[FTL] Round 4 Discussion

aceX

Hall of Fame
ibbOJTj.png

9VGBVPS.png

ORKi0rA.png


@Boozyuzi @DreddyTennis45 @mule250 @Noah Swift @PDJ @TripleATeam @Urkezi @VaBeachTennisNut @Meles @pdawg89 @The Green Mile @Big_Dangerous @BlandSam @FEDERERNADAL13 @gnana prakash @ksub @Aussie Darcy
 
Last edited:

Urkezi

Semi-Pro
Dear Lord, all of my guys went out 1st round in Australian Open (besides Nick the Tank) and still only 2 of them play this week. What are you waiting for?! You had the whole pre-season to rest!
 

aceX

Hall of Fame
Dear Lord, all of my guys went out 1st round in Australian Open (besides Nick the Tank) and still only 2 of them play this week. What are you waiting for?! You had the whole pre-season to rest!
It's like they planned their season expecting to make the Australian Open final and too tired for the week after :p
 

TripleATeam

G.O.A.T.
Also, Fritz is playing the Dallas Challenger. It started immediately after week 3. Do I not get points for his performance?
 

aceX

Hall of Fame
So, uh, top 3 players, is it?

Yes

Also, Fritz is playing the Dallas Challenger. It started immediately after week 3. Do I not get points for his performance?

My plan was to not include those because I'm doing the round by weeks and excluded weeks that had no tour-level tournaments (such as the 30 Jan to 5 Feb week).

If I included Dallas, Burnie, Quimper as well as San Francisco, Launceston, Budapest then I'm including 6 Challenger-level tournaments versus 3 tour-level tournaments. I think this favours the challenger-level players too heavily. But we could potentially have a league vote on it if you want.
 

TripleATeam

G.O.A.T.
Yes



My plan was to not include those because I'm doing the round by weeks and excluded weeks that had no tour-level tournaments (such as the 30 Jan to 5 Feb week).

If I included Dallas, Burnie, Quimper as well as San Francisco, Launceston, Budapest then I'm including 6 Challenger-level tournaments versus 3 tour-level tournaments. I think this favours the challenger-level players too heavily. But we could potentially have a league vote on it if you want.
Well, on one hand, the multipliers were based off of the total points anyone gets, and those are allotted at any challenger level tournament. On the other, lower players are already favored due to more events. Then again, that's the risk of having a higher ranked player and the risk of your player playing more events- they get tired.

I'd say it should be counted for everyone, but if it's too much work for you, I understand.
 

Meles

Bionic Poster
Do not include. Hurts me, but this does nothing for players who do Davis Cup. @aceX you are running this league and putting in the time; your decision is final in my book. We can start doing suggestions at the end of the year or just before the next trading period. This will all even out in the end. We all need to be looking at the league as it goes on for improvements. It seems like league participants might enjoy having to make some choices. Perhaps we have longer periods than a week for a round. Players then choose their best two players with backups if the player ends up playing none of the events. I know I did not enjoy seeing my opponent with 4 players for this round and I have just two.:oops:
 

gn

G.O.A.T.
1. Sorry but you don't have veto rights
2. The rules are currently excluding, so even if you could veto, you'd be vetoing including
3. I'll take this as a vote for including?

I was joking mate. I vote include.
 

gn

G.O.A.T.
It's down to the wire :D If Goffin or Pospisil wins the title, I win the R4. If Dimi wins and Popsicle loses, you win. @mule250
 
Last edited:
Top