Rafa24
Hall of Fame
How many RG finals has Fed been in since 2011??? LOLHow many finals has he been to since 2011? LOL.
He's made 5 in his career and won 1. Nadal made 5 wimbledons and won 2.
How many RG finals has Fed been in since 2011??? LOLHow many finals has he been to since 2011? LOL.
How many RG finals has Fed been in since 2011??? LOL
He's made 5 in his career and won 1. Nadal made 5 wimbledons and won 2.
The Stanimal will show up on Sunday.
Win tomorrow would be a huge confidence boost to already confident 2017 Nadal.Even with a Nadal win on Sunday, the record will be the same 3 GS lead that Federer had for 3 years. So yes, AO 2017 was a monumental win for Roger.
He's had real challengers so far at RG?The Stanimal can show up all he wants, but this is not the AO or any HC event....this is the clay GOAT's FAVOURED surface, where I believe he's only lost once playing at prime level, and he is definitely playing at, or extremely close to that level.
Nadal was really confident in 2012, but an injury derailed him. He's no spring chicken anymore, remember he's 31. Personally I can't see Nadal going on to win another Slam this season if Federer keeps playing like early 2017, especially if the latter get the 19th.Win tomorrow would be a huge confidence boost to already confident 2017 Nadal.
Nadal is 70% confidence, 30% the rest.
With that, he could easily close to within 2 of RF before end of 2015, and being healthy (how may be questionable) and 5 years younger than RF, if I had the nick name like yours, I would not be so overconfident with the overall end result...
No, really, not actually. Nadal has won Wimbledon and the USO. Don't know what he will do this year but he is the best player right now.Yeah really actually.
To almost losing his slam advantage vs Nadal.
Just think about it, if he lost the AO this year, he would be at 17 slams, while Rafa would be at 16 already tomorrow.
His AO win was so crucial, he took matters into his own hands and helped his legacy.
So instead of 1 slam advantage he will still have 3 now.
No, really, not actually. Nadal has won Wimbledon and the USO. Don't know what he will do this year but he is the best player right now.
This debate is a waste of time. Nadal is currently playing very well. We will soon find out how long that lasts.Actually you're wrong. Who cares if Nadal won Wimbledon back in 2010. He hasn't won since and has been a non-factor in the last 5 years. Those are the data which cannot be denied.
This debate is a waste of time. Nadal is currently playing very well. We will soon find out how long that lasts.
Actually you're wrong. Who cares if Nadal won Wimbledon back in 2010. He hasn't won since and has been a non-factor in the last 5 years. Those are the data which cannot be denied.
I'd be careful if I were you tbh. being so emphatic as if you've seen a crystal ball never bodes well. stats can't be denied ofc, but idt tennis lives or dies by stats all the timeIt's a waste of time because you make meaningless statements like we don't know what Nadal's gonna do. Uh, duhhhhh. We don't know how anyone is actually gonna do. But if you want to predictions you look at history. In recent history Nadal has been a complete non-factor at Wimbledon since 2012. Ask Rosol, Darcis, Kyrgios. By the way in many of those years he won the FO (in dominant fashion at that) and then disappeared at Wimbledon. Those are the data which cannot be denied.
I'd be careful if I were you tbh. being so emphatic as if you've seen a crystal ball never bodes well. stats can't be denied ofc, but idt tennis lives or dies by stats all the time
Who ever said Nadal was going to win Wimbledon? Are you confusing me with some other poster?It's a waste of time because you make meaningless statements like we don't know what Nadal's gonna do. Uh, duhhhhh. We don't know how anyone is actually gonna do. But if you want to predictions you look at history. In recent history Nadal has been a complete non-factor at Wimbledon since 2012. Ask Rosol, Darcis, Kyrgios. By the way in many of those years he won the FO (in dominant fashion at that) and then disappeared at Wimbledon. Those are the data which cannot be denied.
Who ever said Nadal was going to win Wimbledon? Are you confusing me with some other poster?
My only point is that Nadal has returned to very high levels of tennis and there is no evidence that is about to disappear. We will soon find out how much he can win.
Who ever said Nadal was going to win Wimbledon? Are you confusing me with some other poster?
My only point is that Nadal has returned to very high levels of tennis and there is no evidence that is about to disappear. We will soon find out how much he can win.
Don't be silly. Stan will be too tired. Nadal has won this already.I must have missed the part where NaduII already won RG.
This is clay. Nadal has this in the bag. You can start celebrating. No need to be nervous. Andy almost despatched Stan on his weakest surface, just imagine what carnage there will be on Sunday when Rafa enters his own court.Don't be 100% sure that Nadal will win Roland Garros. Not the same case, but many favored him to win the Australian Open final.
You said there is no evidence his current high is over. Completely meaningless. There is no evidence that Thiem won't win Wimbledon either. No evidence for anything. Yeah we will find out if Thiem wins Wimbledon. So what? Who cares. Meaningless blather. I've noticed that about you, you often make completely meaningless statements and then argue relentlessly on them.
Lol @ the word carnageDon't be silly. Stan will be too tired. Nadal has won this already.
This is clay. Nadal has this in the bag. You can start celebrating. No need to be nervous. Andy almost despatched Stan on his weakest surface, just imagine what carnage there will be on Sunday when Rafa enters his own court.
We've been through this before. Stop the personal insults. When you do that it gets reported and your posts deleted.You said there is no evidence his current high is over. Completely meaningless. There is no evidence that Thiem won't win Wimbledon either. No evidence for anything. Yeah we will find out if Thiem wins Wimbledon. So what? Who cares. Meaningless blather. I've noticed that about you, you often make completely meaningless statements and then argue relentlessly on them.
We've been through this before. Stop the personal insults. When you do that it gets reported and your posts deleted.
Feel free to ignore them.What personal insults? All I said was your statement is meaningless.
Feel free to ignore them.
Just make sure you've learned your lessons from prior encounters and avoid personal attacks. You should know that by now.I'll feel free to reply if I see fit. Rather, it's up to you to ignore me fella.
Just make sure you've learned your lessons from prior encounters and avoid personal attacks. You should know that by now.
This will be Nadals 15th slam, not 16th ... Now I think he will probably win Wimbledon and definetely the USO ..
True. But he came pretty close at AO. I don't think he's got much chance in Wimby but if he keeps the current level he would be a favorite for the USO.That's such a modest prediction, especially since Rafa's been so dominant on grass and HC these past few years. When was the last year he won a grass title? When was the last year he won a HC title? Please remind us....
Wawrinka's bombs off both wings will cause Nadal problems.
That's such a modest prediction, especially since Rafa's been so dominant on grass and HC these past few years. When was the last year he won a grass title? When was the last year he won a HC title? Please remind us....
This is clay. Nadal has this in the bag. You can start celebrating. No need to be nervous. Andy almost despatched Stan on his weakest surface, just imagine what carnage there will be on Sunday when Rafa enters his own court.
LOL Fed has won 2 slams in 7 years and you are ragging on Nadal not winning Wimby since 2010.Actually you're wrong. Who cares if Nadal won Wimbledon back in 2010. He hasn't won since and has been a non-factor in the last 5 years. Those are the data which cannot be denied.
Be prepared for La Decima, folks.Lol @ the word carnage
The hippocricy of Fedfans is asstounding, no ?LOL Fed has won 2 slams in 7 years and you are ragging on Nadal not winning Wimby since 2010.
Use your list to ignore any username that starts with "king".Why do you call players that you don't like derogatory names? How old are you? This is not MTF
Heartbreaking for him, but what an amazing win it would be for Diesel!Be prepared for La Decima, folks.
Much deserved by Rafa who has played at a very high level this year.
It'll be heartbreaking if he loses a second slam final, esp after his authoritative performance in the semi.
Especially with Wawrinka in the final who has yet to lose one.Don't be 100% sure that Nadal will win Roland Garros. Not the same case, but many favored him to win the Australian Open final.
LOL.This will be Nadals 15th slam, not 16th ... Now I think he will probably win Wimbledon and definetely the USO .. so that brings him up to 17 at the end of this year .... too close for comfort ...
These are just coincidences or patterns, i don't know why we behave as though they matter. It's not like he has been in 10 finals and won them all. The sample size is too small in Wawrinka's case.Especially with Wawrinka in the final who has yet to lose one.
Wonder if Stan will recover by tomorrow.Hope Stan wipes the floor with him tomorrow and all the fanboys implode
I am not Rafa's supporter. Probably will be in this match but I don't care about the final much.Don't be silly. Stan will be too tired. Nadal has won this already.
This is clay. Nadal has this in the bag. You can start celebrating. No need to be nervous. Andy almost despatched Stan on his weakest surface, just imagine what carnage there will be on Sunday when Rafa enters his own court.