Prisoner of Birth
Banned
I'd say "no."
Isn't Nadal a mediocre net player?
the Bryan brothers probably could do it.
I don't think anyone here who's played doubles competitively would say that two singles players, great as they may be, who have never played together and most likely don't have much team synergy going on would be able to beat a seasoned championship winning team.
That's like sticking a bunch of the current All-Stars together in a basketball team and expecting them to beat the 90s Bulls.
Doesn't the old tennis saying go "McEnroe and anyone else"?
I agree with this guy.the Bryan brothers probably could do it.
Isn't Nadal a mediocre net player?
McEnroe has said Nadal is the best volley on tour. McEnroe said this in 2011 and 2012.
McEnroe has said Nadal is the best volley on tour. McEnroe said this in 2011 and 2012.
Just noting, McEnroe said it twice. A lot of other things you only hear McEnroe say once.
Like "No comment?"
McEnroe was one of the best doubles players in world history, so I think his opinion that Nadal is the best volleyer in the top 4 is extremely valid. Nadal is very adept as volleying (reached USO 2004 SF in doubles).
Federer isn't really a team player (see Davis Cup results) whereas Nadal is much more of a team player, so they wouldn't make a great team. And Nadal has reached the SF of the US Open in 2004 in doubles, so he's got a great doubles slam performance under his belt (when Nadal was only 18).
It doesn't necessary mean if Fed and Nadal are best in singles they would be best in doubles. It's a whole different ball game. You get guys who only play doubles and nothing else. There is a lot of tactics, selection of shots and communication going on. You may be surprised.
In soccer for example, it's better to have well synchronised team of average players than having an average team with 2 or 3 brilliant individuals with big egos that struggle to connect with the team.
Isn't Nadal a mediocre net player?
He's gotten better over the years. Anyway, he can cover the baseline with his lightning coverage and Federer takes the net
McEnroe has said Nadal is the best volley on tour. McEnroe said this in 2011 and 2012.
Silly premise: two great singles players does not at all guarantee a great doubles team.
They would be beaten by quite a few doubles TEAMS:
Newcombe-Roche
Hewitt-McMillan
Fleming-McEnroe
Flach-Seguso
Woodbridge-Woodforde
Nestor-Zimonjic
Bryan brothers
The OT poster is the definition of clueless 100 teams would own them easily
Note that just because Federer and Wawrinka can win a gold medal playing the Bryans does not then necessarily imply that Federer and Nadal can do the same.
For one, Federer and Wawrinka have grown up together and are friends. A lot of doubles success is team synergy. Conversely, Nadal and Federer have very divergent personalities and would struggle to form the sort of team culture that a championship winning team needs.
Of note also is the fact that Federer/Wawrinka's success in doubles hasn't persisted, which is what you would expect from a more seasoned pair. I suspect that the Bryans were a bit starstruck that day and that compounded with Federer playing very well resulted in a win for them.
Silly premise: two great singles players does not at all guarantee a great doubles team.
They would be beaten by quite a few doubles TEAMS:
Bromwich-Quist
Sedgman-McGregor
Newcombe-Roche
Hewitt-McMillan
Fleming-McEnroe
Flach-Seguso
Woodbridge-Woodforde
Nestor-Zimonjic
Bryan brothers
Yeah, right. The 100 teams that couldn't even beat Federer+Wawrinka.
ROFL.
They would be destroyed by Sedgman/McGregor,Woodbridge/Woodforde,Mac/Flemming
None of th current teams,son
:lol::lol::lol:
Your excuse is your complete tennis iliteracy.
You even make dummie ABMK look great
If you're gonna call someone illiterate, atleast spell "illiterate" right. Oh, the irony.
With federer's great overheads, the forehand and the quickness to end points and with nadals topspin which none of the doubles volleyers are really used to, the dip they could make a good team
Federer isn't really a team player (see Davis Cup results) whereas Nadal is much more of a team player, so they wouldn't make a great team. And Nadal has reached the SF of the US Open in 2004 in doubles, so he's got a great doubles slam performance under his belt (when Nadal was only 18).
Being friends has little to do with team synergy. I'm pretty sure Federer knows more about Nadal's game (by that I mean his strengths and weaknesses), and vice versa, than he does about Wawrinka's game. And why on Earth are people assuming Federer+Nadal are gonna just meet on-court and start playing seasoned doubles players? They're gonna work together for atleast a while before their first match (like Federer and Wawrinka did for the Olympics) and they can take their match practice from there. Really, [(Federer+Nadal)/2 X 0.8] > [(Bryan Brothers)/2 X 1.2] if you wanna talk coordination and synergy.