Harry_Wild
G.O.A.T.
Ryan Harrison
Jame Blake
Donald Young
Not sure about Bobby Reynolds nor Bobby Ginepri
Jame Blake
Donald Young
Not sure about Bobby Reynolds nor Bobby Ginepri
Ryan Harrison
Jame Blake
Donald Young
Not sure about Bobby Reynolds nor Bobby Ginepri
Wild Cards:
Ryan Harrison(USA)
Steve Johnson(USA)
Robby Ginepri(USA)
Donald Young(USA)
Marinko Matosevic(AUS)
Jack Sock(USA)
Bobby Reynolds(USA)
Wild Cards:
Ryan Harrison(USA)
Steve Johnson(USA)
Robby Ginepri(USA)
Donald Young(USA)
Marinko Matosevic(AUS)
Jack Sock(USA)
Bobby Reynolds(USA)
That isn't biased at all
Ryan Harrison
Jame Blake
Donald Young
Not sure about Bobby Reynolds nor Bobby Ginepri
Why do they keep giving Donald anything?
I know this won't ever happen, but slams shouldn't be allowed to give wild cards to local players.
He's top 100. Got to the semi's of Legg Mason. Beat Murray earlier in the year.
He deserves it this year.
Wild Cards:
Ryan Harrison(USA)
Steve Johnson(USA)
Robby Ginepri(USA)
Donald Young(USA)
Marinko Matosevic(AUS)
Jack Sock(USA)
Bobby Reynolds(USA)
Why? Slams should be able to give their wild card to whomever they want. Of course they would want to give their own players a chance. Did anyone else(perhaps more deserving) even apply for a wildcard?
Why do they keep giving Donald anything?
That's why it's called the U.S. Open. If they had a major called Serbian Open or WimbleChina it would be even worse. Even teaching pros and 4.0 players (with heavy financial and political influence) would get WC's. :wink:
He won't quickly return to the 100s. This is not a matter of opinion. If he loses every match he plays, he will not return to the 100s until, at the very soonest, after the AO in 2012.
I think players like Young/Blake are those who are most deserving of WC, those who are ranked high enough for the main draw but weren't at the entry deadline.
Johnson, Sock, Ginepri, Harrison, Blake, Young all got WC's.
Doesn't sound very fair to me. Tennis is an international sport with people from all over the world competing, thus there should be equal chances for everyone. The US can be very happy to have one of the 4 most important tournaments in their country, but they shouldn't take advantage of it...Wild Cards:
Ryan Harrison(USA)
Steve Johnson(USA)
Robby Ginepri(USA)
Donald Young(USA)
Marinko Matosevic(AUS)
Jack Sock(USA)
Bobby Reynolds(USA)
Doesn't sound very fair to me. Tennis is an international sport with people from all over the world competing, thus there should be equal chances for everyone. The US can be very happy to have one of the 4 most important tournaments in their country, but they shouldn't take advantage of it...
However, I don't know if there are other players who would have deserved a wild card more than these guys.
This is only the list of players with wild card entrance. Nothing else. No comments.
Serbia and China has nothing to do with this.
No need to be angry. Relax.
It is quite a heavy American list there but most tournaments do it, I know Wimbledon a couple o f years ago started to spread theirs around more, for a while some of the majors used to have a reciprical deal going where they'd let the others nominate someone for a wildcard, not sure that happens anymore.(certainly don't think it was anything official)
But it's their tournament and they have to do what they think will put the most bums on seats in the early rounds, i'd imagine a bunch of Americans on the outside courts will help that.
Doesn't sound very fair to me. Tennis is an international sport with people from all over the world competing, thus there should be equal chances for everyone. The US can be very happy to have one of the 4 most important tournaments in their country, but they shouldn't take advantage of it...
However, I don't know if there are other players who would have deserved a wild card more than these guys.
If tournaments didn't give wild cards then there will be only 1 british player at wimbledon and 0 at aussie open.
I don't see how someone being in their 7th year has anything to do with it. A player isn't more or less deserving because of their age: they are so because of their accomplishments.
The problem is ranking points (undeserved) which they get with wild card.
For example: Johnson is 525 on ranking list, and will get 10 points in first round.
Instead of 55 point (he has now), he will have 65, and he will be at 493 position on ranking list. He will improve his ranking position for 32 places without any contribution from his side (with chance to get award, like most improved player in a year).
Ginepri: 115 points, 363 rankings. After wild card, 125 points, 345 rankings, etc.
Bogomolov(USA) - Johnson(USA)
Roddick(USA) - Russel(USA)
Two American will be in second round - chance 100%
Whats happen if, for example Johnson win only one mach against compatriot?
He will have 100 points, and ranking place392.
So he need only one win to change ranking place for 133 places: 525-392.
Players at 206, 363, 525 place on ranking list don't deserved wild card.
They got it. and it is OK, but they don't deserved it.
Please tell me one thing DY has "accomplished".
There is A LOT of ignorance in this thread! OMG
And your point is? 'Fair' is a 4 letter word. Funny you call the US out, but not the French, Aussies, or Brits.Doesn't sound very fair to me.
True. Tomic bailed on the AU qualifying (faked illness) and they still gave him a WC.If tournaments didn't give wild cards then there will be only 1 british player at wimbledon and 0 at aussie open.
Why would Ryan Harrison need a wildcard? He's ranked #66 in the world. He's a direct entry.Wild Cards:
Ryan Harrison(USA)
Steve Johnson(USA)
Robby Ginepri(USA)
Donald Young(USA)
Marinko Matosevic(AUS)
Jack Sock(USA)
Bobby Reynolds(USA)
I believe because the cutoff is (6?) weeks out.I think you only need a wildcard or to qualify if you're ranked below #102 or somewhere around there.
Why would Ryan Harrison need a wildcard? He's ranked #66 in the world. He's a direct entry.
And why would Donald Young need a wildcard? He's ranked #84.
I think you only need a wildcard or to qualify if you're ranked below #102 or somewhere around there.
True, after he loses early AGAIN, and quickly returns to the 100's, this should put an end to this.
Wow BP. As long as you've been around here I would've thought you would know the entry rules.
jokinla said:Please tell me one thing DY has "accomplished".
Guess what, DY won his 1st rd match. Bet it's killing you to have to wait at least till the 2nd rd to start back up with your anti DY rants, huh??
He's ranked higher than the ranking cutoff for DA, which was my entire point -- if the deadline were today, he wouldn't even need a WC, which is exactly the kind of player who should get them in my opinion.
Whether you want to judge it on that, main draw ATP wins, etc. he's achieved more than the other options being suggested to give the WC to.
Dude, you gotta stop with the hate. While you're at it, please tell me one thing Denis Kudla has accomplished.
Dude, you gotta stop with the hate. While you're at it, please tell me one thing Denis Kudla has accomplished.
I think 6 weeks out is ridiculous. I mean the draw isn't done until a couple of days before the tournament starts. Why do they have the rankings cut-off 6 weeks ahead? I think 2 weeks ahead should be more than sufficient.Wow BP. As long as you've been around here I would've thought you would know the entry rules. Both Harrison & Young needed WCs because both of their ranking jumps came after the 6 wk entry cutoff deadline.
Oh no, I already congratulated him on beating that lucky loser, yes a guy who didn't qualify for the tournament, but luckily someone pulled out so he got to lose to DY, you da man DY.
And you also avoided answering the question, it's not unfair, since it was posted that he has accomplished something, I just want to know what that was, that isn't hate at all.