since all Big3 played their first Masters (2005 Cincinnati):

Djokovic 34
Nadal 32
Federer 21

ATP titles since all Big3 played their first ATP tournament (2004 Umag):

Federer 86
Nadal 85
Djokovic 79

 

[RS]

What a era. Djokovic and Nadal have edged it though over Federer since AO 05. I think the distance will grow as well unless Federer finds 2017 like form.....

 

[Lew II]

#1 weeks since all Big3 were #1 (4 july 2011):

Djokovic 280
Nadal 107
Federer 25

 

[junior74]

 

[PeoplesChamp]

#1 weeks since all Big3 were #1:

Djokovic 280
Nadal 107
Federer 25

Weeks #1 after Fed turned 30:

Djokovic 268

 

[tennisaddict]

Wow, didnt realize Fed was so close even being 6 years older. LMAO at Nadal and Djoker for not shunting out a player 6 years older.

 

[tennisaddict]

Slams won after Fed turned 33 :

Djokovic - 11
Federer - 3
Nadal - 5

 

[vex]

Weeks #1 after Fed turned 30:

Djokovic 268

Fed slams since Djokovic’s prime started (excluding time when Djokovic was injured): 1

 

[Lew II]

Weeks #1 after Fed turned 30:

Djokovic 268

And 6.5 years later Federer was #1.

6.5 years before july 2011 Djokovic's best ranking was #188.

 

[PeoplesChamp]

Fed slams since Djokovic’s prime started (excluding time when Djokovic was injured): 1

Injured lol. That was way more complicated than an injury, but we'll save that. It's too early in the morning where I'm at

 

[NoleFam]

Djokovic and Nadal should hit 40 Masters titles easily if they can maintain their form for another couple of years. That is going to be so hard to be touched by these younger guys coming up.

 

[tennisaddict]

With 10 masters being played every year, I can see someone in future easily getting 50 masters.

 

[PeoplesChamp]

Fed slams since Djokovic’s prime started (excluding time when Djokovic was injured): 1

Almost forgot Vexie boy, Djokovic entered every slam that Fed won 2017/18

Better luck next time.

 

[CYGS]

Wow, didnt realize Fed was so close even being 6 years older. LMAO at Nadal and Djoker for not shunting out a player 6 years older.

Despite a six years advantage you mean.

 

[CYGS]

#1 weeks since all Big3 were #1 (4 july 2011):

Djokovic 280
Nadal 107
Federer 25

Shows how weak the field was before Djokodal emerged.

 

[vex]

Almost forgot Vexie boy, Djokovic entered every slam that Fed won 2017/18

Better luck next time.

“Entered” lol. Stay in denial land I guess

 

[JaoSousa]

Slam titles since all Big3 played their first Slam (2005 AO):

Nadal 19
Djokovic 17
Federer 16

YEC titles since all Big3 played their first YEC (2007):

Djokovic 5
Federer 3
Nadal 0

Masters titles since all Big3 played their first Masters (2005 Cincinnati):

Djokovic 34
Nadal 32
Federer 21

ATP titles since all Big3 played their first ATP tournament (2004 Umag):

Federer 86
Nadal 85
Djokovic 79

Honestly, what is the point of this post. Obviously if you take out a very significant chunk out of Federer's career and Nadal's as well, the numbers will suit you. Because Federer started to play first, and then Nadal, you are taking away some of what they achieved before Djokovic. There is zero meaning in these numbers.

 

[The Guru]

With 10 masters being played every year, I can see someone in future easily getting 50 masters.

Agreed. I don't think their masters record stands for too long.

 

[Lew II]

Honestly, what is the point of this post. Obviously if you take out a very significant chunk out of Federer's career and Nadal's as well, the numbers will suit you. Because Federer started to play first, and then Nadal, you are taking away some of what they achieved before Djokovic. There is zero meaning in these numbers.

The meaning is that Federer won a lot in a weaker era when other Big3 were not playing yet. And of course no other of this level was around, as Sampras retired in 2002.

 

[MeatTornado]

The meaning is that Federer won a lot in a weaker era when other Big3 were not playing yet. And of course no other of this level was around, as Sampras retired in 2002.

Wow, so Fed's peak didn't overlap with the Djokodal Era? This is surely news to all of us. SO glad you made a thread about it. It must be the first one you or anyone else has ever made about it.

On behalf of everyone at TTW, thank you.

 

[KINGROGER]

The meaning is that Federer won a lot in a weaker era when other Big3 were not playing yet. And of course no other of this level was around, as Sampras retired in 2002.

Djokovic won a lot of titles and slams with no other prime ATG around. 11/17 slams and counting post Fedal prime.

 

[Lew II]

Djokovic won a lot of titles and slams with no other prime ATG around. 11/17 slams and counting post Fedal prime.

2017-19 Nadal not prime? LOL

Prime is opinion. Entering the tournament is objective.

 

[MichaelNadal]

Wow, didnt realize Fed was so close even being 6 years older. LMAO at Nadal and Djoker for not shunting out a player 6 years older.

Don't be insecure man. Fed is GOATY af. Nadal and Djokovic's stats will start to slide as they age too.

 

[Breakpointerer]

Honestly, what is the point of this post. Obviously if you take out a very significant chunk out of Federer's career and Nadal's as well, the numbers will suit you. Because Federer started to play first, and then Nadal, you are taking away some of what they achieved before Djokovic. There is zero meaning in these numbers.

If there's one thing Lew is good at, it's cherry picking.

 

[uscwang]

Slam titles since all Big3 played their first Slam (2005 AO):

Nadal 19
Djokovic 17
Federer 16

YEC titles since all Big3 played their first YEC (2007):

Djokovic 5
Federer 3
Nadal 0

Masters titles since all Big3 played their first Masters (2005 Cincinnati):

Djokovic 34
Nadal 32
Federer 21

ATP titles since all Big3 played their first ATP tournament (2004 Umag):

Federer 86
Nadal 85
Djokovic 79

How about just look at the period since 2005 AO, when all 3 came to the GS stage, Federer 23 y.o., Nadal 18 y.o., Novak 17 y.o.?

 

[Bender]

With 10 masters being played every year, I can see someone in future easily getting 50 masters.

Doubt it'd be "easy".

Nadal was practically a lock for every clay M1000 title for close to a decade and yet has only managed to win just under 3/4 of that.

Unless someone in the future becomes king of hards to the same degree that Nadal is the king on clay, I don't see someone reaching 50 too soon.

 

[KINGROGER]

2017-19 Nadal not prime? LOL

Prime is opinion. Entering the tournament is objective.

Weaker era is opinion, no younger atg challengers for 10 years now is a fact.

 

[ForehandRF]

Wow, so Fed's peak didn't overlap with the Djokodal Era? This is surely news to all of us. SO glad you made a thread about it. It must be the first one you or anyone else has ever made about it.

On behalf of everyone at TTW, thank you.

All is seen through Nadal and Djokovic lenses, as if only they matter and anybody else is just weak competition.

 

[Lew II]

How about just look at the period since 2005 AO, when all 3 came to the GS stage, Federer 23 y.o., Nadal 18 y.o., Novak 17 y.o.?

Slams: Nadal 19, Djokovic 17, Federer 16
yec: Djokovic 5, Federer 4, Nadal 0
masters: Nadal 35, Djokovic 34, Federer 24
titles: Nadal 84, Federer 81, Djokovic 79
#1 weeks: Djokovic 280, Federer 263, Nadal 209

 

[uscwang]

Slams: Nadal 19, Djokovic 17, Federer 16
yec: Djokovic 5, Federer 4, Nadal 0
masters: Nadal 35, Djokovic 34, Federer 24
titles: Nadal 84, Federer 81, Djokovic 79
#1 weeks: Djokovic 280, Federer 263, Nadal 209

This makes a lot of sense. Except for a head start, mainly achievements made in 2004, Federer has nothing over Nadal and Novak. He will likely fall to the 3rd place eventually.
As surreal as it may sound, the coronavirus might cause multiple majors cancelled in this critical year and change the race outcome.

 

[vex]

This makes a lot of sense. Except for a head start, mainly achievements made in 2004, Federer has nothing over Nadal and Novak. He will likely fall to the 3rd place eventually.
As surreal as it may sound, the coronavirus might cause multiple majors cancelled in this critical year and change the race outcome.

Highly doubt Corona will have that impact. But if Rafa wins RG and Djoker wins W/USO, it’s a lock for Fed 3rd all time

 

[tennis_pro]

Total number of Slams:
1) Federer - 20
and the rest

 

[vex]

Total number of Slams:
1) Federer - 20
and the rest

Make sure u get some mileage out of this one in its final 3 months

 

[tennis_pro]

Make sure u get some mileage out of this one in its final 3 months

You mean some Slams will finally get deducted from Nadal's total?

 

[tennisaddict]

Doubt it'd be "easy".

Nadal was practically a lock for every clay M1000 title for close to a decade and yet has only managed to win just under 3/4 of that.

Unless someone in the future becomes king of hards to the same degree that Nadal is the king on clay, I don't see someone reaching 50 too soon.

It will be easy for the next ATG. Not many times you are going to have a guy mopping all clay and finding it hard to get HC and vice versa.

 

[RelentlessAttack]

Slam count prior to weak era (defined as 2014-present):

Federer 17
Nadal 13
Djokovic 7

Note that Djokovic didn't win the FO prior to the weak era so he is also lacking a career grand slam.

Honestly, what is the point of this post. Obviously if you take out a very significant chunk out of Federer's career and Nadal's as well, the numbers will suit you. Because Federer started to play first, and then Nadal, you are taking away some of what they achieved before Djokovic. There is zero meaning in these numbers.

Just trolling.

 

[RelentlessAttack]

This makes a lot of sense. Except for a head start, mainly achievements made in 2004, Federer has nothing over Nadal and Novak. He will likely fall to the 3rd place eventually.
As surreal as it may sound, the coronavirus might cause multiple majors cancelled in this critical year and change the race outcome.

No majors will be cancelled.