HipHopTennisStar
New User
I'm currently playing with the Wilson K factor 6.1 95. I am thinking about maybe switching to the newer version. What are the advantages of switching? I love the K factor 6.1. Anyone made this switch?
Any1 switch from Wilson 6.1 95 to new BLX 95?
- Thread starter HipHopTennisStar
- Start date
HipHopTennisStar
New User
Wow, what a forum? One day and no replies. Thanks guys
Federerkblade
Hall of Fame
yup i switched and the subtle diffs are worth it
tennisntn3477
Rookie
You are asking about a frame that has only been available for purchase by majority of forum members for a little over a week - you are going to have to give K95 owners time to demo/test and decide before expecting a lot of immediate feedback.
BobFL
Hall of Fame
+1. Completely different racquet! If someone wants to switch to the new paint job - do not do it. FWIW, I absolutely hated K6195 but BLX95 (1820) is simply great.
or PSC 95 for that matter
I have the N95, k95, and new blx95 (16x18). The blx is less harsh than the k95 and a little firmer than the N95. It is a better N95 in my opinion. I have switched and love the racket, you can forget the dampener, and the new technology makes it obsolete.
The new BLX95 is a very solid frame, best of the 6.1 series. I gave up on the K95; it was way to stiff for my shoulder. The N95 was soft, but lacked the punch of the BLX 95.
Court_Jester
Hall of Fame
I hated the K6.1 95 series because of the stiffness. The BLX is a very good replacement but I don't think it's as solid or stable as my venerable N6.1 95. For me, it's going to need some lead tape to make it more to my liking.
Maybe true, but what counts for me is how they feel during a match, and it is an awsome frame. I think Wilson realized the K95 was to stiff and harsh and designed the BLX 95 after the N95. I am enjoying hitting with the frame about 20 hours of play so far and it was an easy transistion for me.
hey, tnx guys for that info. I've been playing N95 for years and then I switched to K95, I've been telling my self that its just the same racquet, but I know for sure its not. Its too stiff and all. Also the weight is heavier than the N95. (I mean the swing weight), I wanted to know about the weight and the swing weight, is it as heavy as the N95 and similar swing weight?
HipHopTennisStar
New User
I only seen the blx 95 in stores but the k95 seems more solid to me.
BobFL
Hall of Fame
What do you mean? You only saw the BLX95 but the K95 is more solid? Have you tried it?
Arize
Rookie
Hi, I used the K95 last year for a good 6 months or so, I like the racquet but started getting shoulder issues due to a more extreme grip/swing which I have modified to sustain my shoulder, I think the N95 was a much better racquet compared to the K95 and I now have the BLX 95 and I think it is more manuverable, softer and more firm on impact which should be easier on your shoulder (This is why I would switch). So for sure the BLX is a KF killer in my eyes. Comparing to the N95 I still think the BLX takes the prize it just feels as it has more power, more firmness and a better pop... However I still need a few more weeks to play with it to be sure but so far I am loving the BLX and I think it's the best 6.1 line I have played with thus far, I hope this helps and good luck.
rlau
Hall of Fame
That attitude won't get you very far, dude.
If you demo the new BLX 6.1 95 for yourself, you can compare it to the K95 and share your observations here.
you guys are making me want to demo the BLX. Like some of you, we all discover the difference between the N95 and the K95. I dnt know if anyone of you have tried to hit with the k95 asian version. this is my current racquet I use. The specs are: 16x18, 95 sq in headsize, weight written in the racquet 10.9 oz. balance 8pts HL. I really like this racquet I would say its in the middle of N95 and K95. If ever you guys have tried this racquet, maybe you can post a review or comparison. thank you.
My opinion is the BLX95 is the most user friendly 6.1. I've tried the classic but not the N as I took a break from the game at the time. The BLX95 and K95 are both very solid frames, but the BLX has transitioned to slightly lighter and slightly more dampened/comfortable, but still a firm feeling. What the BLX has lost is perhaps some of the stability and feel of the K95 but then again u get more comfort and mobility. Personally i think they had made it a little too light now but theres always lead. I just got the BLX90 demo and its power level is more predictable for me, but it is a demanding frame indeed esp after a few hrs. If they made a BLX90 in a 95 that would be perfect for me- little more pop and spin and forgiveness. More of u guys should try the Volkl PB10MP, that is the one i'm leaning towards. I gives u a nice balance of everything imho and u dont have to be a 5.5 player.
BobFL
Hall of Fame
I demoed it yesterday and it was simply excellent. K95 was raw and harsh. Btw, my kitchen scale showed: 12.5oz (with tourna ovegrip). It is everything but too light
BobFL
Hall of Fame
keep in mind, the point of this thread is to give opinions regarding the differences bet the K95 and BLX95 thx
if you actually READ what was written, i said it was a little lighter than the K95. If you've become accustomed to the K95's swingweight or other heftier sticks, be prepared for a slightly lighter swinging stick IMHO. if this is not your opinion that is fine but i only wish to give my take on the racquet and want to be clear about it. btw i returned the BLX95 today, but i do still have the BLX90 in hand.
static wt and bal have remained pretty much the same imo not using scales or anything. but the swingweight is the thing which can be affected by other various factors i feel like stiffness, distribution of new materials etc IMO
perhaps even the new paintjob is more aerodynamic who knows
perhaps even the new paintjob is more aerodynamic who knows
It is def worth a demo then you yourself can try to distinguish the two for the OP. Different is different, i would not say they are completely different tho. I mean similar wt, bal, mold, string pattern etc. I will try not to say one is great and perfect while the other one sucks. Really depends on your preference. At the moment actually i'm kinda undecided bet the K and BLX95 but probably the BLX95 has the edge for me in overall performance and versatility. I think Wilson did a rather good job addressing player's issues with the K (sluggish, stiff). It could be tough to tweek a racquet to what most ppl would like. I know with other brands they failed miserably with their updates.
from what i remember of the PSC, it was rather stiff and sluggish. I preferred the K over the PSC. i think u will like the BLX, more silky smooth and better spin access i think. really liked the BLX with my slice bkhd. I demoed the 18x20 by the way. I think the 16 mained one would have too much pop for me and i'm not a spinny player.
