It's like they planned their season expecting to make the Australian Open final and too tired for the week afterDear Lord, all of my guys went out 1st round in Australian Open (besides Nick the Tank) and still only 2 of them play this week. What are you waiting for?! You had the whole pre-season to rest!
So, uh, top 3 players, is it?
Also, Fritz is playing the Dallas Challenger. It started immediately after week 3. Do I not get points for his performance?
Well, on one hand, the multipliers were based off of the total points anyone gets, and those are allotted at any challenger level tournament. On the other, lower players are already favored due to more events. Then again, that's the risk of having a higher ranked player and the risk of your player playing more events- they get tired.Yes
My plan was to not include those because I'm doing the round by weeks and excluded weeks that had no tour-level tournaments (such as the 30 Jan to 5 Feb week).
If I included Dallas, Burnie, Quimper as well as San Francisco, Launceston, Budapest then I'm including 6 Challenger-level tournaments versus 3 tour-level tournaments. I think this favours the challenger-level players too heavily. But we could potentially have a league vote on it if you want.
@Big_Dangerous will be small_safe when I'm finished with him
I veto excluding.
1. Sorry but you don't have veto rights
2. The rules are currently excluding, so even if you could veto, you'd be vetoing including
3. I'll take this as a vote for including?
Label me sufficiently wooshedI was joking mate. I vote include.
So not to rush, but is the results thread on its way? Or do we typically wait a few days?
Same, but I need closure.I don't want to know...
Aye sorry guys I was overseas on holiday, will sort out the results and stuff today.
Hope it was great! I got worried!Aye sorry guys I was overseas on holiday, will sort out the results and stuff today.