My Thoughts on RDS 001

herosol

Professional
Hello, everyone and fellow RDS 001 MidUsers.
Here are my thoughts on the RDS 001 Mid or you could consider this a review.

There will be some comparisons between rackets like the k90, PD, PDR, and other popular frames.

First and foremost, I have to say it is a good racket. No doubt about it.
Some positives

+Feel is very nice. Groundies feel awesome
+Serves can really bring heat after taking time to get use to
+Stable
+High Control Level

Some negatives:

-Sometimes a bit unmaneuverable, but this may be due to the fact i haven't used it long enough
-The first time you play with it, you will often mis-hit, i have no idea maybe its the box shape?
-Serving in the beginning can make you pissed off, but you'll feel after a good 50+ serves

Overall, the negatives of this racket are probably due to somethings you have to get used to. Its a 1pt more headlight then my k90 or possibly 2 or 3 since i removed my leather grip off my k90; which has mostly affected my service aspect of my game.

Now.

Control: 9/10
I have to say control is off the charts, and can be taken positively or negatively. Even at a 55 Tension, which is the bare minimum of the recommended one, it really gives high control and accuracy. Mishits often fly only 1 or 2 inches past a line. But don't expect shanks to fly in, it will go out, hey it's your fault anyways.

Power 5/10
Power is there (not really), but all in all it's all about the player. If your small, skinny, no muscles at all, your only allowing this racket to burden yourself. This is more then a player's racket, it is a player's racket that requires an in-shaped user. Don't be surprised on first hits that your arm isn't a bit uncomfortable. If your coming from any kind of Babolat or above 95+ in. headsize, this will feel like concrete. Probably not even concrete, more like heading dead plastic. But again, those rackets are out of control anyways.

Volleys: 8.5/10
I wouldn't give this racket a FULL 9, but it's damn close. Obviously head light, high weight, small head size provide the stability needed at the net, but ill mark off a minimal points for the fact, it is some heavy stuff. It feels heavier, at least in my opinion. But you will get pop for sure, its crisp, and will deliver. Expect to finish off your opponent at the net. But i give it almost 9 because of the variety of players and how they judge volleying. But if your buffed up and this weight is nothing and your waving it like a feather, ill give it a 10/10, if an only if you are waving it like a feather.

Serving: 7/10
Serving, will definitely start slow in the beginning. The contact point feels different overall, and im sure the "isometric" head shape contributes, but i hit with it for two days, and on day two i got about 75% of my Kick's back, but it feels great. Has good pop and nice placement. Compared to my k90, though it does feel like crap at times. The RDS is so headlight it loses some stability at the head, which gives serves that extra boost; but hey if your expecting to hit a big banging serve, and expecting aces 1)You shouldn't since anything is hittable and 2)Go play a Babolat or something with a bigger head-size. Overall, great, you will lose your groove at first, but it won't drag your game down to a point where you lose on your serve. Dependable serving racket.

Comfort: 4/10
Comfort level is low, i mean stable rackets usually are. They are 1)Heavy 2)Have small headsize which create smaller margin of error and 3)Often create heavy vibrations through the racket. But compared to other rackets within the 90-93 Inch frame size it has the most. For example i would rate comfort level of my k90 around a 3/10, a Flexpoint Prestige Mid at around 5/10 and a Wilson Pro Staff ROK at around a 2.5/10. So if your comparing Mid-size rackets, it has great comfort. The first thing i noticed comfort wise is that it does not make a "pinging" sound. The contact sound is like wet-blanket, which some people like and others don't. Low comfort, so if your arm can't take it, don't get it.

Overall 8/10: This is not an average of the scores, rather it's a overall feeling for a score, just based on how it reacts in an actual match.

Lastly, I would say, raise 1 point on comfort, power, and serving because i'm using these Yonex Strings which are dead as crap, and if this racket had my regular PHT 16 job, it would probably be a lot better.

Enjoy. :D
 
Last edited:

snoflewis

Legend
interesting review...

my experience w/ yonex rackets is that it takes a few hitting sessions to get used to any yonex racket if the user has never played with one before. i've never seen someone have a hard time finding the swetspot, as they are relatively big, but the feel of the racket itself would take some getting used to.

i found it suprrising that you found the rds001 to be less maneuverable than your k90...because i thought swinging the k90 was like swinging a baseball bat w/ a boulder at the tip. and w/o the leather grip on the k90...it would have a higher swingweight...

although your review may have been insightful..i'll defintely have to disagree on some points.

herosol said:
If your coming from any kind of Babolat or above 95+ in. headsize, this will feel like concrete.Probably not even concrete, more like heading dead plastic. But again, those rackets are out of control anyways.

- concrete? i found all yonex rackets to play larger than their headsize suggests...probably due to the headshape. and most people will find that anytime they move on to a smaller racket...it would feel sweeter because of the concentrated sweetspot...not really sure about that concrete comment
- also, just because a racket is 95+ sq inches doesnt mean it would lack control (although i agree w/ the babolat comment). there are plenty of 95 and 98 sq in rackets out there that have excellent control...



herosol said:
but hey if your expecting to hit a big banging serve, and expecting aces 1)You shouldn't since anything is hittable and 2)Go play a Babolat or something with a bigger head-size. Overall, great, you will lose your groove at first, but it won't drag your game down to a point where you lose on your serve.

- im not really sure where you're going w/ this...i actually find it misleading. believe it or not..midsize rackets can actually produce great serves. imo, the PS 6.0 85 is less powerful in all aspects than the rds001...and people are serving great with them. im not really sure if you produce your aces w/ pure power, or a combo of pace/placement because there are FAR more powerless rackets than this one
 

JustTennis76

Hall of Fame
I demoed with the RDS 001 4 times before I ordered one last week. I have been playing with the PS Tour 90 and Ncode tour 90 for 4 years and making this switch was the most easiest thing for me. The Yonex RDS 001 feels like a 93" instead of 90" because of its head shape. During my 4 demo sessions, I hit the frame less than 5 or 6 times only. Serves are great with the RDS and it definitely is more manuverable than K90 or N90. I can already feel my game is going to be better with the RDS 001.
 

armand

Banned
??????

Lastly, I would say, raise 1 point on comfort, power, and serving because i'm using these Yonex Strings which are dead as crap, and if this racket had my regular PHT 16 job, it would probably be a lot better.
The Yonex multi is dead and so you'd switch to a much stiffer string???????????

And after this big review you don't even say if you're using the 001 Mid, or the 001 Mid+.
 
V

Vitaly Evchenkov

Guest
The RDS mid allows me to improve my first serve by being able to locate a flat fast serve either down the T or almost unhittable out wide (esp on the ad court).
Not sure why it is so much better with the RDS mid. Maybe it is because the smaller headsize allows me to "feel" where the racquet is better offering more control, or maybe it is the lower power of the frame (with other racquets my wide serve often sails wide and long, but with RDS is finds the corner lines an amazing amount of time).

The RDS is a serving machine. (especially with some lead at 3&9).
Unfortunately, if people get my serve back and/or I have an off day and don't hit double digit aces, I don't trust my groundstrokes as much I do with some other racquets.
Well, I can keep the ball in play a long time with no mishits and rallies are fine, but with other racquets I can ATTACK more and smack more winners. With the RDS, it (for me) is more of a grind it out, war of attrition stick. When I have switched mid-match to a Head Instinct, all of a sudden, I can blast a winners and keep points much shorter.
Maybe it is due to the poly strings in the Instinct, so I will continue warming up and using the RDS for casual hits, but in competition, I have more confidence w/ my aggressive style using the Instinct.

But, I will say, if I gain 10% more confidence with my forehand while using the RDS I would switch to it immediately for competition.
Nobody wants to face me when I am serving using it, so if I could instill that kind of fear from the baseline, I would be stocking up.

But then again, a lighter tweener with full poly can do its own magic on hitting crazy kickserves and just blasting winners into the back fence.... so you see where mentally I just can't decide if I want to have the all out attacking baseline game, or a big serving (and more volleying) classic game with the RDS.

AYYY! The more I think about it the crazier I get. I took the RDS out of my bag temporarily so I wouldn't be tempted to switch mid-match. So far, I haven't lost with the Instinct, so the RDS is just a training stick for thr moment.
 

herosol

Professional
uhm. thanks for the insights about this.
about the babolat thing, it is exaggeration of a few points, but im sure extended length rackets and larger head-sizes do pack a bigger punch in serves.

again. some of these things are not accurate because of the fact ive only played with it for 3 days now.

and i don't mean to say it doesn't feel larger, but i have to say it does lack alot of power. i mean at 55 lb of tension? it is a bit low. but i have a feelign the strings may contribute to this fact.

and about the Yonex strings. its probably just me but from my uses of the NXT's, x-1's, xcel, and yonex; i realize multis are just not for me.

They aren't as lively, and un-stiff when compared to polys. This may be theoritically un-true but my opinion it is.

for example, NXT's are good but die in 2 hours
x-1's are overhyped, or they probably are goood, but they just aren't for me
xcel same as x-1 but everoyne says they have lil durability yet i never broke mine
yonex, sucked on first hit

im a poly person, and you may be the exact opposite

EDIT: there. i meantioned the "mid" part
 

vkartikv

Hall of Fame
SRD Tour 90 ~ RDX 500 Mid
MP Tour 90 ~ RDS 001 Mid
If you want comfort, try one of the first two. If you want something stiffer and more like a wilson, try the second two.
 

armand

Banned
It doesn't at all seem like the 001 is for you; 55lbs with a multi and it's too low powered? Foggedaboudit

Vitaly: nice post as ever.
 

herosol

Professional
most of you miss my 8/10 overall.
why would i give a racket i don't like an 8?

i could careless about comfort.
I play in the friggin hot sun in the afternoon running left and right working myself crazy, and the comfort of my racket is the last thing i care about.

i don't like high powered rackets. why would i have been playing with the k90?

i give it low in the aspects that i really could careless about.

i like stable, high control, serving rackets.

and AGAIN. may i tell you again.
I have complete opposite feelings about polys and multis then the other half of the world. multis feel dead to me, but polys feel lively and crisp.

the other 99% of the world probably feels the exact opposite of me, but hey you play with yours, and i play with mine.
 

netman

Hall of Fame
RDS 001 MP and Topspin Cyberflash 17. A heavenly combination. Darn near impossible to hit the ball out of bounds.
 

ashwincr

New User
I demoed the RDS 001 mid and actually bought one used off the boards. I normally use the K90 and love it. Today I played a match with the RDS 001 (cyber flash 17 mains at 57 and Biphase 16 crosses at 59), and it felt realy good, and I played better than I have in a long time. don't know if this is the honeymoon effect, but I am loving the RDS 001 mid. The sweet spot is humungous compared to the K90, and the RDS felt a lot better on the return of serve.
 
Top