Who's your favorite current male tennis player? What are their pros and cons?

[Federer20042006]

The non-MM H2H is 9-2 and Federer deserves the credit for playing his peak heart out to secure those two triumphant victories against the fragile slender unsure teenage boy Nadal playing grass first time.

Fragile slender pony tail Federer playing grass for the first time beat Peak Sampras at Wimbledon.

Also, Juice-dal has finally settled into his prime on grass, with 2R, 1R, 4R results, showing that the little boy Federer beat finally learned how to play on "grass."

 

[Mayonnaise]

You're dumber than dumb if you don't get that it's the same argument to reference a player losing a single match to a single player, but MUCH weaker in fact. Ask anyone else here. They'll help your pea brain.

It's not the same. The fact that you think they're the same is... shocking? Maybe not

 

[Deleted member 716271]

It's not the same. The fact that you think they're the same is... shocking? Maybe not

Would you admit you were wrong if you realized it or not? Because I think you realize it... :lol:

 

[Mayonnaise]

Would you admit you were wrong if you realized it or not? Because I think you realize it... :lol:

A match is 1 match. 1. One. Uno. Solitary. Individual.

A head-to-head is all the matches. Multiple. Several. Many. Or maybe even 0/1.

Do you understand now?

 

[SoBad]

Fragile slender pony tail Federer playing grass for the first time beat Peak Sampras at Wimbledon.

Also, Juice-dal has finally settled into his prime on grass, with 2R, 1R, 4R results, showing that the little boy Federer beat finally learned how to play on "grass."

Great peak Sampras destroyed by brilliant Safin millennium slam never recovered losing to mugs early next 3 slams before joke 01final against 5’ no-weapon Hewitt.

 

[SoBad]

If the non-MM H2H is 9-2, you're admitting Nadal's 27 Masters are Mickey Mouse titles :lol:

I don't recall prestigious slam-grade events like Monte Carlo factoring into the MM, do you?:lol:

 

[Deleted member 716271]

A match is 1 match. 1. One. Uno. Solitary. Individual.

A head-to-head is all the matches. Multiple. Several. Many. Or maybe even 0/1.

Do you understand now?

Yes so 1 match should be even LESS evidence of anything. Are you high?

Arguing against yourself.

:lol: :lol:

 

[beast of mallorca]

The non-MM H2H is 9-2 and Federer deserves the credit for playing his peak heart out to secure those two triumphant victories against the fragile slender unsure teenage boy Nadal playing grass first time.

Are you saying that Federer will always be Nadal's lapdog b.tch ? Sweeeet :twisted:

 

[Mayonnaise]

I don't recall prestigious slam-grade events like Monte Carlo factoring into the MM, do you?:lol:

But to recall it might bring to the forefront a lackadaisical approach to what could very well be a potential well of disappointment arising from the prurient need to surreptitiously tug at the material holding it in firm, don't you think?

 

[Mayonnaise]

Yes so 1 match should be even LESS evidence of anything. Are you high?

Arguing against yourself.

:lol: :lol:

The point isn't if it's less relevant. The point is that it's different.

Besides, one match could be way more significant than a whole H2H. For instance, isn't Wawrinka's win against Nadal at the AO more significant than their H2H? :lol:

 

[Deleted member 716271]

The point isn't if it's less relevant. The point is that it's different.

Besides, one match could be way more significant than a whole H2H. For instance, isn't Wawrinka's win against Nadal at the AO more significant than their H2H? :lol:

No way...maybe if Nadal didn't have 14 slams of his own. What a poor argument lmao...

 

[SoBad]

Are you saying that Federer will always be Nadal's lapdog b.tch ? Sweeeet :twisted:

This is so unfair – Federer is not a dog, he is a human being. And queeniness is not a sin – some guys just like carrying purses, wearing makeup, etc. And it’s not his/her fault that plastic surgery has limitations – there are things that money cannot buy. Feder does not look down on fat girls. The great champion is playing better than ever, I can easily see him turning the 2-9 into 22-9 and maybe a couple of Olympics on top of that!

 

[Mayonnaise]

No way...maybe if Nadal didn't have 14 slams of his own. What a poor argument lmao...

A poor argument, not because it isn't right, but because it's futile? Perhaps

 

[SoBad]

But to recall it might bring to the forefront a lackadaisical approach to what could very well be a potential well of disappointment arising from the prurient need to surreptitiously tug at the material holding it in firm, don't you think?

I am not sure about the prurient surreptitiously tug, but I do know that getting pounded by pre-secondary Gasquet is a fair precourse for years of MC competition against Nadal!…:lol:

 

[Mayonnaise]

I am not sure about the prurient surreptitiously tug, but I do know that getting pounded by pre-secondary Gasquet is a fair precourse for years of MC competition against Nadal!…:lol:

What do you think this was a precourse for?

 

[Deleted member 716271]

What do you think this was a precourse for?

You're in the other thread claiming Borg was better than Nadal!

What a troll!

 

[newpball]

My favorite tennis players with trends (-, 0, +):

Nadal (0), Djokovic (0), Ferrer (-), Del Potro (0), Dimitrov (+) and Dolgopolov (+).

Nadal
Pros: style
Cons: inconsistent

Djokovic
Pros: focus
Cons: less flashy

Ferrer
Pros: fighter
Cons: attitude

Del Potro
Pros: strokes
Cons: injury prone

Dimitrov
Pros: all round player
Cons: his breaktrough is taking forever

Dolgopolov
Pros: drive
Cons: focus

:grin:

 

[ktid]

I sometimes wonder why I came back to this forum.

Anway Murray

Pro: Backhand variety and return of serve
Con: Has to do everything the hard way

 

[Gonzo_style]

Are you saying that Federer will always be Nadal's lapdog b.tch ? Sweeeet :twisted:

Yes of course, we saw that Federer is inferior player in 2004 when 17-years old Nadal wiped the court with him in straight sets.

 

[generous50]

I don't know if Nadal or Murray has downsides. I wonder who's more popular in the U.S.?

 

[tennisaddict]

Yes of course, we saw that Federer is inferior player in 2004 when 17-years old Nadal wiped the court with him in straight sets.

Inferior player with 17-6-302.. Epic Burn.

 

[rainingaces]

Delpo has the best forehand the game has ever seen and all out attack, that's reason enough no matter how many times he is injured.