mike danny
Bionic Poster
I am impressed by Halep's ability to win her matches easier now. She has only dropped one set so far and in that one match she dropped a set in, she was the better player anyway.
Not my favourite by any means but cheering for Simona on Saturday! Sloane is an annoying pusher from what I've seen and Halep has been more aggressive this tournament than previous years so hope she gets the win.
Halep has been a pusher most of the times I've seen her, but today and against Kerber she has been the aggressor and she has been good enough to pull it off so fair play to her. Gotta be honest Sloane isn't exactly high on my list of players to watch so I might be misjudging her.Pusher really? Halep pushes the ball even more with those rallies waiting for the UE. Hope Sloane wins on Sunday. I hate halep’s style.
Halep has been a pusher most of the times I've seen her, but today and against Kerber she has been the aggressor and she has been good enough to pull it off so fair play to her. Gotta be honest Sloane isn't exactly high on my list of players to watch so I might be misjudging her.
Should we also regard those who enhance performance with creatine and coffee/caffeine as doping cheats? More evidence that these substances enhance performance than Meldo.
Agreed. Halep had 16 winners today in a relatively short match (Mugua had 14), and 26 against Kerber (24 for the latter). These are good numbers for a player who is not known to be aggressive, and I think that it reflects some of Halep' strengths: she can force her opponents to make unforced errors (53 by Kerber and 31 by Mugu), but she can also wait patiently before pulling the trigger. Her ability to defend and to retrieve balls allows her to choose when to go for the winner. When I watch her, I don't see a player who is afraid of being aggressive, on the one hand, or afraid of being patient and construct the point nicely, on the other.Halep has been a pusher most of the times I've seen her, but today and against Kerber she has been the aggressor and she has been good enough to pull it off so fair play to her.
Yes.Anyone trust Halep to actually win this?
Muguruza is almost unstoppable when she is playing well. However, she's not a great problem solver in my view, and still prone to big lapses in her level. She started slow today and never found a good formula to unlock Halep's defences. She managed to get a break early in the 2nd set, but still lost it 4-6. She is too inconsistent for the talent that she has (which is something that she can improve over time).What happened here ????? Wasn't Mugu supposed to be too powerful for Simona ????????
Should we also regard those who enhance performance with creatine and coffee/caffeine as doping cheats? More evidence that these substances enhance performance than Meldo.
Heh, so you're one of "those" apologist.
and of course carb loading with pasta.
The Russian files were very factual, as was the missed test. 5-1 and 4-1 to the Williams, no room for argument really.
I don't mind as long as she's champ by Saturday again
so what does this mean for the final ? how does simona matchup with powerful but tempermental sloan ?If Halep wins, she will be the 4th lady to win her first slam in the last 5 slams: Ostapenko, Stephens and Wozniacki achieved that over the past 12 months.
Muguruza is almost unstoppable when she is playing well. However, she's not a great problem solver in my view, and still prone to big lapses in her level. She started slow today and never found a good formula to unlock Halep's defences. She managed to get a break early in the 2nd set, but still lost it 4-6. She is too inconsistent for the talent that she has (which is something that she can improve over time).
To me, Muguruza relies a lot on her A game. Simona, however, is a bigger fighter, never gives up and that in itself can always keep her in matches, even those that she ends up losing. When she has a slow start, like against Kerber, she knows how to walk her way back into matches.
Bore off, you know exactly who I was talking about and it wasn't Graf. Whether you reply with an essay or not, she still holds 23 slams. Go cry somewhere else.
And Mrs. Margaret Court has 24.
But if you want to denigrate her AO titles, then you have to acknowledge that Evert was basically only playing 3 majors a year, and only 2 in some years bc of WTT.
And if you want to take other factors into play, Steffi has better other factors.
Quite a pickle you're in.
And Mrs. Margaret Court has 24.
But if you want to denigrate her AO titles, then you have to acknowledge that Evert was basically only playing 3 majors a year, and only 2 in some years bc of WTT.
And if you want to take other factors into play, Steffi has better other factors.
Quite a pickle you're in.
Margaret Court at 24 Slams has never held more weight than Navratilova at 18 or Graf at 22. The reason is because she won a bunch of Australian titles when none of the top players bothered to show up. People always held Graf's 22 with way more weight than Court's 24. Now that number has been surpassed and some of you are having trouble dealing with it.
so what does this mean for the final ? how does simona matchup with powerful but tempermental sloan ?
Exactly. It's really embarrassing.
No one ever talked about Court being the GOAT until Serena got close to surpassing Steffi.
Margaret Court at 24 Slams has never held more weight than Navratilova at 18 or Graf at 22. The reason is because she won a bunch of Australian titles when none of the top players bothered to show up. People always held Graf's 22 with way more weight than Court's 24. Now that number has been surpassed and some of you are having trouble dealing with it.
And Mrs. Margaret Court has 24.
But if you want to denigrate her AO titles, then you have to acknowledge that Evert was basically only playing 3 majors a year, and only 2 in some years bc of WTT.
And if you want to take other factors into play, Steffi has better other factors.
Quite a pickle you're in.
I have no idea what "Russian files" you're talking about, and, whatever they are, who SAYS, they were "very factual," YOU? Don't know what your 2nd sentence means, either. You can whine about something that happened 7 years ago all you want, no suspension, no fine, not even a reprimand, as opposed to the cheating shrieker, who got booted from the game for a year and a half. Fifty years from now, any story about her will mention that she was suspended for cheating...no room for argument, really.
He's talking about the Fancy Bears leak of the documents from the Olympics. One of the documents released showed that Serena had gotten a TUE for a banned substance during one of her French Open runs. Personally, I don't like the lack of transparency regarding TUE's, because they've been abused in other sports in the past.
Because everyone knows Court wasn't the GOAT. She's just used as a hurdle to denigrate what Serena achieved. Serena's 23 > Court's 24.
Imagine if peak Court played peak Serena
The result would be a H2H bearing a resemblance to this:
Where did I suggest anything? Kinda making an ass of yourself.Another brilliant suggestion. The public should have access to athletes' medical records because you don't like the lack of "transparency."
Where did I suggest anything? Kinda making an ass of yourself.
Only reason I wouldn't want Halep to win is Darrin Cahill is an arrogant little ****
Exactly. I grew up regarding Steffi the GOAT for her 22 slams and I remember everyone else having the same opinion. Margaret was never talked about.Margaret Court at 24 Slams has never held more weight than Navratilova at 18 or Graf at 22. The reason is because she won a bunch of Australian titles when none of the top players bothered to show up. People always held Graf's 22 with way more weight than Court's 24. Now that number has been surpassed and some of you are having trouble dealing with it.
Yes.
She didn't choke in AO. She was in hospital for some time after the match. This time its different.I sure don't want Sloane to have another slam but Halep could very well choke.
She didn't choke in AO. She was in hospital for some time after the match. This time its different.I sure don't want Sloane to have another slam but Halep could very well choke.
She didn't choke in AO. She was in hospital for some time after the match. This time its different.
And since when did Sloane become so good on clay?
We all know Halep is favorite, just most are thinking she will choke in another final.
Only reason I wouldn't want Halep to win is Darrin Cahill is an arrogant little ****
Good point. We all love to pay out Halep (myself included) but she really only choked against Ostapenko.. I mean she was up a break in the 3rd against Wozniacki but she was also down a break twice against Woz in the 3rd so she fought well. And her final against Sharapova was very competitive.She didn't choke in AO. She was in hospital for some time after the match. This time its different.