For All I know
New User
How can we all forget about Joe Walsh?
Wes Montgomery
I ranted about the song-writing thing because I thought it was probably something alot of people didn't know about. There are alot of great musicians who are great at marketing: Sting, Yo-Yo-Ma to name a couple.
If you want concrete stuff about his crappy guitar playing than here goes:
He basically relies on a single scale/mode for his soloing, the dorian mode. If you don't know what that is it's derived from the major scale and it is essentially just a minor scale with a raised 6th. It's fine to utilize one scale alot but you better be freakin' creative about how you do it. He isn't. He starts off every solo buy trying to develop a rhythmic motive but because he doesn't have command of the fretboard he always starts in the same register and stays there for quite some time. Then without building any tension whatsoever he starts pumping out all his tried and true licks. Usually deceptively easy hammer-on and pull-off patterns that every beginning guitar player learns in their first few years of playing.
He's been playing like this since the 60's and his playing has gone nowhere because he doesn't care about expanding as a musician he cares about the money.
As I said, his best days were in the 60's, so back then, when he started, his licks weren't yet tired. You're coming at it from a very technical perspective. It's both an advantage and a disadvantage to listen to music as a guitar player. You can catch the stuff that you mentioned, but the downside, is that, focusing so much on the technical aspect, you miss the big picture and what someone is trying to do. Anyway, to each his own.
Your impressions of Jeff Beck then?No, you just don't have the vocabulary to respond. Guitar is what I do for a living and I've studied it very hard for a long time. What that gives me is a larger perspective and the ability to put Santana where he belongs on the spectrum of guitar players. Your right though, to each his own, and to me Santana's playing is uninspired and monotonous.
No, you just don't have the vocabulary to respond. Guitar is what I do for a living and I've studied it very hard for a long time. What that gives me is a larger perspective and the ability to put Santana where he belongs on the spectrum of guitar players. Your right though, to each his own, and to me Santana's playing is uninspired and monotonous.
I half expected that response. Someone who throws around technical terms when discussing music in a non-technical discussion, may be covering for lack of appreciation for said music. There are PLENTY of "professional" guitar players who have praised Santana to the heavens-his technical ability and otherwise. Do they TOO not have your "larger perspective"? I submit that your perspective is more TECHNICAL, but by no means "larger". In fact, it may be narrower.
There's a way to listen to music and then there's a way to listen to music...one way is narrow, technical, professional, and another is not. Neither way is "incorrect"-to each his own, but only an arrogant and insecure little guy would claim that knowing how to play guitar somehow gives him the last word on the subject. It doesn't. Your opinion is not new and has some merit, but neither is it the only opinion on CS. Again, MANY, MANY hotshot guitarists whom, I'm willing to bet, have knowledge of the instrument that would SHAME you, have stated an opposite opinion.
I'm a drummer, by the way, so I'm not totally ignorant of music, as you imply.
Now why didn't you say that before when you were arguing that Santana, having wanked around for the last 30 years (which you admitted), belonged in a discussion about the greatest guitarist of all time. I'm aloud to have a strong opinion about something that I'm very passionate about, and you coxed that out of me by questioning my opinions. You asked me specifically to give my opinion on Santana's playing and I did, in the most logical manner that I could.
Sorry that you got so offended by my opinion.
I ranted about the song-writing thing because I thought it was probably something alot of people didn't know about. There are alot of great musicians who are great at marketing: Sting, Yo-Yo-Ma to name a couple.
If you want concrete stuff about his crappy guitar playing than here goes:
He basically relies on a single scale/mode for his soloing, the dorian mode. If you don't know what that is it's derived from the major scale and it is essentially just a minor scale with a raised 6th. It's fine to utilize one scale alot but you better be freakin' creative about how you do it. He isn't. He starts off every solo buy trying to develop a rhythmic motive but because he doesn't have command of the fretboard he always starts in the same register and stays there for quite some time. Then without building any tension whatsoever he starts pumping out all his tried and true licks. Usually deceptively easy hammer-on and pull-off patterns that every beginning guitar player learns in their first few years of playing.
He's been playing like this since the 60's and his playing has gone nowhere because he doesn't care about expanding as a musician he cares about the money.
No, you just don't have the vocabulary to respond. Guitar is what I do for a living and I've studied it very hard for a long time. What that gives me is a larger perspective and the ability to put Santana where he belongs on the spectrum of guitar players. Your right though, to each his own, and to me Santana's playing is uninspired and monotonous.
Doesn't play well with others...Carlos,I mean.
Actually, the blues scale has more than 5 notes. Yeah, they are pretty similar, as the penetonic lies with the blues scale.Dude you need to come down off your ' high horse' - what the he%l is wrong with playing in the ' Dorian mode', I suppose the Allman bros playing in the mix mode doesn't meet you approval either.
Santana was an innovator, like him or not, and nobody played the guitar like him, he created his own music using that scale. Let me ask you a question - do you think BB King sucks, because he plays in a little five note box ( major penatonic scale) almost exclusively.
I do agree with you that TE rocks, I saw him live and met him after the show, a great player and guy to boot.
Yeah, I agree.... it's all about the "presence" that the player exhibits. Each great guitarists has their own way of broadcasting this aurora. Some players fall into a trance-like state and that emotion ends up being absorbed by the audience. Others greats just play out of their minds, and they don't even need strong facial expressions in order to get the people "into it"; Eric Johnson is an example of one such guitarist.Remember that's *Your* perspective, it's all relative, I also play guitar ( not for a living ) and have played in rock/blues & bluegrass bands< I'm no virtuoso, but as I've grown older I realize it's not about how fast , or how much theory one knows, it's about putting your soul into it and conveying it to the audience.
say wha?I'm not sure I really want to be at that first rehearsal (never mind the first show!) In other words, I have to say it straight amigo - COUNT ME OUT!
No boozin' and womanizin'? You can't do that and be in our band!!!Ross K said:Henceforth, I'm giving up my ramblin' ways. I renounce the bottle and loose woman.
Well, you sure as 'hell' ain't preachin' to the choir here "Rev.", my God-fearin' sensibilites notwithstanding.Ross K said:From now on my only musical involvement shall take place within the confines of my church... YEEES!... I'M GONNA BECOME A PREACHER MAN!... but, with a certain regard and affection for this recent incident, I think I'll go by the name of Preacher Santana...
Actually, the blues scale has more than 5 notes. Yeah, they are pretty similar, as the penetonic lies with the blues scale.
I know what he said... it's just that BB tends to play in the "Blues" scale, very often, and I was under the impression that Bluegrasser was mistaken, hence I brought all of this up.Well pentatonic actually means "five tones". Penta= five. And he said major pentatonic scale. Not blues scale.
You know what? .... I think you're abosolutely right with.Hmm, I think my tastes run more toward Kevin Shields and J. Mascis Jr. Or, at least, if I played guitar, I would want to sound like them.
Problem with "Greatest Musician lists" is that you inevitably get into arguments between "high-brow" and "populist" forms of music.
I could say Robert Plant or Jeff Buckley are great singers, but then the opera guy will say their vocal technique is wrong, and the jazz guy will say their singing isn't creative. Rock guy calls his friends "snobs" or "elitists." His friends counterargue "well, don't you look down on hip-hop artists who sample their music, or bubblegum artists who don't write their own songs?" Same difference.
Edmondsm -- how do you feel about Allan Holdworth? A guitarist friend of mine is obsessed with his music/theory.
Edmondsm -- how do you feel about Allan Holdworth? A guitarist friend of mine is obsessed with his music/theory.
I know what he said... it's just that BB tends to play in the "Blues" scale, very often, and I was under the impression that Bluegrasser was mistaken, hence I brought all of this up.
Listen guys, I'm sorry if I got out of line trying to explain my point of view. Santana was an innovator. Great, I can except that. It is my firm opinion that the truly great artists never stop evolving, growing. I just don't see Santana doing that and that is why I refuted the post that he was the "greatest guitar player ever."
As far as being on my high-horse, I was just defending myself against Phil's all out assault on my opinion. I resorted to technical terms because it seemed like that was the most efficient way of doing that. I said myself that there was nothing wrong with using the same scale or mode to do your improvising. B.B. King: fabulous musician. Hendrix does this to, and even "virtuosos" like Joe Pass have stuff that they fall back on constantly.
Santana's playing just does nothing for me and I'll leave it at that.
I know what you're saying.Listen guys, I'm sorry if I got out of line trying to explain my point of view. Santana was an innovator. Great, I can except that. It is my firm opinion that the truly great artists never stop evolving, growing. I just don't see Santana doing that and that is why I refuted the post that he was the "greatest guitar player ever."
As far as being on my high-horse, I was just defending myself against Phil's all out assault on my opinion. I resorted to technical terms because it seemed like that was the most efficient way of doing that. I said myself that there was nothing wrong with using the same scale or mode to do your improvising. B.B. King: fabulous musician. Hendrix does this to, and even "virtuosos" like Joe Pass have stuff that they fall back on constantly.
Santana's playing just does nothing for me and I'll leave it at that.
Wait a sec... Didn't P Cash and John Mac used to play a bit of guitar? Were they in some sort of band or something? A sort of tennis playing supergroup... lol... I'm sure this is correct though...
Anyone know anything?
Yeah, Mac does play a bit of guitar. He seems to describe himself as a hack though, being a bit humble about it.Wait a sec... Didn't P Cash and John Mac used to play a bit of guitar? Were they in some sort of band or something? A sort of tennis playing supergroup... lol... I'm sure this is correct though...
Anyone know anything?
Hendrix shouldf be #1 on every list.
Listen guys, I'm sorry if I got out of line trying to explain my point of view. Santana was an innovator. Great, I can except that. It is my firm opinion that the truly great artists never stop evolving, growing. I just don't see Santana doing that and that is why I refuted the post that he was the "greatest guitar player ever."
As far as being on my high-horse, I was just defending myself against Phil's all out assault on my opinion. I resorted to technical terms because it seemed like that was the most efficient way of doing that. I said myself that there was nothing wrong with using the same scale or mode to do your improvising. B.B. King: fabulous musician. Hendrix does this to, and even "virtuosos" like Joe Pass have stuff that they fall back on constantly.
Santana's playing just does nothing for me and I'll leave it at that.
First off, I NEVER said Santana was the "greatest guitar player ever"...if you read near the beginning of this thread, he's on my list, but I'd put him somewhere around 8 or 9-on MY list. Secondly, I didn't make an "all out attack" on your opinion...I just said your opinion had nothing to do with music (you were going on about marketing and song writing). Once you pulled out the "I'm a pro and you're ignorant about music...only I know", then I questioned that approach.
As Bluegrasser said, get off your high horse. If your "musical taste" boils down to scales, tremolo bars and tone, than you don't truely KNOW music...as Bluegrasser said, again, it's all about feeling. If technique is the ONLY criterium for great musicians, than Kenny G. would probably be right up there with Coltrane as a jazz musician. I don't care if you think CS was a "crappy guitarist"-most people wouldn't say so, but that's your opinion. Only, next time, don't come off as an arrogant little shiate about it. Oh, btw, I was a "professional" musician too...I got paid for playing parties and bar gigs, years ago. What I'm saying is, "professionals" are a dime a dozen...
Wow, I got over this a while ago but appearently you needed another jab so, since I'm a big "last-word" freak like you said, I'll get right to it.
My orginal post about Santana had nothing to do with you. I was responding to someone else's comment that brought up Santano only, so if YOU actually read the whole thread you'll see how this all began.
Secondly, you did attack my opinion, actually getting personal before me, refering to me as a purist and then you went on to say that because I am well versed in the technical aspects of music I "lack the larger perspective". Which is a proposturous comment because it flies in the face of what higher education is all about: gaining perspective.
Admittedly I was offended and got personal with you for which I apologize.
"If technique is the ONLY criterium for great musicians, than Kenny G. would probably be right up there with Coltrane as a jazz musician." I just have to point out what an obsurd statement that is. Coltrane was a master technician, maybe the greatest ever on that instrument. Kenny G dropped out of music school because he couldn't make the jazz band.
If it is all about feeling like you said, is James Brown the greatest musician of all time?
Put your fangs away Phil.
I don't think calling someone a "purist" qualifies as a personal insult. If it does, you're the first to claim it.
James Brown, as far as I know, didn't actually play an instrument...yet he's right up there as one of the greatest modern innovator, band leader, vocal stylist and MUSICIANS of all time...so yes..."feeling" is a big part of that. Without James Brown, there is no Parliament, no Sly & the Family Stone, no "funk" as we know it. Rap? Take your pick...the list goes on. His band/his leadership was also an incredible breeding ground for musicians who went on to become innovators in their own right.
I think you do lack the "larger perspective" that you claim to have, but that's just my opinion...education is supposed to continue after formal, higher education ends...I know a lot of people with fine educations who simply haven't been there and done that. So you'd do well to go back to the woodshed. And, maybe work on that think skin of yours...
Yeah, calling an artist a purist is an insult, at least to me it is because I'm not one.
You didn't get my tongue and cheek with the James Brown thing. It's all about the feeling, "I've got the feeling." As in the song. Thanks anyway for your breakdown of James Brown's influence on music. I'll make sure to print it in the latest issue of DUH! the magazine.
I'm not going to give up on this perspective thing, given the fact that I've played music from ever century going back to 1500 and you think a professional musician is somebody who played in bars and house parties for free-booze and tips.