Search results

Thats well put. Suddenly we have all these *******s jumping on the Roddick bandwagon in an attempt to take some of the glory off the great achievement by Federer. This is a historic achievement. Cheer him. Don't try to throw dirt on a great tennis player. He is just an average player for...

What a great article; I loved it! Thanks for bringing it to our attention.

Yep, he is back to beeng his normal self ............. unbeatable. I expect him to really tear up the rest of the season.

And that Roddick deserves the win. He trained so hard, he has improved so much, and there was sun in his eyes deliberately set by the wimps at Wimby who still hate the Colonials.

When criteria for entry is watered down, the selection becomes meaningless. Chang and Noah are players who are rememberd well beyond their playing career and deserve the formalization of that recognition that has been given to them by tennis fans. Roddick is nothing by comparison. He will not...

no comment.

I used to skip posts like that from people too lazy to use caps but have given up. All the kids seem to write that way now.

Yah its a shame. Looks like a well written article by a med student who skipped all his English classes.

No it doesn't because he does not read some of the cra* thats posted here.

And 4 years on TW when, I presume some posts of others were read. Not digested, just read.

Oh, Nadal up to semis, when he finally meets a top 10 player to whom he will lose.

Oh yes we do. Djokovic's parents were a big issue for a while and Fed's relations with Mirka, as a couple of examples.

Cinnci and Canada are a real chance for him. He has hardly any points to defend (0 at Cin and 150 in Can) but Fed is also in the same boat (10 at Can and 150 in Cin). And I am sure Federer is going to be blazing there. With Nadal having to defend 1450 points there, it will just give Fed a...

Cinnci and Canada are a real chance for him. He has hardly any points to defend (0 at Cin and 150 in Can) but Fed is also in the same boat (10 at Can and 150 in Cin). And I am sure Federer is going to be blazing there. With Nadal having to defend 1450 points there, it will just give Fed a...

It seems to me that players who are considered great (Sampras, Connors, McEnroe, Borg) were healthy during their careers. I don't remember any of them missing tournaments because they were sick or injured. So, they were either very lucky, or they just took care of themselves. Maybe a bit of...

I agree with everything you say, but the personalities part. I wasn't following pro tennis when Sampras was playing (only a little bit), but it seems to me their personalities are very similar: boring. Thats what I didn't like about Federer until recently when he seemed to start to reveal a...

Did you ever notice that after each player's name at a draw there is an indication of the country he is from? A little USA, AUS, ARG, etc. Ever wonder why? Just think about it. Not must support but that you will support. A very rational presumption for every country of the world other than...

4 finals to the same person if you add the 2006 USO. Hey, Roddick might have a chance to pick up another loss there this year.

Thats very good.

He was always a jerk and is still a jerk. Don't think that having played "the match of his life" he will be any different. Just another loss by Roddick. Big deal.

And did you by chance notice how any of the other married slam winners paid tribute to their wives? Did any mention their wives?

You are right. Sticking Rahdick in there, to lose to Federer for the 4th time at Wimby, was a bit of a gift. Sure would have been nice to see Nadal/Fed there. Well, there is always next year. Until then, Nadal can work on trying to get his #1 back.

What a sorry tournament. Not a single player from top 20. Thank you Andy for helping make it so.

And thats based on...............? Thats what I thought. Nothing!

Murray is rated #3. Its based on the number of points he earned during the past 52 weeks and he is properly rated #3. What would you rate him? #6? #12? His fans would "rate" him #1. Rating based on points takes away the nonsense of a personal opinion, which varies from one individual to another.

Just curious. Who is on your ignore list?

Get rid of the grass. Look at the retirements during the grass matches. Its dangerous. Lets not use it. Hell with "tradition".

deleted 2chars

deleted. 1chars

They have. So what else is new?