JoelDali
Talk Tennis Guru
you made me smile. I love what you do sometimes .........
So many Craigslist women tell me this everyday.
It gets old.
GOATing.
you made me smile. I love what you do sometimes .........
But at the same time, I think a lot of people underestimate the difference between the men's and women's game. I agree, a 4.5 would get demolished by professional women, but that starts to change drastically quicker than most people realize. 5.0 males will hold there serve often enough to make the scores look competitive. 5.5 males would most likely be winning quite often.
.95% of the posters here are 3.0-3.5 but most believe they are much better.
5% 4.0 and higher
99% have no clue but posts lots and lots of advice.
0.5% are qualified and give advice to support their business/brand
0.5% are qualified and don't bother to give advice.
I also assume that the average Challenger circuit guy would lose 1-1 to any female in the top 100.
Anything wrong with my logic?
I think a lot of people underestimate the difference between the men's and women's game.
I was not top player in university. Win some smaller tournaments, that is all. I do not know if I could have passed ITN 2. Once in university, generally nobody bother with ITN rating. But, many players better than me.
Swedish players usually not play for university if going professional. I understand, many American pros former college players. College tennis in USA, sounds very tough.
Your logic would be sound if the assumptions made were correct; however, that assumption is extremely incorrect.
so like I said before:
OK, well, you may be right, but at least I'm providing a counterargument with reasoning and evidence. You are just contradicting me. Not really helping much. Saying "you're wrong" and leaving it at that isn't a very good way to argue... even if you are correct.
I had the pleasure of watching the top 4.0 of Randall's Island training earlier and this guy is effing rising and could hang with any top tier, computer rated D1. Even at age 41.
95% of the posters here are 3.0-3.5 but most believe they are much better.
5% 4.0 and higher
99% have no clue but posts lots and lots of advice.
0.5% are qualified and give advice to support their business/brand
0.5% are qualified and don't bother to give advice.
Guys that win 400 point open-level USTA tournaments usually don't have an NTRP rating, because they are beyond NTRP ratings. I always assumed these guys were better than 5.5s.
I also assume that guys that win open level 400 point tournaments aren't good enough for the Challenger circuit, and would likely lose 1-1 in the first round.
I also assume that the average Challenger circuit guy would lose 1-1 to any female in the top 100.
Therefore, it stands to reason that a 5.5 wouldn't even get a point from a female top 100 player.
Anything wrong with my logic?
On ttw, even LeeD defeats most of them.Like LeeD said, unless the WTA player is named Serena, they would be in serious trouble against a top level D1 player. A Challengers player would easily defeat most if not all of them.
You need a new transmission and a Johnson rod.
I had the pleasure of watching the top 4.0 of Randall's Island training earlier and this guy is effing rising and could hang with any top tier, computer rated D1. Even at age 41.
How would a 4.0 hang with a top rated D1 player?
That doesn't even make sense, the gap is huge.
Ahh, I see.
This forum, very high quality tennis players then. Everybody seems to be 4.5 or better.
How would a 4.0 hang with a top rated D1 player?
That doesn't even make sense, the gap is huge.
Post a video, we'll tell you about it, exactly.What, exactly.......is 4.5?
What, exactly.......is 4.5?
What, exactly.......is 4.5?
The 4.0 was 41 so he had the age advantage. And the shoes and stencils.How would a 4.0 hang with a top rated D1 player?
That doesn't even make sense, the gap is huge.
95% of the posters here are 3.0-3.5 but most believe they are much better.
5% 4.0 and higher
99% have no clue but posts lots and lots of advice.
0.5% are qualified and give advice to support their business/brand
0.5% are qualified and don't bother to give advice.
The 4.0 was 41 so he had the age advantage. And the shoes and stencils.
Shoes and stencils make a huge difference. Age advantage and the fact that he was most likely a rising 4.0 are just added bonuses.
There was a similar thread in which people were discussing their fastest serves. Someone said "everyone claims they serve over 100mph" when if you counted the hundred or so posts in the thread, only three different poasters had claimed to serve over 100mph.
Do you mean 120mph? Because being able to serve 100 mph extremely common.
Am I the only one who thinks Edburger is just an American troll who pretends to be Swedish? .
This, not very polite. Always those who not speak second language, mock other people's English.No, you're not. I called him out on his B.S. on another thread. I don't know if he's necessarily American but he is definitely an English speaker. His attempts at fake ESL are comical. My money is on him being MMI.
This, not very polite. Always those who not speak second language, mock other people's English.
I speak four languages. You?
In my section the 4.0 players are on a different level altogether. Most of them wear the latest shoes from Tennis Warehouse and stencil their strings. These guys can definitely hang with a falling D1.
No, you're not. I called him out on his B.S. on another thread. I don't know if he's necessarily American but he is definitely an English speaker. His attempts at fake ESL are comical. My money is on him being MMI.
No, serving 100mph is not extremely common at the rec level, especially at the 3.0-4.0 level that is realistic for the majority of rec players. That's why a few poasters were upset that rec players could do it. (I agree that it isn't uncommon among healthy athletic guys, but most tennis players aren't healthy athletic guys.)
From now on, I'd like to see those claiming "everyone" is claiming 4.5-5.0 to start naming names.
My money is on DefensiveTennis. MMI appears to be back with an account sanctioned by the tt powers-that-be after reaching an agreement to behave himself.
Can a 4.5 enter The Wimbledon if they paid the tourney fee? Is it even listed on TennisLink anywhere?