Snauwaert Ergonom.......dumbest POS ever.
Imo the perimeter weighting system is simply a case of form taking the lead over function. Weight at 3:00 and 9:00 certainly has a valid purpose, but seems like that could be added internally just as easily.
Wilson just choose the more cosmetically enhanced route to achieve a higher twistweight. I think " perimeter weighting system" creates an appealing phrase, and adds a visual construct for the kind of vague concept of "more stability when you miss the sweetspot out close to 3-9"
Even if it was hollow, just the extra graphite to form the PWS is still added weight. A short strip of lead tape doesn't weigh all that much either, but still makes a difference when put in the right places.
Surprised nobody has mention D30. Get's stiffer when you swing faster, more flexible on touch shots? Yeah right!
Aerogel was another pretty funny one. What's with the power-angle racquets?
O Ports seem to be the only tech that might conceivably make a difference I reckon.
I am with you on this one. The most powerful racquet I have happens to be a midsize racquet with a flex of 51! Oh, did I mention it has about 360 swingweight. Took pretty well care of my tennis elbow and allowed me to hit more winners than ever, and with control.
I see no reason why stiffer frames are ever more popular. No reason to go over 65 RA. It is only good to creat more injuries.
some types of HEAD intelligence series have integral circuit chips in the handle. i think they are so fancy.
The 'intelligence' in head i.prestige rackets is made up of goldish paint detail. There's nothing else to it.
Still a great racket.
I recall Kennex racket with like sand shifting inside the frame so it would change balance/swingweight as you swing? that was annoying, the sound of it I mean.
While the Fisher Magnetic Speed wins the overall prize, I think Head is by far the most reliable performer in this field: Flexpoint, Microgel, Liquidmetal, Youtek, Graphene... You already know it: in 2 years the marketing dept will come up with something new, at least as insulting as the previous material/technologies, while two years ago's WONDER MATERIAL will just disappear from brochures...
Not sure how D3O works, but certain materials require slow, steady pressure to deform elastically, while acting rigid under sudden impact. Think of water impact: if you jump from 1000 feet in a lake you will bounce off as if you'd hit concrete, yet if you jump from 1 foot, you will hardly feel the impact because the water molecules can only move that fast out of your way. So, while not saying that D3O does what it claims, there are materials out there that could do it.
The power angle is just a different stringing pattern. You can string your favorite racket in a diagonal pattern and see if it does anything differently. Some have tried it with a K90. Do a search. My personal take is that the extra spin people experience with the Power Angle is due more to the 16x16 stringing pattern than the diagonal aspect (close string density to 16x15 of the Steam 99s).
The 'intelligence' in head i.prestige rackets is made up of goldish paint detail. There's nothing else to it.
Still a great racket.
I recall Kennex racket with like sand shifting inside the frame so it would change balance/swingweight as you swing? that was annoying, the sound of it I mean.
Surprised nobody has mention D30. Get's stiffer when you swing faster, more flexible on touch shots? Yeah right!
Aerogel was another pretty funny one. What's with the power-angle racquets?
O Ports seem to be the only tech that might conceivably make a difference I reckon.
I have even dipped my fingers into the orange d30 material in my pro shop and tried to imagine it getting harder the more I pressed on it. It may indeed work, but needs to be in sufficient amounts to make a difference, and I am not sure how much of it is there in the frame. Does anybody know?
That when you hit some materials they will go harder the harder you hit is not impossible. There are many materials like that.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RUMX_b_m3Js
The intelligence chips in the i series HEAD frames really are in there. There are several pages devoted to explaining how it works in the Book on Racquet Physics written by Brody, Cross, and Lindsey that was published around the same era. It's actually a pretty simple concept, and not all that complicated when you break it down.
Having said that, feel free to keep your skepticism. Chip or no chip, the iPrestiges are widely accepted as among the very best of the long lineage. They are still great racquets either way. As a long time Prestige user, I can vouch for that as well.
-Jack
But what was the contribution of the chip?
Perfect timing. Almost bought a 13 APD yesterday for the hell of it, the racquet is not for me. I have one handed backhand but all that cortex, and throat design and stuff almost had me departing with 200 bills.
I think the Dunlop 4Ds play better than most sticks out there.
The intelligence chips in the i series HEAD frames really are in there. There are several pages devoted to explaining how it works in the Book on Racquet Physics written by Brody, Cross, and Lindsey that was published around the same era. It's actually a pretty simple concept, and not all that complicated when you break it down.
Having said that, feel free to keep your skepticism. Chip or no chip, the iPrestiges are widely accepted as among the very best of the long lineage. They are still great racquets either way. As a long time Prestige user, I can vouch for that as well.
-Jack
Wait really a chip? I thought it was just a material stripes that generate
electricity with bending. And it will stiffen material that is reactive to electricity.
By the way, I loved the placebo effects of all these technologies.
The intelligence chips in the i series HEAD frames really are in there. There are several pages devoted to explaining how it works in the Book on Racquet Physics written by Brody, Cross, and Lindsey that was published around the same era. It's actually a pretty simple concept, and not all that complicated when you break it down.
Having said that, feel free to keep your skepticism. Chip or no chip, the iPrestiges are widely accepted as among the very best of the long lineage. They are still great racquets either way. As a long time Prestige user, I can vouch for that as well.
-Jack
oh, 'optispot' has to win this
there are some vague, flimsy possibilities that things like flexpoint and aeroskin at least do something, but optispot is just completely stupid...
Surprised nobody has mention D30. Get's stiffer when you swing faster, more flexible on touch shots? Yeah right!
Aerogel was another pretty funny one. What's with the power-angle racquets?
O Ports seem to be the only tech that might conceivably make a difference I reckon.
Dunlop Aeroskin
Aerogel is legit... http://www.aerogel.org/
Ever hit a golf ball that didn't have any dimples?
It supposedly uses the energy during the impact, and stiffens up the throat area for more power.
BS. I used the i.Prestige Mid for half a decade, what power?
All of these technologies and materials are legit, with real world applications.
However, the question is just how much of this stuff is actually in the racquet? We don't know the composition/graphite mixture, for all I know, there could only be 1% of such technology in these frame. Definitely enough to put a sticker on, but how much of an impact does it have?
I play with a Youtek Speed Pro and a Youtek Radical Pro (love high swingweights) and I do can feel the Youtek technology work... soft with touchballs and hard on higher swing speeds.
Am I the only one?
All of these technologies and materials are legit, with real world applications.
However, the question is just how much of this stuff is actually in the racquet? We don't know the composition/graphite mixture, for all I know, there could only be 1% of such technology in these frame. Definitely enough to put a sticker on, but how much of an impact does it have?