Topspin Shot
Legend
Hey, I've lost at the park too.
Then again, I've demonstrated on here that I can play unlike some posters. :wink:
Why did Federer stick with a 90 square inch for so long?
- Thread starter rb120134
- Start date
Hey, I've lost at the park too.
Then again, I've demonstrated on here that I can play unlike some posters. :wink:
SoBad
G.O.A.T.
He couldn't beat Nadal in slams, so he needed an excuse, like player stick.
Povl Carstensen
Legend
You brought up Agassi, not I.Then what does Agassi have anything to do with me beating guys using 100-110 with my 85-90?
BreakPoint
Bionic Poster
Um..no, you did. What does Agassi have anything to do with me winning with my 85-90?
Did you think I play against Agassi on a regular basis? If so, you were badly mistaken.RanchDressing
Hall of Fame
"My anecdotal experience is better than your anecdotal experience. Also my opinion is correct while yours isn't. I've played tennis 10 thousand years, and I'm probably as good as federer on a good day, so I know what he's thinking."
"No your anecdotal experience is based off of nothing. You're wrong, and your opinion is wrong, while mine is correct. You're not as good as federer, but I am, and I know what he's thinking"
/Thread
"No your anecdotal experience is based off of nothing. You're wrong, and your opinion is wrong, while mine is correct. You're not as good as federer, but I am, and I know what he's thinking"
/Thread
Rock Strongo
Legend
Oh God, not this again.
Combination of improved competition in power and consistency categories with slower hard courts.
Also, notice major drop in drop shots from Roger with amplified net approach.
Increased necessity of winning key points with more power and net approach instead of his custom ingenious point creation required move to a bigger frame.
Also, notice major drop in drop shots from Roger with amplified net approach.
Increased necessity of winning key points with more power and net approach instead of his custom ingenious point creation required move to a bigger frame.
Povl Carstensen
Legend
BreakPoint
Bionic Poster
So what does Sampras playing against Agassi have anything at all with me playing against guys at my local park?
You asked me if Agassi was the one I was winning against with my comment, which you quoted with your question. Did you really you think Agassi plays down at my local park and that is who I play against? If so, you must think I play on the same level of Sampras. :shock:
Last edited:
Povl Carstensen
Legend
Anyway, you brought up Agassi in the discussion. My point being that you could probably lose to a guy using a bigger racket than you.
coolschreiber
Hall of Fame
Another thread down the toilet
Smasher08
Legend
This is why NoPoint is the only poaster on my ignore list.
One click, and all that Asperger-y drivel went bye-bye.
LapsedNoob
Professional
We should start a club.
BreakPoint
Bionic Poster
Talk about "NoPoint". Yeah, I would lose to Agassi even if he used a ping pong paddle. Nothing to do with the size of the racquet.
And, no, I did not bring up Agassi in the discussion/response about my tennis. You did. Everyone else seems to be able to follow the thread just fine except you.
Povl Carstensen
Legend
Exactly my point.
Your point stands in almost of any case. Buuuuut not in Roger's case.
I had read Roger is very hard headed and does not like to change anything. So I think that may have been the reason he stayed with the 90 sq in version for so long. Then he started losing more often than he was use to so perhaps he thought something needed to change- thus the racquet switch.
