> This is not what I meant. I just find it funny that racket
> manufacturers have to paint rackets that pros use to look like new
> models being released. To me this is deceptive. Obviously the older
> models are no worse than the new models in many cases.
I agree that it is deceptive but my guess is that the vast majority
wouldn't be able to make efficient use of what the pros are using.
One other thing is that players want to use the same frame over a
long period of time while racquet companies want to turn their product
lines over every three years or so. That's one aspect of paintjobs
besides the different specs.
At the local retail store, there are many racquets with pictures of
Federer on them. Same thing with the Williams sisters. It seems that
now one or a few pros can sell multiple frames even though they don't
use the frame (or the paintjob).
> People should be more worried about improving their games than playing
> with rackets that the pros use. The point is racket companies try to
> trick people that pros are playing with their newest models when that
> is not the case.
Well, people can work on improving their game while looking at what the
pros use. If nothing else, playing around with pro frames might be a bit
of fun and it might lead to discovering setups that are more effective
for the non-pro.
> It is just not ethical to me.
What do you think of these ads?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r45tUjJDwnA&feature=relmfu
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbvXURa_M1w&feature=relmfu
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hoJscjaNfDY&feature=relmfu
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1GHMf7gPqE&feature=relmfu
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBTmOMT2he4&feature=BFa&list=SP3578BA59111615F6&index=5
Is it just marketing? It bugs me a little bit but I can imagine some
justifications for it. BTW, I'm still a HEAD customer.
I think that things are cleanest for Federer and Nadal. One uses the
retail frame with some customizations while the other uses an older
retail frame with customizations.