playfairplease
New User
someone objected to thread on topic cuz mentioned a kids last name and was not sensitive to the feelings of that 14 yr old player. Lots of discussion in other threads that include personal things about kids and their playing. This thread did not do that. Nobody seems reluct to talk about why some kid is not a great tennis player or won't be able to go pro or what her parents are doing wrong. Lot of discussin and names and criticism of kids and their parents-lots of names used. The pulled thread relied only on information that is public and on the USTA web site. Nothing personel that is not public was ever mentioned. Pulled thread mentioned only the last name of kid who has signed up but not played for at least 34 fournaments in the last year. Objection was that the behaivor was due to parents. The kid has probably noticed that he has not shown up to tournaments so it is not obvious why this post would come as a surprise. Should there be no discussoin of something hurful to at least 34 kids and to the entire ranking system. Could kid have a influential coach that got thread pulled. Influence/money was part of the complaint on the thread. A kid who does not show to 34 tournaments is not being sensitive to the other kids. Mentioned in the thread was how unfair and insensitive this kind of cheating is to all the other kids who show up but have no match and to those working on ranking who may get less favorable draws due to lower ranking compared to kid with points from no shows. The USTA Eastern-metro section does not seem to pp. Kid mention and maybe others sign up for tourneys every week intending to play only those that will help their ranking. They have the money to do that but save the money on transportation and hotel if they do not like draw. They no show/inj/defaut/em. Kid mentioned did that for 34 tourneys this year. This is not personal it is on the USTA Ranking Eastern/met b12 and 14. 34 kids got pts not earned-sometimes as many as 120. You can win 8 regional trounaments and not even have as many as given to one kid unfortunate enough tove been matched with this kid. Not only does it make the ratings a joke but but some famileis may have sacrificed to get to a Friday match for nothing. No names only issue-and the previous thread had no personal things mentioned at all. intersting that it got pulled when others here talk about very personal things about players and their parents which is pretty terrible since the child discussed has not done anything to other children and their families. In contrast, the discussion in the pulled thread was clearly about taking advantage of other kids, and other families and an institution that does nothing about it. Got to wonder! If this causes social discomfortableness and stops more people from cheating than it is worth while.