Search results

Well that settles the mystery how you “own” arguments: you decide what is a fact, who is eligible to count as a supporter and what is reality. Quite a high wall of self-deceit you’ve built yourself. But I guess it’s just easier for some people that way. And you talk about detached from reality ...

So how come 2-3 guys actually agreed with this? And if you look at the posts, I think it’s clear who is upset and felt the need to come running to protect his idol’s reputation ;) I merely stated the obvious truth and you still can’t take it!

Fedberg as in Edberg + Fed but I don’t expect you to know players before Nole’s time - hell you don’t even know that Nole is the biggest Fed wannabe! :) Most of your arguments are really bad, actually. You just end up repeating the same flawed things all over again, and you mightily struggle...

1. I don't worship Roger - and are you really the guy to talk against worshiping when you name yourself NoleFam and have your head so deep in Nole's ass he can actually feel it? 2. Nole really wants to be Roger - he wants the unconditional love and approval from the fans, the crowds, the players...

Look, if you can't take the truth, then don't seek it out. Hide between your shield and believe any lie you want to tell yourself. But your boy is a Fed wannabe through and through. And the thread was ruined by your buddy, the hater, who simply couldn't get over this season and some simple...

I don't want to get in a debate with you, it always ends the same with you saying "we have to agree to disagree" and not taking any argument into consideration. This posts reeks of false truths as usual. So I'll just leave you with a well known joke from these parts (Western Balkans): Son...

I don't want to get in a debate with you, it always ends the same with you saying "we have to agree to disagree" and not taking any argument into consideration. This posts reeks of false truths as usual. So I'll just leave you with a well known joke from these parts (Western Balkans): Son...

Right, I am going to attribute this tantrums to some sort of end season madness and just temporarily ignore you then. And it’s not censoring, it’s just trying to stop this crap being shoved down my throat in every single thread, related or not related to that kiddy tournament. I’d say...

Djokovic is the biggest Fed wannabe out there, LOL. He wants love and adoration of fans, which Roger already has. He wants to be the best tennis player ever, which Roger already is. He is even more PC in his interviews than Roger, which when you take into account his on-court behaviour...

Just one question - are you going to be bringing up that kiddy tournament throughout the WTF? Even in match threads? Because right now you are downright obnoxious and close to being intolerable, massively overhyping every single aspect of low-quality level tennis played by little boys rules.

Interesting to see what the top players think about them: http://www.atpworldtour.com/en/news/stars-views-on-next-gen-atp-finals-2017-innovations All I'll say is they are pretty unanimous.

Fairly straightforward and pretty much par for the course for Fed in the opening match. He seemed extremely confident he'll win - even Sock seemed somewhat resignated in losing this match. Sock didn't play badly, has a good serve and a good FH to back it up, but he was never winning this. Do...

Well, now you are opening a whole can of worms with what CAN be done. You CAN also have the WTF played on a court made up of 60 % HC, 30 % clay and 10 % grass to accurately represent the current ATP tour distribution. You CAN have 3 different WTF tournaments on HC, clay and grass to make it most...

Double post

That just confirms you as a bitter Fed hater, nothing else. Roger is likeable because he is a winner, a generally nice guy and because of the simply brilliant style he plays. Sure, he is not perfect, but that only brings him closer to the people as nobody is. No amount of media "fake stories"...

Lol @jm1980 your anti-establishment guy is sending love to the crowd after every match! He is actually forcing the ball boys to do it as well - he wants the love and adoration Fedal gets, but he can’t get it. So he is not anti-establishment, he is just not good enough to get there. Lol. And as...

Interesting. So now even a Federer fan (or more) thinks that ATP actually rigs the awards and fabricates player’s votes or just donwright lies about them just to even further promote someone that 2-3 years down the line won’t even play the game? And not just once, but 15 years in a row? Even...

Ah, the old VB's H2H argument. But since this is supposedly a RF forum let's look at it from the perspective that actually matters in tennis, which means winning titles or going deep. So just the big titles/finals 2016/2017: AO 2016: Nole vs Murray; IW: Nole vs Raonic; Miami: Nole vs Kei; Monte...

That's because the "set" is over after freaking 4 games! It's equivalent to a guy coming back from a break down in the 1st set of a normal match. But since they are now designated as sets, you feel the matches are much more uncertain and people "come back" after being down. In reality, you've...

Look, Meles, you can overyhpe it to the maximum, it still won't change what I saw. And that was two kids playing kiddy format tennis with almost 0 emotions in a match apart from Coric's little tantrums. The speed of the match was unnatural and took a lot tension out of the key or deciding...

I've watched yesterday's first SF. If this is how the new "product" will look, I am certainly not buying it; haven't seen a more boring match in years. It's OK for a children's game, but I simply can't see it translating well into men's game. Hopefully, they never enforce the no-ad and short...

I am sure it’s a great model, but I have played tennis and in my opinion any such simulation is pure speculation. When you change the rules of the game so abruptly, there is no telling what would happen. Tennis is primarily a mental game and having more pressure situations would change the...

I am sorry but how on Earth can you get those numbers when Roger has never in his live played a 4 game set with a deciding point or ad scoring? Where is this coming from?

Actually, those of us who have actually watched tennis back then will surely remember Roger's win in 2009 against Soderling, even though that particular tournament will always be remembered by Soderling taking out Nadal. However, Soderling reached the final the next season and only his illness...

The 80s and 90s was a what if scenario - I am fully aware of the date. However, I completely disagree with you about HC not being the safest bet. Roughly 60-70 % of the tour is HC and a huge majority of the top tournaments that yield most points - 2 Slams, 6 Masters (10.000 points) compared to 1...

I am not completely against it, but I think it's mostly due to the fact it would be too much of a sudden surface change. It would also lead to some LOL moments in the past, when not all guys could play well on all surfaces. For instance, imagine Sampras and Becker having to contest the WTF on...

So you are saying you didn't say he was peak in 2015, all you said was that he was playing "his best tennis ever in a period of 5 months"? You really can't make this stuff up! :D:D:D And btw, you probably forget as you post this crap every day in every single thread - and get called on it...

No, it's true. The others have no chance against a guy capable of presenting stats like this: :D:D:D:D:D:D:D And where are you going? The fun has just started! RF-18, Sep 19, 2015 :D:D:D:D

Buddy, you are the joke of the forum. People laugh at you every day in every single thread about you putting Roger 2015 on a pedestal in order to prop up Nole's wins against a 34 year old. How's the username treating you? Must be great when your biggest dreams are not only fulfilled, but...

Can you refer to a post in which you didn't say Federer was peak in 2015? You're welcome. :rolleyes: