Search results

If this were about Federer and Nadal or Novak and Murray there would be absolutely no question about whose career exceeded the others.. The most majors and cgs would win out hands down.

It is difficult to take a comment like that seriously when it comes from an acknowledged hater.

Sampras fan?

First of all, I play five days a week. I love the game. But it is in fact a dying game along with golf. The school district in which I teach has dropped tennis and in its place has instituted***are you ready?*** PICKLEBALL. I realize my district alone does not define a trend. But community...

It's been Roger ever since he defeated Pete in 2001 W. But since 2007 some of his other fans have become so obnoxious in their trivialization of Nadal's game and accomplishments that I eventually became a fan of Nadal also even though I hated that Nadal kept depriving Roger of his career slam...

On this board for sure.

Couldn't Federer and Djok take out bank loans so they could take advantage of this expensive treatment?

Such a statement is inane. Everyone does NOT know he is clean. If he was clean all he had to do was submit to the test. It looks more like he was doping and feared the test would expose him as a doper and chose to try to evade being caught by refusing the test.

Which Murray are you all talking about? Surely not Andy. If he is such a wondrous grass court player why has he only been victorious one time at Wimby?

Yes. But they are usually the same posters who claim they have inside knowledge about how he loads up on PEDs and for that reason never tires.

All you have to do is read some of the comments by people on this forum. When they complain about Nadal being just an over muscled athlete without the proper technique of Roger........... well, that indicates a mind set of tennis being not a sport but simply a game. And games have difficulty...

Really? Very interesting. What if someone were to post on a public forum that all of their research led them to believe you are a pedophile?

Since you don't know how to use red to indicate sarcasm I did it for you.

Nice backpedal brooksie.

Or just amputate one of Nadal's legs.

The same almighty Fed who has yet to adjust to Nadal's game? After eight years? Suddenly he would adjust to playing with a wooden racquet? Heck. He has had trouble adjusting to a slightly larger head of the same racquet he has used for years. I love Roger. But adaptability is not in his...

Now that is funny. Cahill giving one of the greatest players of all time tips on how to beat another player. Does anyone here believe Cahill in his prime could take even a single point off Federer?

It must be quite embarrassing for Fed to be the most talented player and yet be so lacking in success against a less talented player such as Nadal.

I guess I missed that 'grueling' 2013 semifinal match.

You need to fix your sarcasm recognition center.

If you 'stopped' pro tennis for one year and informed the pros they had that year off to learn to use 'gut strung woodies' at the end of the first year back the current players would be ranked, Nadal1, Joker2, Fed3 and Murray4. The same players would adapt their game to what was necessary to...

There is a difference between supporting/liking a player and continually bad mouthing a player. When you come into a thread for the sole purpose of denigrating a player or one of his/her fans it quickly becomes evident and other board members pick up on it even if they do not call you out on it.

Best thread ever. Why? The haters stayed away!

Samantha Stosur's.

Who even inferred such a thing? Or are you just exaggerating for effect? I doubt if the most die hard Nadal fan would say Roger lacks skills.

Angie B Thank You Angie

Best comment of the year hands down!

LOL. Funny post. Anyone know who the last player was who beat Federer in a H.C. Masters? LOL. Talk about a weird post. Shame on me for contributing.

Wow. Just wow! Amazing!

Did Im miss any ifs?