Djokovic and Alcaraz draw - Wimbledon 2023

RF-18

Talk Tennis Guru
Djokovic

1R: Cachín
2R: Nakashima
3R: Etcheverry/Wawrinka
4R: Hurkacz/Musetti
QF: Rublev/Bublik/Kyrgios
SF: Sinner
F: Alcaraz

Alcaraz

R1 Chardy
R2 - Rinderknech
R3 - Jarry/Humbert
R4 - De Minaur/Zverev
QF - Rune
SF - Medvedev
F - Djokovic
 
Last edited:

Kralingen

Talk Tennis Guru
Both very manageable draws for the top seeds.

People lose their heads way too easily about draws. Was anyone really calling Jarry or Zverev a dangerous floater pre tournament? And Rune hasn’t proven a single thing on grass yet, I would bet Tiafoe makes it in the QF. It is an alright but very doable draw for Carlos.

It’s like people expect that top seeds wouldn’t have to play anyone at all.

As for Novak: Hurkacz is good on paper at least but the guy is addicted to playing 5 setters and isn’t in the best form. Still in the 4R that’s the toughest one could get. Rublev/Bublik will be interesting at least and then Sinner/Fritz are decent but again, if Novak is who we think he is he won’t be losing to any of that lot.

I saw Novak and Carlos in the final pre tournament and I am unwavering in that belief.
 
Horrific draw as expected. Almost makes me sick, really.

They apparently aren't tired of this same 36 year old man winning their tournament for the 5th time in a row

when the most exciting player to appear in the last 10 years has arrived on the scene.

Whatta farce
 

Kralingen

Talk Tennis Guru
C'mon Rublev and Musetti won't do anything. Neither will old ass Wawrinka. Sinner has been garbage and injury prone this year. He won't make it that far either
I agree for the most part, it’s Hurkacz and Bublik who stick out.

That said: what scares you about Jarry, Zverev/De Minaur, and Rune/Tiafoe? I’m confused. That draw doesn’t seem tough to me.
 

UnforcedTerror

Hall of Fame
Ruusuvuori, Hurkacz, Bublik, Sinner and Alcaraz all back to back!!!

Utterly disgusting draw

This can't be random, they want Djokovic to lose no matter what.
 
I agree for the most part, it’s Hurkacz and Bublik who stick out.

That said: what scares you about Jarry, Zverev/De Minaur, and Rune/Tiafoe? I’m confused. That draw doesn’t seem tough to me.

Zverev is improving all the time and Tiafoe is one of the best grass-court players. Rinderknech is also potentially a round 2 opponent and he was very good in Queens
 

RF-18

Talk Tennis Guru
I'll happily swap Alcaraz's draw with Djokovic's any time of the day, twice on sundays

Sure, I agree Djoko is the one more satisfied but we aren't talking about some major difference. The only thing I see a big difference is the 4th rounds. Zverev might be dangerous here for Alcaraz.

Alcaraz first 3 rounds btw are weaker than Djokos.
 
S

Slicehand

Guest
Wimbledon 2022 has nothing to do with Djokovic respecting the rules, those points had they remained would be mean he is world number one, even if he missed all those NA events.
oh yeah that, well he didnt have to face Rublev, the hardest oponent, so i hope you understand he doesnt deserve the points
 

junior74

Talk Tennis Guru
Djoko got Sinner in his section. Wawrinka, Rublev/Bublik, Musetti. It has potential to be off the chain!

Yes, Chains is in the other half
5cp4bsde08x21.jpg
 

UnforcedTerror

Hall of Fame
Djoko got Sinner in his section. Wawrinka, Rublev/Bublik, Musetti. It has potential to be off the chain!
How come you included Musetti and Etcheverry in Nole's draw but not Ruusuvuori and Kyrgios? Sure they're not seeded but it's grass they're way bigger threats on this surface.
 

RF-18

Talk Tennis Guru
How come you included Musetti and Etcheverry in Nole's draw but not Ruusuvuori and Kyrgios? Sure they're not seeded but it's grass they're way bigger threats on this surface.

I saw this path on twitter so I just copy pasted it. Didn't know about Kyrg. Is it 4th round or QFs they can play?
 
This is the weakest era in history, grass is the weakest surface, and Djokovic also keeps getting the weakest draws. He is winning at least 10-12 Wimbledon titles given that.

Excellent post, but you left out two important facts:

1). It is not only the weakest era in history, but the weakest era possible. (Not only has there never been a weaker era, but there could not be a weaker era). It is, in fact, the weakest era of all possible worlds.
2). Thus, even if Djokovic were to go beyond your modest prediction and win 15 Wimbledon titles in this weakest era of all possible worlds, it would not matter one jot! None of the titles would be meaningful in the slightest. They're playing for neither the trophy nor the prize money (nor even the love of the game and of the competition), they're playing to be an ATG, which is the only thing that makes a tennis career worthwhile. Winning titles in the weakest era of all possible worlds does not advance one's ATG credentials one iota, and therefore any future Wimbledon titles would be as meaningless for Djokovic as have been all of his titles starting at least in 2018 (and arguably even 2014 and 2015 matter little). But certainly the last four titles don't mean a thing!
 

Kralingen

Talk Tennis Guru
It’s a one match tournament just like RG. Djokovic-Carlos is the only one that will matter

This tour is increasingly and frighteningly becoming a two player tour with Djokovic and Alcaraz.
 

Hitman

Bionic Poster
Excellent post, but you left out two important facts:

1). It is not only the weakest era in history, but the weakest era possible. (Not only has there never been a weaker era, but there could not be a weaker era). It is, in fact, the weakest era of all possible worlds.
2). Thus, even if Djokovic were to go beyond your modest prediction and win 15 Wimbledon titles in this weakest era of all possible worlds, it would not matter one jot! None of the titles would be meaningful in the slightest. They're playing for neither the trophy nor the prize money (nor even the love of the game and of the competition), they're playing to be an ATG, which is the only thing that makes a tennis career worthwhile. Winning titles in the weakest era of all possible worlds does not advance one's ATG credentials one iota, and therefore any future Wimbledon titles would be as meaningless for Djokovic as have been all of his titles starting at least in 2018 (and arguably even 2014 and 2015 matter little). But certainly the last four titles don't mean a thing!

Better let Wimbledon know, those guys think their title is worth something.
 
Top