stringertom
Bionic Poster
I’ve sweated a lot today at work and needed some sodium chloride replenishment. I knew just where to go and I am not disappoint.
Got to protect the overrated Swissy's Slam record don't we W organizers? How much money does Fed pay these clowns under the table every year to rig it for him is what I would like to do. He gets a cakewalk most years
I WOULD boycott this event if I was Nadal. The blatant favoritism and backwards seeding it obvious to anyone that sees it. The organizers are bribed
Cause he is 3rd wheel.So sick of all the crying that Fed and Rafa fans do about easy draws. Every event they enter, it's the same crap. Especially when a major rolls around. Both guys have ate plenty of cake in their careers. Seems like Djokovic fans whine much less(on average) about draws. Humble Nole Class will win Wimbledon.
But I thought Cilic was a nobody when Fed played him? Sorry, but if NK, shapo, cilic, Tsonga, and Thiem on grass is a ridiculous draw, then tennis is certainly in bad shape.
Well thank you, someone had to do it!I seem to remember all the Federer fans targeting Nadal for his FO 2019 draw, time to bring some balance to this forum because it's hilarious there's no threads made about Federer's draw. But it's okay, I'll be that guy to bring the balance.
Let's look at the comparison between Nadal's and Federer's draws. Bolded players are stronger players per round.
Nadal:
1R . Sugita
2R. Kyrgios
3R. Tsonga
4R. Cilic / Shapovalov
QF. Thiem
SF. Federer
F. Djokovic
Federer:
1R. Harris
2R. Clarke
3R. Bublik
4R. Coric
QF. Isner / Nishikori
SF. Nadal
F. Djokovic
Up until the SF and that's even if Nadal gets through his draw, absolute walk in the park.
I can't wait to hear how Clarke, Bublik, Coric, Isner are stronger than Kyrgios, Tsonga, Cilic, Thiem. And yes, Cilic as a 4th opponent is much tougher than as a finalist before you guys use the Wimbledon 2017 card.
So Fed has an easy draw. Rafa has a hard draw. Djokers is the easiest.Well thank you, someone had to do it!
LMAONadal should just cancel Wimbledon and marry his long-suffering wench.
Just have him neutered.My cat just bit me I think he’s mad about Feds easy draw
But any verified statistical measurement is objective and exists. That's basically a tautology. That inherent property doesn't matter much per se when it comes to explanatory power; the fact that Tim Henman reached the SFs of Wimbledon 4 times is objective and exists. Is it therefore relevant? Probably not. So what does make it relevant? What property of the stats actually means anything and indicates or validates a position? Therein lies the problem that the stats need context to achieve anything and reiterating ad nauseum that they are 'cold', 'hard' and 'objective' expands on their explanatory power not one iota.
Have you heard of the ATP rankings, kiddo?
In Wimbledon 2017, Fed faced 3 consistent Wimbledon quarterfinalists/semifinalists, and another former semifinalist, including the 2016 runner-up: Raonic at that time is tougher than Kyrgios/Shapovalov/washed-up Tsonga/claycourter Thiem combined, amd on par with 2019 Cilic.And yes, Cilic as a 4th opponent is much tougher than as a finalist before you guys use the Wimbledon 2017 card.
I mean, I'm not posting this to prop up Rafa's Wimbledon chances, just to point out that Roger trails Rafa in slams when adjusted by difficulty.
Coric is injured might pull out, Isner has fractured foot, didn't played since Miami, and let's see if Nadal can reach the SF first, with the draw he has. Fedr draw is a joke.Only because Federer could not play himself
Anyway, to the draw...Coric-Isner-Nadal is no cakewalk.
Of course he's out. He was seriously injured before the draw was made. No wonder he was in Fedr section of the draw.Coric is out
No Ill take the cakewalk thank you very much, about time Fed got one of Nadal's draws.@tennis_pro
yo can you also get mad by my post plz? i think you're the only one left out of the party
k, thx
No Ill take the cakewalk thank you very much, about time Fed got one of Nadal's draws.
2004-2008Just one USO rant plz?
He saw that he was in Fed's section of the draw so he withdrew.Of course he's out. He was seriously injured before the draw was made. No wonder he was in Fedr section of the draw.
Rafans won't be to critical of that, I'm sure.He saw that he was in Fed's section of the draw so he withdrew.