Definitely, everyone is different, some people like chocolate and some people like vanilla, one isn't better.
You couldn't be more wrong.
Definitely, everyone is different, some people like chocolate and some people like vanilla, one isn't better.
You couldn't be more wrong.
You couldn't be more wrong.
I've played league tennis almost 40 years now. USTA 4.0, USTA 4.5 and one year USTA 5.0 many decades ago. Also, play ALTA from B3 to AA3 men's and mixed. And, about a decade of singles on the Ultimate tennis league - 4.0 to 4.5. I still enjoy league play, Yes, you do get "those people". The ones that seem to make bad calls more frequently than occasionally missing a call, or the sandbaggers who are playing down 1 or 2 levels to win a cheap trophy and bragging rights, or the captains who stack line-ups, or the drama between teammates (I should be playing instead of so and so). But, I still find 90+% of the people are reasonable adults and the matches are still fun. I like competing as a team, playing new people and at new locations. I also like hanging around after a match and having a beverage and sandwich on a nice day. I actually love playing tennis in a league 90% of the time and that's enough to tolerate those people. God, I hope I am never one of those people.
Rocky-Road, with no hesitation--diversity rules--black and white together with a lot of nutz mixed in.Easy now.....which way are you leaning.....chocolate or vanilla? Your answer could decide the fate of the world.......
Rocky-Road, with no hesitation--diversity rules--black and white together with a lot of nutz mixed in.
I know, I know, a strange topic to post in the Adult League and Tournament Talk Forum, but hear me out.....
As I wrote in another posting on a different thread, I have played tennis my whole life, amongst other sports. I played one year Division 3 tennis on a pretty good team, but mostly rode the pine. I am an average player pretty much, most likely because I am an average athlete. However, when you have played tennis long enough, your game eventually develops to the point where one is comfortable playing against all different levels. I will make as many bum headed mistakes against a 3.5 player as I will against a Division 1 college player. Pace, variety of shot, spins, accuracy, etc., etc., in my time playing I have seen it all. A college kid would wipe the court with me, but I wouldn't look out of place out there to a casual observer just walking by, the score on the other hand would be more indicative of the truth.
About 14 years ago (can't believe it has been that long) after a move from Florida, I discovered league tennis with a friend of mine that I had been playing with. At this point in my life, I hadn't played tennis but maybe 2 or 3 times over a 5 or 6 year period. Living in Florida I played a ton of basketball and softball, and though I knew tennis players, I was too busy with other stuff to care about playing.
But now, in my new home town, I was back into playing, and many old friends were as well. So we joined the USTA, found the local league and dove in. I was all in, it was a ton of fun, and I was playing on multiple teams, multiple time per week.
My observation about league tennis at the time was that for the most part, the majority of people played fairly and competitively with an eye toward fun and recreation. Yup, there were some bad seeds, both individual players and team captains who really skirted the rules, but in general it was pretty good.
The leagues were also competitively fun, typically having 10 to 16 teams (some seasons we would have multiple divisions there were so many teams), complete with playoffs with the winners advancing on to districts, etc. etc. Forfeits were at a minimum, and most matches were pretty close.
Then either I got more league experience and noticed things I hadn't before or things began to change . Questionable teams, with a bunch of self rated players, or a bunch of players who had appealed began to increase in number. They would roll everyone. Ok, at least I got to play against some very good players a couple of times per season. Then I started noticing poorer and poorer sportsmanship, questionable calls, questionable tactics, bordering on breaking the hindrance rule, etc. Still, the majority of people had good intentions.
Around this time my core team broke up, a bunch of us got bumped, my friends moved away/got injured, I got injured (cupla knee surgeries from soccer), and I didn't have a "main" team that I was always guaranteed to play on (still, plenty of other teams to play on in the area.)
In addition, the USTA introduced age groups into league play, next the USTA introduced combo leagues, and then the "tiered leagues (where you have 4.5 at first doubles, then 4.0 at second and 3.5 at third, not sure what this is called), I think at one point they introduce mixed species leagues where you could play with your pet, etc., etc., etc...
I started to notice that my positive league experiences, which well outnumbered my negative ones, were now on balance, almost equal with my negative experiences. An arms race had begun, once one team started doing questionable things to win, others followed suit, it left a bad taste in my mouth when I ended up on one of these teams. Tennis drama, where adults started acting like high school kids with clicks, recruiting players off of other teams and cutting players, their friends, from their team. More and more questionable behavior came into play in deciding matches on the court.
These experiences started leading me to question whether I wanted to continue in league tennis. During this time we had created a group of friends who had reserved court time weekly. There was 9 of us splitting the court, playing doubles. I kept a spreadsheet with scores and calculated winning percentages for each player, thus creating standings. We would have beers afterward, and even had a "playoff" and "end of season" party and bought a trophy for the winner (a monkey that when switched on would clap cymbals together.)
The play of this group was extremely competitive, and generally of a high caliber, simply because we got to know each other so well. Familiarity breeds quality of play. It was much more fun for me than USTA league play and made me question league tennis that much more.
By this time the men's league, which once was 16 teams was now 9, with at least one or two forfeits per season, many less matches, and much less a sense of team. Quality of play was all over the map, captains were always scurrying to find players. Then, it finally dawned on me. USTA leagues were over saturated. There were too many of them. Active players, who at one time, were playing on 3 or 4 teams during a season, were playing on 8, 10, 12 even in one season. Their captains were busy competing with the player's other teams to get a line-up. This, it turns out, was finally my tipping point. I did the math, I realized it was no longer worth it.
I could put up with the questionable sportsmanship, the sandbagging, the politicking within and between teams, even the occasional player/partner drama, but I really feel the USTA, in either their misguided attempt to create a league for everyone, or simply to increase revenue (not sure what the math is, but I wonder how much they collect in those league fees with the increase of league options, I would think it adds up) was the proverbial straw that broke the camels back.
Once the quality of the league itself went down, once you added that in, the scales tipped. The outside group I played with represented everything I had come to love about league tennis in the early days when I first started playing. Good sportsmanship, really competitive, high quality tennis. Sure, we will argue occasionally, but we will still share beers afterward.
I have taken another long break from tennis due to some injuries and life changes. I am about to start playing again, but I wonder, will I go back to leagues, have they changed, are they the same, are they worse?
I have been very fortunate playing tennis as an adult. I am at the age where my body probably won't allow me to play basketball, soccer or baseball/softball anymore, but I can still play tennis. I have never had a problem finding people to play with, and I live in an area where there are a number of districts close to one another, so there are a lot of league options. But I wonder, given the option, if I am just better off playing with friends then with the USTA leagues I used to love.
I know, I know, a strange topic to post in the Adult League and Tournament Talk Forum, but hear me out.....
As I wrote in another posting on a different thread, I have played tennis my whole life, amongst other sports. I played one year Division 3 tennis on a pretty good team, but mostly rode the pine. I am an average player pretty much, most likely because I am an average athlete. However, when you have played tennis long enough, your game eventually develops to the point where one is comfortable playing against all different levels. I will make as many bum headed mistakes against a 3.5 player as I will against a Division 1 college player. Pace, variety of shot, spins, accuracy, etc., etc., in my time playing I have seen it all. A college kid would wipe the court with me, but I wouldn't look out of place out there to a casual observer just walking by, the score on the other hand would be more indicative of the truth.
About 14 years ago (can't believe it has been that long) after a move from Florida, I discovered league tennis with a friend of mine that I had been playing with. At this point in my life, I hadn't played tennis but maybe 2 or 3 times over a 5 or 6 year period. Living in Florida I played a ton of basketball and softball, and though I knew tennis players, I was too busy with other stuff to care about playing.
But now, in my new home town, I was back into playing, and many old friends were as well. So we joined the USTA, found the local league and dove in. I was all in, it was a ton of fun, and I was playing on multiple teams, multiple time per week.
My observation about league tennis at the time was that for the most part, the majority of people played fairly and competitively with an eye toward fun and recreation. Yup, there were some bad seeds, both individual players and team captains who really skirted the rules, but in general it was pretty good.
The leagues were also competitively fun, typically having 10 to 16 teams (some seasons we would have multiple divisions there were so many teams), complete with playoffs with the winners advancing on to districts, etc. etc. Forfeits were at a minimum, and most matches were pretty close.
Then either I got more league experience and noticed things I hadn't before or things began to change . Questionable teams, with a bunch of self rated players, or a bunch of players who had appealed began to increase in number. They would roll everyone. Ok, at least I got to play against some very good players a couple of times per season. Then I started noticing poorer and poorer sportsmanship, questionable calls, questionable tactics, bordering on breaking the hindrance rule, etc. Still, the majority of people had good intentions.
Around this time my core team broke up, a bunch of us got bumped, my friends moved away/got injured, I got injured (cupla knee surgeries from soccer), and I didn't have a "main" team that I was always guaranteed to play on (still, plenty of other teams to play on in the area.)
In addition, the USTA introduced age groups into league play, next the USTA introduced combo leagues, and then the "tiered leagues (where you have 4.5 at first doubles, then 4.0 at second and 3.5 at third, not sure what this is called), I think at one point they introduce mixed species leagues where you could play with your pet, etc., etc., etc...
I started to notice that my positive league experiences, which well outnumbered my negative ones, were now on balance, almost equal with my negative experiences. An arms race had begun, once one team started doing questionable things to win, others followed suit, it left a bad taste in my mouth when I ended up on one of these teams. Tennis drama, where adults started acting like high school kids with clicks, recruiting players off of other teams and cutting players, their friends, from their team. More and more questionable behavior came into play in deciding matches on the court.
These experiences started leading me to question whether I wanted to continue in league tennis. During this time we had created a group of friends who had reserved court time weekly. There was 9 of us splitting the court, playing doubles. I kept a spreadsheet with scores and calculated winning percentages for each player, thus creating standings. We would have beers afterward, and even had a "playoff" and "end of season" party and bought a trophy for the winner (a monkey that when switched on would clap cymbals together.)
The play of this group was extremely competitive, and generally of a high caliber, simply because we got to know each other so well. Familiarity breeds quality of play. It was much more fun for me than USTA league play and made me question league tennis that much more.
By this time the men's league, which once was 16 teams was now 9, with at least one or two forfeits per season, many less matches, and much less a sense of team. Quality of play was all over the map, captains were always scurrying to find players. Then, it finally dawned on me. USTA leagues were over saturated. There were too many of them. Active players, who at one time, were playing on 3 or 4 teams during a season, were playing on 8, 10, 12 even in one season. Their captains were busy competing with the player's other teams to get a line-up. This, it turns out, was finally my tipping point. I did the math, I realized it was no longer worth it.
I could put up with the questionable sportsmanship, the sandbagging, the politicking within and between teams, even the occasional player/partner drama, but I really feel the USTA, in either their misguided attempt to create a league for everyone, or simply to increase revenue (not sure what the math is, but I wonder how much they collect in those league fees with the increase of league options, I would think it adds up) was the proverbial straw that broke the camels back.
Once the quality of the league itself went down, once you added that in, the scales tipped. The outside group I played with represented everything I had come to love about league tennis in the early days when I first started playing. Good sportsmanship, really competitive, high quality tennis. Sure, we will argue occasionally, but we will still share beers afterward.
I have taken another long break from tennis due to some injuries and life changes. I am about to start playing again, but I wonder, will I go back to leagues, have they changed, are they the same, are they worse?
I have been very fortunate playing tennis as an adult. I am at the age where my body probably won't allow me to play basketball, soccer or baseball/softball anymore, but I can still play tennis. I have never had a problem finding people to play with, and I live in an area where there are a number of districts close to one another, so there are a lot of league options. But I wonder, given the option, if I am just better off playing with friends then with the USTA leagues I used to love.
Would you mind explaining this? How do you go from cheating captains to competitive leagues to more tennis players? How does that relationship work?the USTA league is like any business. It needs captains who cheat so it can keep the leagues competitive and get more people interested to pay into the pot.
During winter USTA, our fees everywhere are $20. It's a joke. I get that the clubs have to cover their costs, but I've always felt that should be built in to the cost of playing in the league, rather than passed through to the player. It's one of the reasons that I only play on an as-needed basis.If court fees were $17 I'd not play either. That's a lot. If we move indoors it's $10-12 but that's a rare instance.
.... I only restring when I break strings, club fees, usta fees (turned out I was spending hundreds on stringing per month), and my weekends are now mine.
It's funny how much people dislike leagues but talk about their rating. Also, why try to get better if you are not playing leagues and tournaments? Are you going to practice your serves for a friendly Saturday morning game?
Hundreds per month on stringing? How is that possible?
It's funny how much people dislike leagues but talk about their rating. Also, why try to get better if you are not playing leagues and tournaments? Are you going to practice your serves for a friendly Saturday morning game?
Completely agree. It's the team aspect that keeps me in USTA - I am part of a group similar to what you describe, which makes it a lot of fun.100% agree... being on a team of cool folks that you look forward to hanging out with, is more important to me than anything else.
ironically i'm on a couple teams where i hardly know half the team.
we don't practice together much (save for a couple people)...
so i'ts not really a "team" feel.
the best season(s) i had was when i was on a team which:
a) capt did great write ups after the match
b) team self organized practice/challenge matches regularly
c) everyone stayed after to have a beer or two (ie. the team i'm on now doesn't)
d) people hung out to support the late matches, and people arrived early to support the early matches
e) we had a social end of season party
but that's hard as people's life situation changes (kids, jobs, responsibilities, etc...)
best way to get it (that team culture) is to manage a team yourself,... but that's a heckuvalotta work (i did it for a couple seasons).
Have a friend that hasn't played a match since 2012 but yet keeps paying USTA every year to keep that 5.0 at the end of their name.
Actually computer rated.A self rate 5.0? Weird.
Actually computer rated.
This was an interesting post and thread reading through. I'd say to each their own but in general if you are just playing with friends, local hitting partners etc. and never playing a competitive league or tournament match then you likely are not really improving or getting the true sense of competition. I give in that USTA has done many things that have not made league play better and has even made it worse. That said there is no substitute for true and organized competition.
I play on about 5 leagues per year. Ours are all between May and September unless you advance to sectionals or nationals due to weather. I play about 5 times per week indoors in the colder months but no leagues and only a few tournaments. Costs, well that's another story. USTA annual $40, Leagues - about $35-50 per league for league fee then another $50-75 per team for team fees which includes court costs. I honestly don't mind paying it as I find it to be worth it for the fun and competition. If you have ever been on a really strong team that has been to sectionals or nationals you might realize just how much sense of team there can be. Anyway, just chiming in with some thoughts.
On the question of whether former USTA players care about their rating . . .
Read any of Dr. John E. Sarno's books for a new perspective on pain.I am 56, and it is hard to play enough to improve given joint troubles and injuries.
On the question of whether former USTA players care about their rating . . .
I'm a 4.0C, but I got slaughtered this year, absolutely destroyed. Not competitive at all. I have since quit USTA and am happier playing socially for now (see many prior posts on this subject, so no reason to repeat).
I am actually concerned about my rating, even though I do not intend to play USTA in the near future.
If I remain a 4.0, I will not be able to get on any team. I would have to invest in lessons and practice to get back to the 4.0 level, and I do not see that happening. It is an open question whether I could get back to 4.0 no matter what I did -- I am 56, and it is hard to play enough to improve given joint troubles and injuries.
If I am dropped to 3.5, that would be perfect. I could continue to sit out, but when I returned I could surely get on a 3.5 team playing the way I am playing now.
On the question of whether former USTA players care about their rating . . .
I'm a 4.0C, but I got slaughtered this year, absolutely destroyed. Not competitive at all. I have since quit USTA and am happier playing socially for now (see many prior posts on this subject, so no reason to repeat).
I am actually concerned about my rating, even though I do not intend to play USTA in the near future.
If I remain a 4.0, I will not be able to get on any team. I would have to invest in lessons and practice to get back to the 4.0 level, and I do not see that happening. It is an open question whether I could get back to 4.0 no matter what I did -- I am 56, and it is hard to play enough to improve given joint troubles and injuries.
If I am dropped to 3.5, that would be perfect. I could continue to sit out, but when I returned I could surely get on a 3.5 team playing the way I am playing now.
My area is similar. There are usually around 10 teams in our flight. Maybe 3-4 of them are super competitive and will only take strong players. Then another few are middle of the road club teams and will take a few weaker players (but have to be club members). But then there are usually a couple of teams who are filled with weak players or people playing up, and who will take pretty much anyone who wants to play as long as they are not complete jerks.I guess the leagues in your area are too competitive... around here there's lots of USTA teams which have players playing up, not to mention players that are near the bottom of their rating category. There's usually one or two teams in each flight that are really trying to optimize and pick the best players, but on all the teams I've played on being reliable, showing up when you say you're going to, being a good sport are more likely to get you kept on the team rather than being good for your level.
I have been a captain for little less than a year now in my area, and generally the teams I put together are not winning teams, we are somewhere middle to the bottom of the pack depending on leagues. As I get to know more and more players and establish relations with them, my teams are getting better as well, but it is tough to recruit players when other captains have been around for over five years within the USTA circles.So players at bottom of level have options... but they would need to play on a weak, losing team, and who wants to do that, right?!?
Completely agree, and sounds like you have a good thing going.There is something for everyone in USTA, and I really do like being the underdog
Wow.
This USTA-free life is pretty awesome.
I was invited to sub for a group of ladies who are about my age and level, many of whom are USTA drop-outs. It went well -- they invited me two more times. Then one of the ladies had a bike accident and will be out until next year, so I picked up her dates.
And now they want to know if I can play Monday nights also.
It's weird. I couldn't even win games in USTA this winter. Now I am playing less, but I am playing better.
I think I'm officially burned out from league tennis.
I was playing at districts today and it was a meaningless match as both of our teams were 0-2. We were having a good match and at 7-7 in the third set tiebreak my partner hits a ball a minimum 18 inches in and the opponent calls it out after she hit a weak floater return.
I didn't even have the motivation to even argue with her. I just don't understand cheating especially in a meaningless match.
Did her partner have a sheepish look on his face or wouldn't look you in the eye?