Big Racquet Little Racquet Debate

asifallasleep

Hall of Fame
When Pete was winning all those titles, NO ONE overpowered him. In fact he was overpowering everyone, Andre included with his little 85's. Everyone else had larger and more powerful racquets but Pete still won.

Fed does rather well with his low/mid powered 90's while everyone else wields larger and way more powerful racquets.

So this argument that the smaller frames can't handle the larger more powerful frames i think is a product of what the industry has put in everyone's hands. People have grown accustomed to playing with the larger frames as that is now the standard. Everyone uses them. Larger, more powerful racquets are easy to many as that is all they've known. They don't have to be fundamentally sound to hit the ball.

The tennis industry began creating larger more powerful racquets to enable people who otherwise would not be able to effectively play to enjoy the sport. They sought to make it easier and more available to the masses. It wasn't done at the request of the pros. Most pros continued to use their old frames and painted them. The industry wanted to sell more racquets and grow the sport.

If you're fundamentally sound, you can beat loads of people with a 85 or a 90. No problem. If you're not their yet, getting there with a smaller racquet will make you fundamentally sound.

All you guys who complain that the smaller racquets are too difficult and that the sweet spots are too small or that you can't handle players with the larger more powerful frames I say rubbish. You're lying to yourself, you can learn to play with a smaller racquet, and would become an even better player in the process.

Players today are bigger, stronger and faster. If all junior coaches taught their students on smaller frames and then perhaps switched them many years later to a larger one or not, the players would get even better.

Playing with a smaller racquet will make you a better player. And yes you can find the sweet spot.

The two most accomplished players in the history of the sport (Fed with his 90 and Pete with his 85) used little racquets and are two of the most fundamentally sound players ever.

They are consistent, balanced and powerful. All with little racquets against bigger racquets.
 

jaskasm

New User
Most mids are really heavy though, and many children would not be able to handle the weight of a mid. I think once someone gets to the 3.5-4.0+ level they should try out mids. Or once they're strong enough to wield a hefty ol' racquet thats 11.4+ oz. unstrung.
 

asifallasleep

Hall of Fame
Most mids are really heavy though, and many children would not be able to handle the weight of a mid. I think once someone gets to the 3.5-4.0+ level they should try out mids. Or once they're strong enough to wield a hefty ol' racquet thats 11.4+ oz. unstrung.

Good point. But i think they have kid frames. Also i'm speaking more to racquet head size. I'm not sure what's on the market but i remember playing as a kid with a wooden racquet and they were heavy.
 

jaskasm

New User
We'll if they have kid frames I'd say go for it. I grew up on 100 and 98 in heads and I actually wanted to switch down to a heavier mid because I love that feeling of precision and knowing where the ball is going. It helped me become FAR more confident in my playing.
 

asifallasleep

Hall of Fame
We'll if they have kid frames I'd say go for it. I grew up on 100 and 98 in heads and I actually wanted to switch down to a heavier mid because I love that feeling of precision and knowing where the ball is going. It helped me become FAR more confident in my playing.

I've tried switching to lighter frames and my game always suffered. I even found the kfactor and blx 90's to be too light and had to modify them.

Somehow the PS 85 is perfect for me in stock form. With a heavy racquet I feel i do less work and hit a way bigger ball.
 

JMcQ

Rookie
If you're fundamentally sound, you can beat loads of people with a 85 or a 90. No problem. If you're not their yet, getting there with a smaller racquet will make you fundamentally sound.

All you guys who complain that the smaller racquets are too difficult and that the sweet spots are too small or that you can't handle players with the larger more powerful frames I say rubbish. You're lying to yourself, you can learn to play with a smaller racquet, and would become an even better player in the process.

Players today are bigger, stronger and faster. If all junior coaches taught their students on smaller frames and then perhaps switched them many years later to a larger one or not, the players would get even better.

Playing with a smaller racquet will make you a better player. And yes you can find the sweet spot.

This is the same argument that golfers make trying to convince people to play "blades" as opposed to cavity-back or cut-muscle irons. And I fell for this argument buying Mizuno blades as a 14 handicapper. It sure is awesome to have players marvel at the beauty of my irons and then laugh when I spray those irons into the woods, the water, the other fairway, the golf cart. I realize now that if I had bought irons that fit my game, I would be a better golfer in the long run.

Playing with a smaller, heavier racquet may force you to learn classic, long strokes, but that does not equate to making you a better player. Otherwise, every pro (who earn a living by playing tennis) would be playing Sampras and Federer style frames. That is simply not the case. Just ask the soon to be #1 player in the world. In short, people should play the racquet that is most comfortable to them, whether it has an 85 in head or one twice that size.

And so you do not think I'm biased towards bigger, lighter, and more powerful frames, I play a Pure Storm Ltd., weighted up quite a bit. Not because I think it will make me "better," but because that is the frame I enjoy hitting with most.
 

Bigtime

Rookie
I played as a kid with the T2000, (extremely small headsize) and found that after I got back into tennis years later, and after experimenting with light oversized, then tweeners, that I prefer the precision of the smaller head size. (Also narrow beams)

Current favorite: 90 sq. in. (Dunlop AG100)
 
D

decades

Guest
There are so many threads where I get to say: it's not the racquet it's the player.
 
Top