JohnnySpot
New User
Have "better" players in the past than in the present????
For example:
* NFL: Everyone agrees that football players get faster, stronger, tougher, etc
* MLB: Minus the steriods, it is generally accepted that modern players are better conditioned than past players
* NBA: Better dunkers, faster paced game, the list goes on.
* Cycling: records get broken all the time
* Soccer: conditioning has increased quite a bit.
* Hockey: Even the greats agree that the modern game is an improvement over the old game.
* Golf: Further drives, better equipment, stronger players (for the most part)
* MMA: Bigger, badder, more tuned guys fighting in the ring.
BUT for tennis players...
* Tennis: The ONE sport in the WORLD where past players can
- Serve as fast, if not faster than Andy Roddick
- Hit as fast, if not faster than Rafael Nadal or Roger Federer.
- Consistently beat, outlast, outplay, outtouch, outvolley, outmove any current player.
Why do many people SERIOUSLY think this way? dumb dumb dumb. :evil:
For example:
* NFL: Everyone agrees that football players get faster, stronger, tougher, etc
* MLB: Minus the steriods, it is generally accepted that modern players are better conditioned than past players
* NBA: Better dunkers, faster paced game, the list goes on.
* Cycling: records get broken all the time
* Soccer: conditioning has increased quite a bit.
* Hockey: Even the greats agree that the modern game is an improvement over the old game.
* Golf: Further drives, better equipment, stronger players (for the most part)
* MMA: Bigger, badder, more tuned guys fighting in the ring.
BUT for tennis players...
* Tennis: The ONE sport in the WORLD where past players can
- Serve as fast, if not faster than Andy Roddick
- Hit as fast, if not faster than Rafael Nadal or Roger Federer.
- Consistently beat, outlast, outplay, outtouch, outvolley, outmove any current player.
Why do many people SERIOUSLY think this way? dumb dumb dumb. :evil: