Mainad
Bionic Poster
Roger's a Goat not a monkey!
Nikal laude...
He looked like crap last year and still managed to win it.Scoreline for this match was misleading. Seems like Fed annihilated this guy, but he has to up his level if he wants to win this for the 10th time.
Serving nukes out of a tree is an underrated tactic.Opelka didn't get a break point until the last game. Converted it for match point. 6-7 7-6 7-5
Sorry to tell you that m8Berankis plays very solid and has luck too. Stef might get upset here.
Stan pulled out with a back injury.No Fed-Stan match thread!?
The handsome one?The handsome one held his nerve and defeated Zverev. Good job!
Stan pulled out with a back injury.
I caught the 3rd set and like you, I didn't see anything amiss physically with him. He was pumped up and happy to win...Not willing to provide the home crowd with an all-Swiss quarter-final eh? Very disappointing.
Stan has had a very lacklustre history at his country's premier tournament. In 13 appearances in Basel, he has made the semis only twice (2006 l.to Gonzalez, 2011 l.to Federer). He fought hard against Tiafoe earlier on and didn't call the trainer on at any point (as far as I could tell) so I can't help but wonder if this sudden back problem is mainly an excuse to avoid playing Fed?
Not willing to provide the home crowd with an all-Swiss quarter-final eh? Very disappointing.
Stan has had a very lacklustre history at his country's premier tournament. In 13 appearances in Basel, he has made the semis only twice (2006 l.to Gonzalez, 2011 l.to Federer). He fought hard against Tiafoe earlier on and didn't call the trainer on at any point (as far as I could tell) so I can't help but wonder if this sudden back problem is mainly an excuse to avoid playing Fed?
I caught the 3rd set and like you, I didn't see anything amiss physically with him. He was pumped up and happy to win...
They've both said in the past that they don't like playing each other and it's probably even more the case now being in Basel and Federer nearing the end of his career. I wouldn't doubt it at all that this was something like that. In fact, it's the first thing I thought.
I missed that somehow. The last game was a really long one lasting 11-12 mins. My stream cut out for a moment. Maybe that's when it happened. Still, his celebration didn't look like an injured guy celebration and check this out from last year.An informed twitterer said it happened in the final game against Tiafoe.
Maybe this moment?:
I missed that somehow. The last game was a really long one lasting 11-12 mins. My stream cut out for a moment. Maybe that's when it happened. Still, his celebration didn't look like an injured guy celebration and check this out from last year.
https://www.ubitennis.net/2018/10/stan-wawrinka-withdraws-basel-due-back-injury-ends-season/
Maybe it's legit... I dunno.
Those are all good points and I could be wrong, but I think their friendship is why he would do it instead of the other way around. The way I see it is that Federer was going to win anyway. Stan knows it, Roger knows it. It's a way to avoid all the running and time on court for the bigger picture when it comes to both guys. They would never admit it. Normally I wouldn't make this type of assumption btw. Just feel that way this time around.It's very likely to be legit.
I really don't have a reason to doubt Stan. It's not like he has been 50:50 against Fedr on HC, not to mention indoors, to make this seem like he's throwing the match. He's won zero out of 23 matches against Fedr outside of clay, most of them on HC and a few on grass. Also, this is Basel, his home tournament. If his health was not at risk, it stands to reason that he'd show up for the fans, his respect/friendship with Fedr, and take the likely loss, based on their history (tanking or not). He showed up at RG15 and beat Fedr, no? And he fought and beat Fedr to win MC too, even though he was down a set.
Stan pulled out very early for this match, so his condition might be worse than we think (or maybe he's being SUPER cautious bc he's much older now and still wants to play for as long as he can).
Those are all good points and I could be wrong, but I think their friendship is why he would do it instead of the other way around. The way I see it is that Federer was going to win anyway. Stan knows it, Roger knows it. It's a way to avoid all the running and time on court for the bigger picture when it comes to both guys. They would never admit it. Normally I wouldn't make this type of assumption btw. Just feel that way this time around.
it's Federer's faultWawrinka pulls out of the Fed match apparently.
Disapperance fee came through.
This is the second most predictable matchup in tennis after Djokovic-Nishikori. Even if Wawrinka didn't pull out there wouldn't be anything interesting about this match.No Fed-Stan match thread!?
This is a different situation, no?I love all the bs that came out when Djokovic retired vs Wawrinka but now Wawrinka doesn't even step on the court and it's a smart decision.
Yes, evidently. That was Djokovic.This is a different situation, no?
Retiring 3 games from losingYes, evidently. That was Djokovic.
This is Wawrinka.
NahiNikal laude...
Pehli fursat mein nikal...
Do you even know hindi/gujarati??!!Nahi
I know hindi, I'm Indian lolDo you even know hindi/gujarati??!!
Perhaps he didn't want to risk his HtoH?Not willing to provide the home crowd with an all-Swiss quarter-final eh? Very disappointing.
Stan has had a very lacklustre history at his country's premier tournament. In 13 appearances in Basel, he has made the semis only twice (2006 l.to Gonzalez, 2011 l.to Federer). He fought hard against Tiafoe earlier on and didn't call the trainer on at any point (as far as I could tell) so I can't help but wonder if this sudden back problem is mainly an excuse to avoid playing Fed?
Not much to risk though, I mean it's terrible anyway, what's another loss?Perhaps he didn't want to risk his HtoH?
They've both said in the past that they don't like playing each other
That would be an even weaker final opponent than was Chris Lewis in the 1983 Wimbledon final, where losing to John McEnroe.I wish Albot had been Fed's opponent in this year's Wimbledon final.
Winner of Tsitsipas vs KrajinovicWho does federer play next?
The small kid has other ideas thoughWatch replay of Tsitsipas vs. Krajinovic match. Krajinovic takes 1st 6-3! Big win for Krajinovic if he can win the 2nd set!
The handsome one?
Say what you will about Zverev's tennis, but he's easily the best looking player on tour.
The handsome one?
Say what you will about Zverev's tennis, but he's easily the best looking player on tour.
I think it was during Miami Federer said he'd prefer if Stan was never in his section. Sometimes he contradicts it I think because he sort of has to since Wawrinka would never advance if they always avoided each other. A lot of their contests are without emotion. It's the match up I enjoy the least and from what I can tell and read, it's true for them too. Whipping your friend's ass over and over again can get old and strain the friendship after a while. I don't think Federer is selfish enough to enjoy doing it repeatedly.I don't know about Stan but I'm sure there's a quote somewhere from Fed saying the only player he didn't like playing was Marco Chiudinelli. I can't find it again immediately though.
I'd imagine Stan doesn't enjoy playing Fed very much.....
Man, I don't find either Zverev or the Greek remotely attractive. Horses for courses in this case. As they say, taste can't be disputed.